2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers

INTEGRATION OF SAFETY
PROCESS INDEX IN CHEMICAL
INDUSTRY

Dyan Hatining Ayu Sudarni, Juwari, Renanto Handogo

Department of Chemical Engineering

Faculty of Technology Industry,
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember,
Surabaya - Indonesia
 INTRODUCTION

Flixborough Disaster
1974

industrial
disasters
Bhopal Disaster
1984 How about safety
prevention in
plant industry

Chernobyl Disaster
1986

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 2

 INTRODUCTION

Accident
Inherent Safety
Plant Design
industrial

Safety Method Assessment

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 3

 INTRODUCTION
PIIS
(Edward dan Lawrance,
1993)

ISI
(Heikkila, 1999)

NuDITS
(Ahmad, 2014)

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 4

 METHOD

ISV (Index Safety Value)

ISV is a safety assessment from the initial plant design concept.

ISV = IVC + IVP (1)

Index Safety Value = Index total from main parameters

Inherent Value Chemical (IVC) = chemicals safety parameters
Inherent Value Process (IVP) = process safety from operating conditions plant

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 5

 The Calculation of ISV Method
METHOD
1. Determine of Parameter

 Inherent Value Chemical (IVC)  Inherent Value Process (IVP)

a. Flammability (VFL) a. Temperature (VT)
b. Explosiveness (VEXP) b. Pressure (VP)
c. Toxicity (VTOX) c. Heat of Reaction (VHR)
d. Reactivity (VREAC) d. Inventory (VI)

2. Calculation Method Index Safety Value

ISV = IVC + IVP (1)

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 6

 The Calculation of Method ISV
METHOD

3. Analysis of Safety Levels with Characteristic

Table Characteristic of The Risk Level

Risk Level Index

Severe 0,751 - 1
Heavy 0,501 - 0,75
Moderate 0,251 - 0,5
Light 0 - 0,25

 Index 0 is the level of light.

 Index 1 is greater risk level.

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 7

 RESULT

The research takes case of making Methyl Methacrylate (MMA)

with Acetone Cyanohydrin (ACH).

Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN)

Acetone Cyanohydrin (ACH)
HMPSA/HMPSE
Methyl Methacrylate (MMA)

8
The Comparison ISV Method and Previous Method
RESULT
Method
Route
PIIS ISI NuDITS ISV

HCN Product 0,422 0,291 0,260 0.2987

ACH Product 0,250 0,244 0,235 0.2727

HMPA/HMPSE 0,141 0,244 0,256 0.2273

MMA Product 0,188 0,221 0,248 0.2013

9
 RESULT
Table Characteristic of The Risk Level

ISV ISV (%) Karakteristik

23 0.2987 Moderate

21 0.2727 Moderate

17,5 0.2273 Light

15,5 0.2013 Light

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 10

 RESULT

Result Integration of Parameters (Method ISV)

ISV ISV (%) Karakteristik

Route HCN
0.5152 Heavy
Route ACH
0.1829 Light
Route
0.1736 Light
HMPA/HMPSE
Route MMA
0.1283 Light

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 11

 CONCLUSION

The proses manufacturing of MMA has higher risk level in the direction of HCN product
with an index value of 0,5152 and heavy characteristics. The low less risk level is step of
production of MMA with index value 0,1883and light characteristics.
A method of ISV this can only be used for just one production process. This method will
be used to assessment with be integrated for two main parameters and this method is easy to
use.

2016 International Symposium for Young Chemical Engineers 12

THANKS YOU

2 0 1 6 I N T E R N AT I O N A L S Y M P O S I U M F O R
YOUNG CHEMICAL ENGINEERS