You are on page 1of 25

Pediatric Brain Tumors in Non Hispanics,

Africans Americans and Asians: differences in


survival after diagnosis

Authors: Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, Richard K. Severson,


Bonita Stanton, Merlin Hamre & Andrew E. Sloan
Source: Cancer Causes & Control, Vol. 16, No. 5 (June,
2005), pp.587-592
Published By: Springer
Presented To:
Dr Zahid Ahmed
Presented By:
Rabia Manzoor (557-stat-11)
Salma Zafar (562-stat-11)
Outline

 Introduction
 Background
 Methods
 Study Population
 Objectives
 Statistical Analysis
 Results & Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
Introduction

A brain tumor is an abnormal growth of tissue in the brain.


It is spread by local extension and rarely metastasize
outside the brain.

Brain tumor are the most common solid and the second
most frequent malignancy in childhood.
Symptoms

 Headaches(usually worse in the morning)


 Nausea and vomiting
 Changes in speech, vision or hearing
 Changes in mood, personality or ability to concentrate
 Problems balancing or walking
 Problems with memory
 Muscle jerking
 Tingling in the arm or legs
Types of Brain Tumor

There are the types of primary brain tumor.


 Astrocytoma
i. Low grade
ii. High grade
iii. other
 Ependymoma
 Medulloblastoma
Background

This Study is dealing with the Pediatric Brain Tumor of


different minorities of US (United States) which is
compared with Non-Hispanics.
Where

Non-Hispanics → White
Hispanics → Spanish, Caucasian etc
African American → Africans who live in US
Asian → Chinese, Japanese, Korean, other Asians.
Study Design

 Subjects were 2788 children, age ≤19 year old at


diagnosed between 1973 and 1996 with primary brain
tumor.

 Data was collected through SEER Program.

 All result were performed using SAS version 9.1 and S-


Plus version 6.1 professional statistical software.
Objectives

 To assess racial differences in survival of children with


brain tumor.

 To estimate overall survival by race.

 To assess differences between survival curves


Variables

 Age at Diagnosis (Years)


 Gender
 Surgery Status
 Radiation Status
 Treatment Pattern
 Primary Site in Brain
 Histological Type of Tumor
Statistical Analysis

 Chi-square test (Racial differences in prognostic


variable of interest)

 Kaplan-Meier method

 The log rank test

 Cox proportional hazard model


Results
Kaplan Meier Survival Curve
Discussion

 Comparison with other Researches


(African American have high proportion of having
medulloblastoma. [13], this study shows that Hispanics and
Asians … )
(Non Hispanics had highest proportion of Astrocytoma,
other which have been shown in previous study using data
from CBTRUS [15])
 Advantages of the Study
1. High quality data
2. results are more likely to apply to the greater US population
3. large SS allowed us to examine all three racial groups which is
generally not possible in smaller, hospital based studies.

 Limitations of the study


1. Hispanic ethnicity classification
2. Surgery as a dichotomous variable
3. Types of treatments
Conclusion

Overall survival after diagnosis of pediatric brain tumor is


similar for Hispanics, African Americans, Asians and
Non-Hispanics. The Distribution of histological type of
tumor varied significantly by race, but survival do not
significantly vary by race.
Acknowledgment

Support for JSB-S by NCI grant number K07 CA91849 and


a grant from the American Brain Tumor Association.
References
1. Ries LAG, et al. (1999) Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and
Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975 1995, NIH Pub. No. 99-4649.
Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, SEER Program.
2. Bleyer A, et al. In the United States, p?diatrie brain tumors and other CNS tumors
are now more common than childhood ALL and have a 3-fold greater national
mortality rate than ALL. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical
Oncology (ASCO).
3. Pollack IF (1999) P?diatrie brain tumors. Semin Surg Oncol 16(2): 73-90.
4. Sklar CA (2002) Childhood brain tumors. J Pediatr Endocrinol, Metab15(Suppl
2): 669-673.
5. Davis FG, et al. (1998) Survival rates in patients with primary malignant brain
tumors stratified by patient age and tumor histological type: an analysis based on
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, 1973-1991. J
Neurosurg 88(1): 1-10.
6. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Schwartz AG (2003) Relative survival rates and
patterns of diagnosis analyzed by time period for individuals with primary
malignant brain tumor, 1973-1997. J Neurosurg 99(3): 458-466.
7. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Schwartz AG (2003) Racial differences in survival
after diagnosis with primary malignant brain tumor. Cancer 98(3): 603-609.
8. Chen P, et al. (2001) Ethnicity delineates different genetic path ways in malignant
glioma. Cancer Res 61(10): 3949-3954.
9. SEER (2003) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program -
seer.cancer.gov.
10. Jemal A, et al. (2004) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-
2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer 101(1): 3-27.
11. CBTRUS (2004) Statistical Report: Primary Brain Tumors in the United States,
1997-2001. Chicago: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States.
12. Grovas A, et al. (1997) The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of
childhood cancers in the United States. Cancer 80(12): 2321-2332.
13. Mahaley MS, Jr, et al. (1990) Analysis of patterns of care of brain tumor patients
in the United States: a study of the Brain Tumor Section of the AANS and the
CNS and the Commission on Cancer of the ACS. Clin Neurosurg 36: 347-352.
14. Ries LAG, et al. (2003) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975 2000, http: j j
seer.cancer.gov j csr j. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
15. Surawicz TS, et al. (1999) Descriptive epidemiology of primary brain and CNS tumors: results from the
Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 1990-1994. Neuro-oncol 1(1): 14-25.
16. Duffner PK, et al. (1986) Survival of children with brain tumors: SEER Program, 1973-1980. Neurology
36(5): 597-601.
17. USCB (2003) U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division: Annual Estimates of the Population by Race Alone
or in Combination and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States and States.: Washington DC.
18. USCB (1998) United States Census Bureau (USCB). Current population reports, Series P23-194. Population
profile of the United States: 1997. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
19. Fritz A, et al. (2000) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edn. Geneva: World Health
Organization.
20. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:
457-481.
21. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 30: 248-275.
22. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (1998) Survival Analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
23. SAS (2003) Statistical Analysis Software, Version 9.1, Cary, North Carolina.
24. S-Plus (2003) Version 6.1 Professional, Insightful, Corp., Seattle, WA.
25. Rosenfeld JV, Ashley DM (2001) Management of brain tumors in the p?diatrie patient. In Brain Tumors, 2nd
edn. An Encyclopedic Approach. Kaye AH, Laws ER, Eds. London: Churchill Living stone.
26. Mahaley MS, Jr, et al. (1989) National survey of patterns of care for brain-tumor patients. J Neurosurg 71(6):
826-836.
27. Bleyer WA, et al. (1997) National cancer clinical trials: children have
equal access; adolescents do not. J Adolesc Health 21(6): 366 373.
28. Bleyer WA, et al. (1997) Equal participation of minority patients in U.S.
national p?diatrie cancer clinical trials. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 19(5):
423-427.
29. Swallen KC, et al. (1997) Predictors of misclassification of Hispanic
ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry. Ann Epidemiol 7(3): 200-
206.
30. USCensus (1980) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
1980 Census of Population and Housing: Spanish Surname List Technical
Documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Data User
Services Division.
31. Messite J, Stellman SD (1996) Accuracy of death certificate completion:
the need for formalized physician training. Jama 275(10): 794-796.
Thank You

You might also like