Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1872
Contract
CONTRACT
A voluntary, deliberate, and legally binding
agreement between two/more competent parties.
Usually written but may be spoken or implied,
and generally have to do with employment, sale
or lease, or tenancy.
A contractual relationship is evidenced by
– An offer (Proposal),
– Acceptance of the offer, and
– Valid (legal and valuable) consideration.
Each party to a contract acquires rights & duties
relative to the rights & duties of the other parties.
While all parties may expect a fair benefit from
the contract (otherwise courts may set it aside
as inequitable) it does not follow that each party
will benefit to an equal extent.
PROPOSAL : S2(a), When one person
signifies to another his willingness to do or
to abstain from doing anything, with a
view to obtaining the assent of that other to
such act or abstinence, he is said to make
a proposal.
Types of Offer
Express offer
Implied offer
Specific offer
General offer
Cross offer
Counter offer
Standing offer
Express Offer: - Offer is given to another person
either in writing or in oral.
Implied Offer: - Offer is given to another person
neither in writing nor in oral.
Specific Offer:Offer is given to a specific person.
General Offer: Offer is to entire world at a large.
Cross Offer: - When both the persons are
making identical offers to each other in ignorance
of other’s offer.
Counter Offer: When both the persons are
making offers to each other which are not
identical in ignorance of other’s offer.
Standing Offer: An offer which remains
continuously enforceable for a certain period.
LEGAL RULES FOR OFFER
Offer must be given with an intention to
create a legal relationship.
Offer must be definite.
There is a clear cut difference between
offer, invitation to offer, invitation to
sale.
Offer must be communicated.
Mere statement of price is not an offer.
Acceptance
S2(b): When a person made a proposal
to another to whom proposal is made,
if proposal is assented there to, it is
called acceptance.
LEGAL RULES FOR ACCEPTANCE
•Acceptance must be given as per the mode
prescribed by the offerer.
• Acceptance must be given before the lapse of time
or within reasonable time.
• Acceptance must be unconditional.
• Acceptance may be given by;
• any person in case of general offer.
•any specific person in case of specific offer.
• Acceptance must be communicated.
• Mental acceptance is no acceptance or
acceptance must not be derived from silence.
• Acceptance must not be precedent to offer.
Consideration
CONSIDERATION
Definition : S2(d): “when at the desire of
the promisor or promisee or any other
person has done or abstained from
doing or does or abstains from doing
,or promises to do or to abstain from
doing , something , such an act or
abstinence or promise is called a
consideration for the promise .
No Consideration No Contract
Capacity to
Contract
CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
Condition for a person to enter into
contract;
He must be major
He must be sound mind
He must not be disqualified by any
other law.
Disqualified Persons to Enter Into a
Contract;
Minor
Unsound person
Others ie alien enemy, insolvent, convict,
coy/ corporation against MOA/ AOA .
MINOR
Indian Majority Act S (3): Minor is
any person under the age of 18 yrs.
In the following cases a person is said
to be minor if he does not complete
the age of 21 years
– Any person under the Guardian & Wards
Act ,1890
– Any person which comes under
superintendence of law/ legal representative.
Rules Governing Minor’s Agreement
Rule 1 : Judges are counselors, jury is the
servant , law is the guardian.
Rule 2: In case minor entered into a
contract which is unlawful , illegal , immoral
he is also prosecutable & punishable under
the relevant law.
UNSOUND PERSON
S 12: a person generally sound ,
occasionally unsound can enter into
a contract when he of sound mind
A person generally unsound
occasionally sound can enter into
contract when he is sound mind
Discharge by performance.
Discharge by agreement or consent.
Discharge by impossibility of
performance.
Discharge by lapse of time.
Discharge by operation of law.
Discharge by breach of contract.
DISCHARGE BY PERFORMANCE
DISCHARGE BY OPERATION
Death
OF LAW
Merger
Insolvency
Unauthorised alteration of the terms of a
written agreement
Rights & liabilities vesting in the same person
DISCHARGE BY BREACH OF
CONTRACT
It is a legal cause of action and type of
civil wrong, in which, a binding agreement
or bargained for exchange, is not
honoured by the party (ies) to contract by
non performance or interference with the
other party’s performance.
Actual Breach :
At the time of performance
During the performance
Anticipatory Breach
By the act of promisor (implied repudiation)
By renunciation of obligation (express
repudiation)
Remedies
for
Breach of Contract
BREACH OF CONTRACT
Legal cause of action.
Civil wrong.
Binding Agreement : Non-
performance/ interference with
other party’s performance.
REMEDIES OF INJURED
PARTY
A remedy is a means given by law
for the enforcement of a right
Following are the remedies
– Rescission of damages.
– Suit upon quantum meruit.
– Suit for specific performance.
– Suit for injunction.
RESCISSION
When a contract is broken by one party, the
other party may sue to treat the contract as
rescinded and refuse further performance. In
such a case, he is absolved of all his obligations
under the contract.
The court may give rescission due to;
contract is voidable.
contract is unlawful.
The court may refuse to rescind if ;
Plaintiff has ratified the contract.
Parties cannot be restored to the original position.
The third party has acquired for value.
When only a part is sought to be rescinded (Ref S
27 of Specific Relief Act 1937).
DAMAGES
Damages are a monetary compensation allowed
to the injured party by the court for the loss or
injury suffered by him by the breech of the
contract. The objective of awarding damages for
the breach of contract is to put the injured party
in the same position as if he had not been
injured. This is called Doctrine of Restitution.
The fundamental basis is awarding damages for the
pecuniary loss.
Restitution means restoration. It is based on the
noble principle that a person should not be allowed
to unjustly enrich himself at the expense of
another. Therefore, when a contract becomes void,
the party who has received any benefit under it
must restore it to the other party or must
compensate the other party by the value of benefit.
QUANTUM MERUIT
quantum meruit is a Latin phrase meaning
"what one has earned".
In the context of contract law, it means
something along the lines of "reasonable value
of services".
A reasonable sum of money to be paid for
services rendered or work done when the
amount due is not stipulated in a legally
enforceable contract.
A right to sue on a quantum meruit arises when
a contract, partly performed by one party, has
been discharged by breach of contract by the
other party.
This right is performed not on original contract
but on implied promise by other party for what
has been done.
EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM MERUIT
Person A (plaintiff ) tells neighbuor B (defendant)
that he is going to build a wall on their property
that will give a benefit to both A and B.
A implies that it would be cheaper for both of
them if A performs the labor instead of hiring a
professional.
B agrees that the wall should be built, but no
price is negotiated.
A builds the wall, and then asks B to compensate
him for the benefit of the wall that he conferred on
B (usually half the value of the wall). B refuses.
A is entitled to some compensation based
on quantum meruit, because there was an implied
promise between A and B, because A was acting
under the assumption that B would pay for part of
his services.
EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM MERUIT
(contd)
A contractor is contracted to work on a school.
Contractor does some work but then quits
(breach of contract). Contractor is entitled to be
paid for the services he has already provided
for the school on the basis of quantum
meruit (however the school may be entitled to
damages arising out of the need to look for a
new contractor).
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
When damages are not an adequate remedy,
the court may, direct the party in breach to
carry out his promise according to terms of the
contract. This is a direction by the court for
specific performance of the contract at the
suit of the party not in breach.