Incremental change refers to small, gradual adjustments that do not significantly alter existing structures or methods. Transformational change involves radically altering core elements like culture, strategy, and structure. While transformational change carries more risk, incremental change is often more appropriate when caution is needed in modifying an organization. Examples show how companies like Gillette and Coca-Cola have used incremental innovations like new product features or lines to adapt to changing needs without disruptive transformations.
Incremental change refers to small, gradual adjustments that do not significantly alter existing structures or methods. Transformational change involves radically altering core elements like culture, strategy, and structure. While transformational change carries more risk, incremental change is often more appropriate when caution is needed in modifying an organization. Examples show how companies like Gillette and Coca-Cola have used incremental innovations like new product features or lines to adapt to changing needs without disruptive transformations.
Incremental change refers to small, gradual adjustments that do not significantly alter existing structures or methods. Transformational change involves radically altering core elements like culture, strategy, and structure. While transformational change carries more risk, incremental change is often more appropriate when caution is needed in modifying an organization. Examples show how companies like Gillette and Coca-Cola have used incremental innovations like new product features or lines to adapt to changing needs without disruptive transformations.
the business world, the fact of making an incremental change does not have a significant impact on the existing structures or alter current methods. Appropriate examples of incremental change might include continuous improvement as a quality management process or implementation of new computer system to increase efficiencies. “Contrary to incremental change, transformational change is the process of altering the basic elements of an organization as culture, including the norms, values, and assumptions under which the organization functions. When it comes to the business environment, transformational change deals with a company making a radical change in its business model, often requiring changes in company structure, culture and management. An example of transformational change is the change in an organizational structure and culture from the traditional top & down, hierarchical structure to a large amount of self & directing teams. In some case it is more appropriate to pursue incremental change rather than transformational change. Incremental change is very efficient when an organization want to be cautious in modifying its strategies, and policies. using incremental change method allows organizations to take less risks when changing their existing structure. When there is any risk in changing an organizations structure ,transformational change is not appropriate. When you hear the word change, it’s often the most ground breaking ideas that spring to mind. But in actual fact, the majority of change (around 70%) is incremental change. Incremental change involves making small scale improvements to add or sustain value to existing products, services and processes. This can be simple as adding a new feature to an existing product or it can be more complex, for example developing a line extension. One of its key elements is that it harness existing technology and an existing business model so it’s often easier to execute than breakthrough or radical change. Despite being the most common type, incremental change often doesn’t get the recognition it deserves. We’re profiling 4 great examples of incremental change from Gillette, Coca-Cola, Cadbury and Sainsbury’s. 1.GILLETTE You might not think of Gillette as one of the great innovation leaders but in actual fact, the brand is a great example of a company that has used incremental change to stay ahead of the competition. Gillette razors started life with a single blade but their product has evolved, adding different features and more blades as the company has sought to better meet customer needs. 2. COCA-COLA Another great example comes from Coca-Cola. The brand’s line extensions such as Cherry Coke, Coke with Lime and more recently Coca-Cola Life have enabled a 130 year old brand to stay relevant, tap into emerging trends and bring something new to its customers over the years. 3.CADBURY Like Coca-Cola, Cadbury has innovated through introducing line extensions. As well as developing new flavours, the brand has also created new formats. Take Wispa as an example: the popular chocolate bar is now available as a hot chocolate and a snacking bag. By using an incremental approach to change, Cadbury has been able to open up additional sources of revenue. 4. SAINSBURY’S Incremental change doesn’t just apply to products, it affects services too. Sainsbury’s has evolved its delivery service so that online shoppers can receive their goods more quickly. Just the other week, the supermarket giant announced that it was trialing same-day delivery – a move that will help the brand to meet rising customer needs. Disruptive change is a non-localized future irreversible and change that affects a portion of an industry. This can be caused by changes in market trends causing a shift in the mode of production to fit the customer demands. A good example of disruptive change is in the introduction of mobile phones against the regular analogue phones. At first, the mobile phone had poor sound quality and was expensive.
