Underground Pillar Design and Stress Analysis

TA 4121 – Underground Stability
UNDERGROUND
PILLAR DESIGN
Ridho K. Wattimena
05
05
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
 Pillar design is one of the most important issues in the field

of underground mine ground control.
 In general, there are three major steps in pillar design:
1. Determination of expected stress on the pillar
throughout its service life.
2. Determination of pillar strength.
3. Determination of Factor of Safety.
05 @RKW
05
PILLAR STRESS
PILLAR STRESS
Pillar stress depends on a number of factors:

 the in-situ stress conditions
 the mining induced stress changes
 the effects of geological features, such as faults and jointing
 the shape and orientation of pillars
 the spatial relationship between pillars and mine openings
 the effects of ground water
05 @RKW
Room-and-Pillar
Mining Method
Longwall
Mining Method
05 @RKW
Pillar layout for extraction of an inclined orebody

(Brady & Brown, 2005)
05 @RKW
Tributary Area
 Babcock et al. (1981) state that Bunting (1911) was the

first author to introduce the tributary area method for the
determination of average pillar stress.
 Agapito (1972) however stated that the tributary area
theory stemmed from an investigation into stress analysis
utilizing photoelastic techniques
 Tributary area theory assumes that a pillar will support its
“share” of the applied load.
05 @RKW
Tributary Area Concept
 WO = Opening width
 WP = Pillar width
 LP = Pillar length
05 @RKW
Tributary Area Concept
 Pillar load (P)

P  ( LP  WO )  (WP  WO )  s V
 Pillar stress (sP)
( LP  WO )  (WP  WO )  s V
sP  (flat seam)
( LP  WP )
( LP  WO )  (WP  WO )  s V
sP   (cos   sin  )
( LP  WP )
(inclined seam, dipping  degree)
05 @RKW
Pariseau (1982)
1  K 0   1  K 0  cos2  1  K 0 sin 2 

H  H 
sP  2 tP  2
1  R  1  R 
sP = average normal pillar stress
tP = average shear pillar stress
 = unit weight of overburden
H = depth below surface
K0 = ratio of in-situ horizontal to vertical stress
R = extraction ratio
 = dip of seam
05 @RKW
Szwilski (1982)
LP  S W f 
 2WP  3S
s P  H 
2WP LP
sP = average pillar stress

WP = pillar width
LP = pillar length
S = spacing of chain pillar
Wf = width of face
05 @RKW
05
Szwilski (1982)
@RKW
Hedley & Grant (1972)
H cos 2    s h sin 2  
sP 
1  R 
R = extraction ratio
sh = in situ horizontal stress
 = dip of ore body
05 @RKW
Whittaker & Singh (1979)
9.81  w 2 cot   
sP   w  W   H 
2    w W/H < 2(tan)
1000w  4  

s P  9.81w  wH  H 2 tan   W/H > 2(tan)

 = angle of shear of roof strata at edge of longwall
extraction measured from the vertical
w = width of barrier pillar
W = width of longwall extraction
05 @RKW
Numerical Methods
 Numerical methods can be used to determine pillar stress

distributions. This approach is used in situations where the
conditions around a mining scenario are sufficiently
complex that tributary area theory cannot be relied upon to
provide adequate results.
 Numerical methods can also be used as a design tool.
Failure criteria and strength parameters can be utilised in
various modelling programs and the predicted rock mass
response can be analysed. Failure analysis can take place as
either a post processing routine or by an interactive
method.
05 @RKW
05
PILLAR STRENGTH
PILLAR STRENGTH
 Empirical methods, which rely on experience, combined

with geotechnical terms related to pillar stability, to
develop a strength formula.
 Theoretical methods, which are derived mathematically
to describe the expected performance of mine pillars
subject to loading for a given set of input variables.
 Heuristic methods, which can generally be considered as
“rule of thumb” techniques for designing pillars that may
disregard many of the valid input parameters related to
pillar strength.
05 @RKW
Pillar Empirical Design Method
 A number of empirical methods for pillar strength

determination have been developed by various
researchers:
 Linear Shape Effect Formula
 Power Shape Effect Formula
 Size Effect Formula
 Hoek & Brown Failure Criterion
05 @RKW
Linear Shape Effect Formula
  w 
Ps  K   A  B 
  h 
Ps = pillar strength
K = strength constant related to pillar material
w = pillar width
h = pillar height
A, B = empirically derived constants, A+B=1.0
05 @RKW
  w 
Ps  K   A  B 
  h 
Source A B w/h range

