Since it was developed in the 1920s, communication
researchers observed how propaganda messages
were utilized to serve the ends of war in the recently concluded World War I and in the following years leading up to World War II. Its origin are unknown but Harold Lasswell introduced Hypodermic Needle Theory in 1972 in his book entitled Propaganda Techniques in the World War I. The emergence of this theory was also when a very pioneering invention of the era was invented surrounding the two world wars which is the television. Between the late part of 1920s, a private institution named The Payne Fund conducted a research to asses the effect of media on children. The research concluded the films has strong influence on children and the results caused panic among public which also enabled the formulation of a governing code for the movie industry. By the 1950s the weakness of the hypodermic needle theory began to emerge. These opinion leaders actively access information from the media and transmit it to less active sectors of the population. In two-step flow, the importance of the media was diminished in favor of the mediating role of the opinion leaders. Thus, the theory has been called a two-step flow with the media as the first step and the opinion leaders as the second step. There have also been criticisms levied against the uses and gratifications approach. First, it clearly assumes that we have complete choices as to what we receive or consume from the media. We are unconscious as our everyday life is saturated by media messages Another criticism is that the individual becomes the unit of analysis and thus the social dimension of viewership is totally absent from the theory. The uses and gratification that an individual might claim for evey media and information message that comes an individual’s way is influenced by the social group which joins in the viewing process. Introduced by George Gebner which he argued that television cultivates in its viewers a way of sensing and seeing the world. Gebner intuited that regular usage of television over extended periods of time can shape people’s opinions, views and behavior. Postman (1985,144) stated that television viewing does not significantly increase lelarning and is inferior to and less likely than print to cultivate higher-order inferential thinking. For Morgan (1989,2) the increased time given to adverstisers have made television viewers subordinate to corporate interests. On the decoding side, which is on the part of the audience, the media and information texts are always open to a range of meaning in terms of interpretation. The notion of polysemic text. Poly implies multiplicity, while semic is derived from the greek word sema, meanind audiences see various meaning in the signs that are in media and information texts. Usually, the social factors are summed up as the triumvirate of class, gender, and ethnicity.