Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bu Be 2019 SS-6
Bu Be 2019 SS-6
Session-6
ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
1
What is “integrity”?
Root: integrity
integration “integer” whole or entire
integral
Integrity: the quality of moral self-governance (L.S. Paine)
Personal integrity: honesty, reflective, being committed (?)
integrated-self and moral actions
producing right actions
Corporate integrity: responsibility, transparency, accountability
producing right corporate activities that
lead individuals, inside and outside,
to make right decisions and actions.
Market integrity: transparency, accountability
enabling individual members to take
right decisions and actions.
What is “corporate governance”?
Concerned with the in corporate entities.
GOOD
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
“enable”
HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS
Traditional Management Professionalism
Management
r
separation of
ownership
from control
“managerial-
revolution”
Theory of Governance
Basis: firm as a nexus of constantly re-negotiated contracts among individual
factors of production, esp. managers and investors (shareholders).
Agency problem: how “residual risk-bearers”(P) to control “decision makers” (A)
CG: how to put constraints/deterrents on agent (A) in order to reduce misallocation.
Solution: incentives for self-control through efficient markets for corporate control,
management, and information; Rel.: Owner-Manager-BOD (independent dir.)
Weakness: Mgr is in control of BOD and less dependence on owners (managerialism)
sed
Fairness Fairness
Responsibility Responsibility
Transparency Transparency
Accountability Accountability
Independency
The Political Economy of Corporate Governance
The dominant process Dynamic co-evolution
in the history of in the history of
industrial revolution corporation
sustainable
development
Anglo-American model of corporate governance
German/European model of corporate governance
Japanese model of corporate governance
Corporate Governance in Indonesia
Following the Anglo-Saxon but two-tier model
Supporting laws, rules, and policies
UU 8/1995 (pasar modal), UU 40/1997 (PT): implicit calls for GCG
Bapepam SE-03/PM/2000, BEJ 339/2001: GCG for all listed companies
UU 19/2003 (BUMN), Menkeu 11/2004: GCG for all state-owned companies
KNKG 2006: standardization of GCG
Particular focus of interest: separation of BOC’s chairman and CEO
independent commissioners (non exec.)
audit committee
expropriation by major shareholders
Indonesian model of corporate governance
Corporate Governance Comparisons
Characteristics USA UK Germany Japan Indonesia
Driving Shareholder Shareholder Stakeholder Stakeholder Shareholder
Philosophy Value Value Value Value Value
Governance Law, NYSE, Self-regulated Co-determi- Legislation Law, rules
regulation & SEC-rules nation Law
Board Single-tier Single-tier Two-tier Side by side Two-tier
structure (act as 2-tier) (external)
Performance effective and effective and effective effective and formality of
of the board responsive to responsive to monitoring responsive to governance
opportunity opportunity opportunity & super exe?
Board Predominantly 40-60%, but to Mix of stake- Internal small % of
membership external be increasingly holders, 50% except audit external
(80%) more external labor rep.
Monitoring Securities Securities Government Government Sec. markets
institution markets markets Government
Business Explicit code Explicit code Imbedded Imbedded in Imbedded in
ethics of ethics of ethics in law the culture the religion?