Bunting (1911) 0.700 0.300 0.5-1.0
Obert & Duvall (1967) 0.778 0.222 0.5-2.0
Bieniawski (1968) 0.556 0.444 1.0-3.1
van Heerden (1974) 0.704 0.296 1.1-3.4
Bieniawski (1975) 0.64 0.36 1.0-3.1
Sorenson & Pariseau (1978) 0.693 0.307 0.5-2.0
05 @RKW
  w 
Ps  K   A  B 
  h 
What is K?
 Unconfined compressive strength of a cubical pillar
specimen (Obert & Duvall, 1967)
 Unconfined compressive strength of a cubical pillar
specimen 30 cm square (Bieniawski, 1975)
05 @RKW
(Hudyma, 1988)
05 @RKW
Power Shape Effect Formula
proposed by Zern (1926), Holland (1956), and Hazen & Artler

(1976).
w
Ps  K 
h
K = unconfined compressive strength of a 30 cm
cubical pillar specimen
w = pillar width
h = pillar height
05 @RKW
Size Effect Formula
wa
Ps  K 
hb
K = strength constant related to pillar material
w = pillar width
h = pillar height
a, b = empirically derived constants
05 @RKW
Size Effect Formula
wa
Ps  K 
hb
Source a b
Steart (1954) 0.5 1.0
Holland-Gaddy (1962) 0.5 1.0
Greenwald et al. (1939) 0.5 0.833
Hedley & Grant (1972) 0.5 0.75
Salamon & Munro (1967) 0.46 0.66
Bieniawski (1968) 0.16 0.55
Sheorey et al. (1987)*) 0.5 0.86
*) slender pillars
05 @RKW
05
FOS OF PILLAR
FOS of Pillar
Ps
FOS 
sP
Assumptions
 The seam is subjected only to vertical pressure, which is
constant over the mined area.
 Each pillar supports the column of rock over an area that is
the sum of the cross-sectional area of the pillar plus a
portion of the room area.
 The load is uniformly distributed over the cross-sectional
area of the pillar.
05 @RKW
FOS of Pillar
Ps
FOS 
sP
However,
 Stress is not evenly distributed over the cross section of an
individual pillar.
 Stress on pillars increases with percentage extraction.
 Stress distribution in pillars depends upon the ratio of
pillar width to pillar height.
05 @RKW
05
AN EXAMPLE
Mohan et al. (2001)
h w wO Sp sp
Pillar ID Mine w/h Sp/sp Stability

(m) (m) (m) (MPa) (MPa)
1 Bellampalli 3.0 5.4 1.80 6.0 9.64 4.01 2.40 Stable
2 Nimcha 6.0 9.9 1.65 6.0 7.85 3.09 2.54 Stable
3 Morganpit 3.0 8.1 2.70 3.6 11.89 14.08 0.84 Stable
4 Ramnagar 2.7 9.9 3.67 6.6 8.75 5.20 1.68 Stable
5 Lachhipur 5.1 7.2 1.41 3.9 5.43 2.25 2.41 Stable
6 N. Salanpur 5.1 9.0 1.76 6.0 4.01 2.08 1.93 Stable
7 Bankola 4.8 10.1 2.10 2.4 6.92 3.90 1.77 Stable
8 Bankola 3.0 6.3 2.10 4.2 7.79 5.20 1.50 Stable
9 Surakacchar 3.5 16.0 4.57 4.0 10.07 4.14 2.43 Stable
10 Lachhipur 5.1 18.3 3.59 4.2 7.93 1.43 5.55 Stable
11 Sripur 4.8 40.0 8.33 5.0 21.73 8.41 2.58 Stable
12 E. Angarapatra 2.1 6.0 2.86 6.0 6.00 3.00 2.00 Stable
13 Kargali Incline 3.6 9.3 2.58 7.2 8.62 2.34 3.68 Stable
14 Jamaboda 6 and 7 2.0 5.8 2.90 5.5 8.60 7.59 1.13 Stable
15 Topsi 1.8 7.0 3.89 3.9 12.83 5.15 2.49 Stable
05 @RKW
Mohan et al. (2001)
h w wO Sp sp
Pillar ID Mine w/h Sp/sp Stability

