External criticism analyzes the genuineness of a document by examining its form, appearance, authorship, and textual circumstances like time and place of origin. Internal criticism examines the meaning and trustworthiness of a document's contents, evaluating the value of its statements and literal meaning through either a positive or negative analysis of the author's good faith, motives, competence, accuracy, and knowledge of the subject covered. Students must apply both external and internal criticism to critically analyze documents.
External criticism analyzes the genuineness of a document by examining its form, appearance, authorship, and textual circumstances like time and place of origin. Internal criticism examines the meaning and trustworthiness of a document's contents, evaluating the value of its statements and literal meaning through either a positive or negative analysis of the author's good faith, motives, competence, accuracy, and knowledge of the subject covered. Students must apply both external and internal criticism to critically analyze documents.
External criticism analyzes the genuineness of a document by examining its form, appearance, authorship, and textual circumstances like time and place of origin. Internal criticism examines the meaning and trustworthiness of a document's contents, evaluating the value of its statements and literal meaning through either a positive or negative analysis of the author's good faith, motives, competence, accuracy, and knowledge of the subject covered. Students must apply both external and internal criticism to critically analyze documents.
The genuineness of document Formand appearance and more particularly to question of authorship and textual circumstances such as time , place and purpose. INTERNAL CRITISM
Sometimes called as “higher critisism”
The meaning and trustworthiness of the contents of the documents. Value and worth of its contents. Its literal meaning and reliability of the statements themselves. May be carried on positively or negatively, the first being the approach of discovering the real meaning of the text and the second that approach with a view to find reasons for disbelieving what the document says thus putting to question the authors good faith, motive, competence, accuracy and even his knowledge on the subject covered.