Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(UDD)
DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT?
Case study in three public hospitals
Advantages (ASHP,1986):
A reduction in the incidence of medication errors.
A decrease in the total cost of medication related activities.
A more efficient usage of pharmacy and nursing personal, allowing for
more direct patient care involvement by pharmacist and nurses.
Improved overall drug control and drug use monitoring.
More accurate patient billings for drugs.
The elimination or minimization of drug credits.
Greater control by the pharmacist over pharmacy work load pattern
and staff scheduling.
A reduction in the size of drug inventories located in patient care
areas.
Greater adaptability to computerized and automated procedures.
INDONESIA EXPERIENCE
OPPORTUNITIES OBSTACLES
Hospital C
Type C Hospital, located in Brebes, Central Java
Province
District Hospital with 213 patient beds.
Bed Occupation Rate (BOR) ± 62,41%.
Has 5 specialist Departments
Has implemented UDD in one Ward since 1995.
FINDINGS: HOSPITAL A
Facilities
Equipments to support UDD are not enough. To serve 74 beds, 5
trolleys are available
Inadequate room for UDD preparation
In parallel with UDD, patients also receive medications from other
sources
Staffing
3 pharmacists, 4 pharmacy technicians and 1 non-medical staff
In continuous education about UDD concepts among health providers
Poor communication between provider-patient and providers-providers
Managerial supports
No enforcement for UDD implementation
No explicit budget allocation for UDD implementation
Imbalance incentive-disincentive system, resulting in serious conflict of
financial interest
FINDING: HOSPITAL B
Facilities
Inadequate equipments to support UDD. To serve 90 beds, 12 small
trolleys are available
Inadequate room for UDD preparation
In parallel with UDD, patients also receive medications from other
sources
Staffing
3 pharmacists, 13 pharmacy technicians
Routine education about UDD concepts among health providers (twice a
year)
Poor communication between providers-providers, due to frequent
absence of the doctors
Managerial supports
Enforcement for UDD implementation in a form of written Director
Instruction
Inadequate budget allocation for UDD implementation
Conflict of financial interest still exists
FINDINGS: HOSPITAL C
Facilities
Lack of equipments to support UDD. No medicine trolley, inadequate
drug packaging
No room for UDD preparation
A private drug outlet exists in the Ward
Staffing
1 pharmacists, 1 pharmacy technicians
Education about UDD concepts was addressed to few health
providers
Poor communication between providers-patients
Managerial supports
Enforcement for UDD implementation in a form of written Director
Instruction
No budget allocation for UDD implementation
Imbalance incentive-disincentive system, resulting in serious conflict
of financial interest
Conclusions
Facilities
These three hospitals do not provide adequate equipments and
rooms for UDD implementation. Lack of this support indicates
that UDD implementation is not a priority.
Staffing
Most hospitals have inadequate number of pharmacists and
pharmacy technicians to support UDD implementation, and the
concepts of UDD does not disseminated thoroughly to all
providers. Again, lack of this support indicates that UDD
implementation is not a priority.
Managerial support
In most hospitals, there is practically no political supports from
the hospital managers. Unwillingness to implement UDD is
mostly due to serious conflict of financial interest.
Recommendations
Efforts should be sought to improve the
understanding of hospital managers on the
importance of good dispensing practices
without sacrificing the hospital income.
Better balance between incentive and
disincentive should be promoted by hospital
managers to eliminate the conflict of
financial interest.
Improving rational use of medicine should
be supported by improving the work
environment
Thank You