(m) (m) (m) (MPa) (MPa)
16 Amritnagar 4.5 3.6 0.80 5.7 6.85 5.01 1.37 Failed
17 Amritnagar 6.0 3.6 0.60 5.4 5.93 4.68 1.27 Failed
18 Begonia 3.0 3.9 1.30 6.0 5.07 5.80 0.87 Failed
19 Amlai 5.4 4.5 0.83 4.5 3.49 3.61 0.97 Failed
20 Sendra Bansjora 8.1 4.7 0.57 5.6 2.59 2.77 0.94 Failed
21 W. Chirimiri 3.8 5.4 1.44 6.0 8.15 8.12 1.00 Failed
22 Birsingpur 3.6 7.5 2.08 6.0 8.11 10.45 0.78 Failed
23 Pure Kajora 3.6 5.4 1.50 6.0 6.23 6.02 1.03 Failed
24 Pure Kajora 3.6 5.0 1.38 6.5 6.08 7.43 0.82 Failed
25 Shankarpur 4.8 4.5 0.94 4.5 5.46 4.20 1.30 Failed
26 Ramnagar 1.8 2.9 1.58 3.2 6.43 7.76 0.83 Failed
27 Ramnagar 1.8 3.0 1.67 3.6 6.48 6.17 1.05 Failed
28 Kankanee 6.6 19.8 3.00 4.2 6.98 5.88 1.19 Failed
29 Kankanee 8.4 18.6 2.21 5.4 5.03 5.83 0.86 Failed
05 @RKW
2016 IJRMMS Publications on Pillar
1. An approach to model the strength of coal pillars

R. Bertuzzi, K. Douglas, G. Mostyn

2. Stability of a coal pillar for strip mining based on an elastic-
plastic analysis
W. Gao W, M. Ge
3. Back analysis of a pillar monitoring experiment at 2.4 km
depth in the Sudbury Basin, Canada
G. Walton, M. Diederichs, A. Punkkinen, J. Whitmore
4. Numerical investigation of coal pillar failure under
simultaneous static and dynamic loading.
S-L. Wang, S-P Hao, Y. Chen, J-B. Bai, X-Y. Wang, Y. Xu
05 @RKW
5. Rib/snook design in mechanised depillaring of

rectangular/square pillars
R. Singh, A. Kumar, A.K. Singh, J. Coggan, S. Ram
6. Average vertical stress on irregular elastic pillars estimated
by a function of the relative extraction ratio
T. Hauquin, O. Deck, Y. Gunzburger
05 @RKW
1. Longwall chock sudden closure incident below coal pillar of

adjacent upper mined coal seam under shallow cover in the

Shendong coalfield
J. Ju, J. Xu, W. Zhu
2. Influence of backfill on coal pillar strength and floor
bearing capacity in weak floor conditions in the Illinois
Basin
T. Kostecki, A.J.S. Spearing
3. Stability assessment of stope sequence scenarios in a
diminishing ore pillar
S. Shnorhokian, H.S. Mitri, L. Moreau-Verlaan
05 @RKW
1. Study on the width of the non-elastic zone in inclined coal

