The document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of historical sources using external and internal criticism. External criticism examines a source's authenticity by assessing its appearance, consistency with the time period, and production process. Internal criticism determines a source's accuracy by carefully analyzing its content and context, including the author's situation and intended audience. Thoroughly criticizing sources is important to avoid distortions and draw reliable conclusions in writing history.
The document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of historical sources using external and internal criticism. External criticism examines a source's authenticity by assessing its appearance, consistency with the time period, and production process. Internal criticism determines a source's accuracy by carefully analyzing its content and context, including the author's situation and intended audience. Thoroughly criticizing sources is important to avoid distortions and draw reliable conclusions in writing history.
The document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of historical sources using external and internal criticism. External criticism examines a source's authenticity by assessing its appearance, consistency with the time period, and production process. Internal criticism determines a source's accuracy by carefully analyzing its content and context, including the author's situation and intended audience. Thoroughly criticizing sources is important to avoid distortions and draw reliable conclusions in writing history.
LESSON 3 EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CRITICSM HISTORICAL METHOD
Historical method refers to the process of
probing primary sources that will be used in writing history. This includes source criticism which studies the external and internal validity of sources. Historical Sources Includes: Documents Artifacts Archeologist sites features Oral transmissions Stone inscription Paintings Recorded sounds Images (photographs, motion picture), and oral history. Even ancient relics, are historical sources. Evaluation of Historical Sources 1 2 3 Credibility -is defined as “the quality or power of Provenance inspiring belief”. - refers to the Credible Authenticity sources of sources, - it refers to the information, therefore, must proven fact such as entities be reliable that something and processes sources that is legitimate or involved in provide real producing or information that delivering an one can artifact believe to be true. External Criticism
- refers to the authenticity or
genuineness of the document,
- also called Lower Criticism
How is it done?
• Appearance of the source
• Consistency with the historical period • Medium of the source • Quality of the paper and ink used • The grammar/handwriting of the author or creator Methods to examine a primary source • Linguistic • Archeology • Numismatics • Philately • Paleography • DNA technology • Cartography Internal criticism
- to determine if the content is accurate or
reliable. - also, code higher criticism. - It deals with more important matter than external form. How is it done?
• Historians carefully reads the text of the
source for context. • Focus on attention on the author or creator. • Situation surrounding its existence. • Intended audience or reader. Internal and External Criticism Why is it important? • Use of unverified and untruthful historical sources can lead to equality false conclusions. • Without thorough criticism of historical evidences, historical deception and lies will be highly probable (possible). • To avoid historical Distortion Kinds and Repositories of Primary Sources Primary sources may be published or unpublished document. Published documents are those that are intended for public distribution or use, Newspapers, magazines, books, reports, government documents, laws, court decisions, literary works, posters, maps, and advertisement are some of the examples Unpublished documents, unlike published ones, may be difficult to locate as they are kept in private and hence, may not be easily accessed by the public. These documents are also confidential and are restricted from public use like personal letters, which are in the possession of the recipients. Primary sources may also be unwritten These may include oral traditions, oral histories artworks, and artifacts. Traditions and histories or stories transferred through generations may tell us something about the past. Artworks and Artifacts Content and Contextual Analysis Of Selected Primary Sources In The Philippine History Context Analysis – thorough knowledge of what the source is, who produced it, where, when, and why it was produced. Context Analysis considers the following: 1. Historical context of the source - that is the time and place it was written and the situation at a time. 2. Author’s background - intent and authority on the subject 3. Source’s relevance - what is the importance of the written work of the author. Content Analysis – applies appropriate techniques Content Analysis considers the following: • Logical • Based on the Truth • Identify argument • Identify biases • Claims based on the evidences Context Is the source credible?