Impact of Internal communication on Employee Engagement among the staff

members and analysing the Psychological wellbeing of the Employees in a

spinning mill

SANJHANA. R
18MBA122
Objectives of the study:
To know the level of influence factors that have affected the positive superior communication
among the staff members.
To find out the factors that affect the psychological well being of the employees.
To find the relationship between the psychological well being factors.
Need for the study:
The study had broad hypotheses which proposed the impact of internal communication on
employee engagement.
The study aims to provide insight into the relationship between the internal communication and
employee engagement and his components like commitment, discretional effort and
meaningfulness in their work.
Research methodology
RESEARCH DESIGN-descriptive research
SAMPLING METHOD-questionnaire 1- whole Sampling method. Under that, the judgmental
sampling method will be taken.
Questionnaire 2- random sampling
POPULATION-. It was the study about the employees working in the Pallavaa Groups. Employees
with 2 years of experience in the sector were part of the sample. This will enable a better
understanding from the employees about the learning initiatives inside the organization.
 Constructs for questionnaire 1
:

Vigor

Dedication

Absorption

Subordinates superior understanding

Positive superior communication

Subordinate superior communication

Superior openness.

Effective communication

Open communication

Opportunities for upward communication.

Reliability of communication.

Employee commitment

Discretional effort.
Meaningfulness in their work.
Constructs for questionnaire 2 :

Self acceptance.
Self growth.
Purpose in life.
Environmental mastery.
Autonomy .
Positive relation with others.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
For questionnaire 1 :
The analysis is done using 32 respondents across different departments among staff members in a spinning mill.
Exploring the means of the relationship between for internal communication on employee engagement - an empirical assessment at
general insurance companies., it is found that “positive superior communication” has the greatest mean and is considered to be highly
contributing to the impact of internal communication on employee engagement- an empirical assessment in a spinning mill .
Vigor has significant correlation with respect to dedication(0.26), absorption(0.06), subordinates superior understanding(0.11),positive
superior communication(0.15), subordinate superior communication(0.07), superior openness(0.05),effective communication(0.03),
opportunities for upward communication(0.06), reliability of communication(0.06), employee commitment(0.14), meaningfulness in their
work(0.12), discreational effort(0.09).
Dedication has significant correlation with respect to absorption(0.14), subordinates superior understanding(0.08), subordinate superior
communication(0.01), superior openness(0.30), effective communication(0.28), opportunities for upward communication(0.07), reliability
of communication(0.25), employee commitment(0.03), meaningfulness in their work(0.11),discreational effort(0.19).
Absorption has significant correlation with respect to subordinates superior understanding(0.09),positive superior communication(0.01),
subordinate superior communication(0.01), superior openness(0.16),effective communication(0.13), opportunities for upward
communication(0.19), reliability of communication(0.12), employee commitment(0.19), meaningfulness in their work(0.23), discreational
effort(0.15).
Subordinates superior understanding has significant correlation with respect to positive superior communication(0.21), subordinate
superior communication(0.20), superior openness(0.11),effective communication(0.18), opportunities for upward communication(0.19),
reliability of communication(0.38), employee commitment(0.07), meaningfulness in their work(0.31), discreational effort(0.39).
Positive superior communication has significant correlation with respect to subordinate superior communication(0.24), superior
openness(0.08),effective communication(0.04), opportunities for upward communication(0.02), reliability of communication(0.23),
employee commitment(0.21), meaningfulness in their work(0.19), discreational effort(0.36).
Subordinate superior communication has significant correlation with respect to superior openness(0.38),effective
communication(0.17), opportunities for upward communication(0.25), reliability of communication(0.07), employee
commitment(0.22), meaningfulness in their work(0.03), discreational effort(0.37).
Superior openness has significant correlation with respect to effective communication(0.24), opportunities for upward
communication(0.12), reliability of communication(0.20), employee commitment(0.22), meaningfulness in their
work(0.07), discreational effort(0.32).
Effective communication has significant correlation with respect to opportunities for upward communication(0.20),
reliability of communication(0.04), employee commitment(0.44), meaningfulness in their work(0.23), discreational
effort(0.11).
Opportunities for upward communication has significant correlation with respect to reliability of communication(0.10),
employee commitment(0.15), meaningfulness in their work(0.07), discreational effort(0.03).
Reliability of communication has significant correlation with respect to employee commitment(0.23 ), meaningfulness in
their work(0.05), discreational effort(0.02).
Employee commitment has significant correlation with respect to meaningfulness in their work(0.46), discreational
effort(0.14).
Meaningfulness in their work has significant correlation with respect to discreational effort(0.40).
Linear relationship by correlation test

Correlations

SAMEAN SGMEAN PL1 EMMEAN AMEAN PROMEAN

SAMEAN 1
SGMEAN .128 1
PL1 .061 .162 1
EMMEAN .250** .253** -.033 1
AMEAN .020 -.145 -.107 .028 1
PROMEAN .123 .099 -.144 .260** -.058 1
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
For questionnaire 2 :
The analysis is done using 120 respondents across different departments among employees in a
spinning mill.
It is found that there is no significant difference in Martial Status(married/unmarried) of the
psychological well being of employees in a spinning mill.
It is found that there is no significant difference in gender of the psychological wellbeing of
employees in a spinning mill.
There is no homogeneity in psychological well being across the different levels of Age of the
employees in a spinning mill.
There is no homogeneity in psychological well being across the different levels of experience of
the employees in a spinning mill.
Self acceptance has significant correlation with respect to self growth (0.128), purpose in life
(0.061), environmental mastery (0.250), autonomy (0.020), positive relation with others (0.123).
Self growth has significant correlation with respect to, purpose in life (0.162), environmental
mastery (0.253), autonomy (0.145), positive relation with others (0.099).
Purpose in life has significant correlation with respect to environmental mastery (0.033),
autonomy (0.107), positive relation with others (0.144).
Environmental mastery has significant correlation with respect to autonomy (0.28), positive
relation with others (0.260).
Autonomy has significant correlation with respect to positive relation with others (0.058).
Thank you