As the time passed, the mobile phones became cheaper, had
improved sound quality and as they were also portable, it eventually displaced the analogue phones. From this example and many other innovations, it is clear that disruptive changes suffer from an initial lower performance from the mainstream market. Despite this, it prospers in a given market niche due to the new performances that it brings and as the performance parameters are greatly improved, the traditional method is eventually displaced. Disruption change usually affects many companies and the effects that they leave behind depend on the preparedness of the business in dealing with it and the way it is handled generally. Many businesses are swallowed and never to be seen again while others emerge successfully. There are also those that will do their business as usual and struggle through the change while others simply quit the industry because they are unable to deal with the change. These consequences come as a result of the way people respond to a disruptive change. For instance, others will try and deny the disruption and do nothing about it while those that are smart will act and try to minimize the disruption and there will be those that will recognize the disruption but fail to appreciate its magnitude. Whatever the result, the fact is that the change is inevitable and only the strong ones survive it. Nokia; We all know of Nokia to be a manufacturer of mobile telephones. But Nokia was originally founded in Finland in 1865 as a pulp mill (for making paper). It expanded into electrical generation, then into manufacturing rubber products and cables. It wasn’t until the late 1960’s that Nokia became involved in communication and other business equipment and, eventually, into mobile telephones. In the late 1980’s and 1990’s, Nokia divested itself of its founding business units. Transformation: pulp, rubber, and cables to electronic devices. These business and marketing change drivers are: 1. Ever Changing Technology:
This is the digital age and therefore, information age. The
industrial world of past was featured by mass production and consumption, the stores filled with inventories, advertising everywhere, and liberal discounting. The changed information age promises to leading to more accurate levels of production, more targeted communications and more relevant pricing. The business has termed electronic where much of the business is carried on electronic networks intranet, extranets and the internet. Technology which is fast changing is responsible for reducing business costs, improving the quality, and increasing the quantity where products are within each reach of consumers of even lowest income. Globalisation: The local and national markets are turned into global markets where the companies are able market their products and services in other countries of the world at best prices of best quality and in required quantities. This has been possible because of revolutionary changes in the means of transportations, shipping, and communication. This made luxuries of the past as the comforts and necessities in the present day situation. Deregularisation: To take advantage of international market, many countries have deregualised the industries and commerce with a view to create more and more growth opportunities and higher degree of competitive strengths. More and more foreign companies are engaged in industrial and commercial activities of both goods and services which were held at bay. This has led to further opening and widening that brings in more foreign capital and latest technology one hand and generating gainful employment opportunities which in turn support the increasing demand and supply conditions. Privatisation is at its best now. Governments of various countries have realized that it pays to privatise the industrial and commercial sectors of their economies. In case of India, we have privatisation of services namely, banking, airways, roadways, shipping, insurance power, infrastructural activities and even defence products. Public sector is shrinking for better that has led to improved efficiency and profitability. Customer Empowerment: Customers of these days are expecting higher quality service and a degree of customerization on an increasing scale. They demand more convenience as they have problem of time management as they have been the part of rat race of earning decent living. As a result they perceive lesser real product differences and portray less brand loyalty. They are exposed to extensive product information from internet and other sources that permit them to shop more intelligently. They are showing greater price sensitivity in their search for value. Customerisation: The companies are producing individually differentiated products whether they are ordered in person, on phone or on line. By going on line, the companies are enabling the consumers to design their own specifications of a given product to meet their individual requirements. As a result, the companies have the capacity to interact with each customer personally so that there is a possibility of personalizing messages, services, and the relationship, in addition to individualized product designs. By using smart software and the latest manufacturing equipment, a marketing house can increasingly increase their sales. As orders will be cut- to-order, the companies need not invest too much in unwanted inventories. Intense Competition: Today brand manufacturers are facing heightened and tougher competition both from domestic and foreign brands that has resulted in rising promotion costs and shrinking profit margins. Further, they are slapped by powerful retailers who command limited shelf-space and are putting out their own store brands in competition with national brands. The industry boundaries are getting blurred at an increasingly incredible rate as companies are recognising that new opportunities are at the intersection of two or more industries. In the past the companies remained in only in core area or areas. Now it is not so. For instance pharmaceutical companies of past were purely chemical companies. Now they have been adding closely allied lines for taking full advantage of synergy. They are adding bio-genetic research capacities in order to formulate new drugs, new cosmetics (cosmoneuticals) and new foods (nutriceuticals). It is not a surprise when Cosmetics Company adds dermatology drugs to its port-folio. What is true of these pharmaceutical companies is true of other lines. There is a convergence of comparing and consumer electronics industries where companies like Dell, Hewlett- Packard, and Gateway released a flow of entertainment devices right from MP3 players to plasma TVs and camcorders. Retail Transformation: Small retailers are now facing a “do or die” situation because there is growth of powerful giant retailers both from home and abroad. India’s millions of small stores are terrified of the onslaught from domestic and foreign retailers. These store based retailers are facing growing competition from catalog houses, direct mart firms, newspaper, magazine, and T.V direct to consumer