pillar for strip mining

G. Wei
2. Modelling 3D crack propagation in hard rock pillars using a
synthetic rock mass approach
Y. Zhang, D. Stead
3. Predicting the stability of hard rock pillars using
multinomial logistic regression
R.K. Wattimena
4. Strength reduction on saturation of coal and coal measures
rocks with implications for coal pillar strength
B.A. Poulsen, B. Shen, D.J. Williams, C. Huddlestone-Holmes,
N. Erarslan, J. Qin
05 @RKW
5. Investigation and analysis of the rock burst mechanism

induced within fault–pillars

Z. Li, L. Dou, W. Cai, G. Wang, J. He, S. Gong, Y. Ding
6. Field investigation of long-term bearing capacity of strip
coal pillars
S. Chen, W. Guo, H. Zhou, B. Shen, J. Liu
7. An intelligent approach to predict pillar sizing in designing
room and pillar coal mines
E. Ghasemi, M. Ataei, K. Shahriar
05 @RKW
1. Fracturing of an Euler–Bernoulli beam in coal mine pillar

extraction
C.P. Please, D.P. Mason, C.M. Khalique, J.M.T. Ngnotchouye,
A.J. Hutchinson, J.N. van der Merwe, H. Yilmaz
2. Web pillar design approach for Highwall Mining extraction
J.L. Porathur, S. Karekal, P. Palroy
3. Subsidence risk assessment of decommissioned bord-and-
pillar collieries
B.A. Poulsen, B. Shen
4. Developing coal pillar stability chart using logistic
regression
R.K. Wattimena, S. Kramadibrata, I.D. Sidi, M.A. Azizi
05 @RKW
5. Determination of the minimum thickness of crown pillar

for safe exploitation of a subsea gold mine based on

numerical modelling
X. Li, D. Li, Z. Liu, G. Zhao, W. Wang
05 @RKW
1. Stability of the parting between coal pillar workings in level

contiguous seams during depillaring

R. Singh, S.K. Singh, A. Kushwaha, A. Sinha
2. Assessment of roof fall risk during retreat mining in room
and pillar coal mines
E. Ghasemi, M. Ataei, K. Shahriar, F. Sereshki, S.E. Jalali, A.
Ramazanzadeh
3. Measuring pillar width in trona mines using a body wave
based in-seam seismic technique
M. Ge, H. Wang, A. Schissler, R. Ramani
4. A probabilistic extension to the empirical ALPS and ARMPS
systems for coal pillar design
D. Recio-Gordo, R. Jimenez
05 @RKW
THANK YOU VERY MUCH

Underground Pillar Design and Stress Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Underground Pillar Design and Stress Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TA 4121 – Underground Stability

 Pillar design is one of the most important issues in the field

Pillar stress depends on a number of factors:

Pillar layout for extraction of an inclined orebody

 Babcock et al. (1981) state that Bunting (1911) was the

 Pillar load (P)

 Pillar stress (sP)

1  K 0   1  K 0  cos2  1  K 0 sin 2 

sP = average pillar stress

sP = average normal pillar stress

 Numerical methods can be used to determine pillar stress

 Empirical methods, which rely on experience, combined

 A number of empirical methods for pillar strength

Source A B w/h range

proposed by Zern (1926), Holland (1956), and Hazen & Artler

Pillar ID Mine w/h Sp/sp Stability

Pillar ID Mine w/h Sp/sp Stability

1. An approach to model the strength of coal pillars

R. Bertuzzi, K. Douglas, G. Mostyn

5. Rib/snook design in mechanised depillaring of

1. Longwall chock sudden closure incident below coal pillar of

adjacent upper mined coal seam under shallow cover in the

1. Study on the width of the non-elastic zone in inclined coal

pillar for strip mining

5. Investigation and analysis of the rock burst mechanism

induced within fault–pillars

1. Fracturing of an Euler–Bernoulli beam in coal mine pillar

5. Determination of the minimum thickness of crown pillar

for safe exploitation of a subsea gold mine based on

1. Stability of the parting between coal pillar workings in level

contiguous seams during depillaring

You might also like