ads, home shopping T.V., and e-commerce on the internet. In response, these entrepreneurial retailers are building entertainment into stores with coffee bars, lectures, demonstrations and performances. That is they are marketing an ‘experience’ than a product assortment. The success of the established online companies of the world namely, AOL, Amazon, Yahoo, eBay, E’TRACE and the like is quite amazing. They are known for creating disintermediation in the delivery of products and services, virtually struck, terror in the hearts of many established manufacturers and retailers. In response to disintermediation, good many traditional companies engaged in reinter mediation and became what is called as “brick-and click”, adding online services to their existing offers. Many brick-and click competitors became stranger. Contenders than pure “click” firms since they had a larger pool, of resources to work and work established brand names. In such a situation that has undergone a thorough change, the marketers have to be very agile and alert and take steps forward only on conforming that it is safer and profitable to do so. The changing marketing environment All businesses operate within an environment of change. One of the most important aspects of change is change in the market place as customers become more demanding. Marketing is the process which involves identifying existing customer needs and requirements and with anticipating future changes. It is therefore a dynamic discipline. The marketing environment for most, if not all, products changes regularly. The challenge facing the marketer is, therefore, to find out as much as possible about this changing environment so that the business can respond in a appropriate way. This remains true for any company regardless of the industry, from a bottle of car oil to a Fast Moving Consumer Good (FMCG) such as a bar of chocolate or a packet of soap powder. Because Castrol products are designed to complement high quality engines the company works closely with Original Engine Manufacturers (OEMs) such as BMW, VW/Audi, Ford, Jaguar and Toyota to develop high quality lubricants that are tailored to meeting the requirements of modern engines. Castrol's marketing research therefore involves finding out detailed information from both the OEM's and motor vehicle users. The desired result of the research is to produce and supply the best quality high technology oils to meet the needs of modern engines. The marketing environment in which Castrol operates is constantly changing because: New engines are continually being developed by the engine manufacturers with new specifications and requirements. Government regulations regularly change. For example in recent years UK and European regulations increasingly require engines to be cleaner and to help to create a cleaner environment. The world is becoming wealthier, and increasingly modern consumers require more sophisticated motoring products. More and more consumers are buying more luxurious and sophisticated vehicles. To complement this purchase they require the best quality oils. Castrol's response to these changes is to provide oils which are technically superior to anything else on the market, and which are market focused. Volatility is a statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index. In most cases, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security. Volatility can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index. In the securities markets, volatility is often associated with big swings in either direction. For example, when the stock market rises and falls more than one percent over a sustained period of time, it is called a "volatile" market. Market volatility can be seen through the VIX or Volatility Index. The VIX was created by the Chicago Board Options Exchange as a measure to gauge the 30-day expected volatility of the U.S. stock market derived from real-time quote prices of S&P 500 call and put options. It is effectively a gauge of future bets investors and traders are making on the direction of the markets or individual securities. A high reading on the VIX implies a risky market. A variable in option pricing formulas showing the extent to which the return of the underlying asset will fluctuate between now and the option's expiration. Volatility, as expressed as a percentage coefficient within option-pricing formulas, arises from daily trading activities. How volatility is measured will affect the value of the coefficient used. Volatility refers to the amount of uncertainty or risk related to the size of changes in a security's value. A higher volatility means that a security's value can potentially be spread out over a larger range of values. This means that the price of the security can change dramatically over a short time period in either direction. A lower volatility means that a security's value does not fluctuate dramatically, and tends to be more steady. Volatility is often calculated using variance and standard deviation. The standard deviation is the square root of the variance. Suppose that an investor is building a retirement portfolio. Since she is retiring within the next few years, she's seeking stocks with low volatility and steady returns. She considers two companies: Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a beta coefficient of 1.03, which makes it roughly as volatile as the S&P 500 index. Shopify Inc. (SHOP) has a beta coefficient of 1.88, making it significantly more volatile than the S&P 500 index. (The S&P 500,[6] just the S&P,[7][8]is an American stock market index based on the market capitalizations of 500 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ, or the Cboe BZX Exchange.) The investor would likely choose Microsoft Corporation for their portfolio since it has less volatility and more predictable short-term value. Evolution-Transformational change implemented gradually through inter-related initiatives, likely to be proactive change undertaken in anticipation of the need for future change. Adaptation : Change undertaken to realign the way in which the organization operates, implemented in a series of steps. Revolution: Transformational change that occurs via simultaneous initiatives on many fronts. Reconstruction : Change undertaken to realign the way in which the organization operates with many initiatives implemented simultaneously. EXTENT OF CHANGE
3One of the largest oil companies in the world, Halliburton has been accused of a number of grave offenses. These include doing business with countries with which the US government has banned trade relations, overcharging the US army for supplies during the Iraq War in 2003, mismanaging waste, sexual assault, and exposing employees to hazardous chemicals. The internet, and particularly social media, have given consumers a greater voice. Many people are choosing to speak out about what they consider to be unethical business practices. This can cause severe damage to a company’s image and damage brand loyalty. Consumers also understand that money speaks — that they have the purchasing power to buy from businesses they consider ethical.