Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For Literature Review of Adaptive Case Study
For Literature Review of Adaptive Case Study
the ongoing struggle between preservation and adaptive reuse in the modern design field today, From investigating
the precedent research, a proposal could be made on how to collaborate the differing theories to keep the
integrity of historic buildings in the future, yet also allow for future adaptability to the building and increase
the longevity of building life.
Industrial heritage, urban fabric, cultural space, landmark, canvas, textile mills, Bombay, revitalization, paradigm
shift, adaptable design, preservation, brownfield redevelopment
ADAPTIVE REUSE (TYPES)
Saving Face: Façadism as an Adaptive Reuse strategy?
the present day, when the strain on infrastructure is apparent and resources are dwindling, the concept of reuse has
become quintessential. This is pertinent for land as a resource as well. With the world and its need of growing
manifold, the accommodation of new space has to be catered to. Empty plots of land in the urban fabric are
becoming difficult to find – either for financial reasons or for the sheer lack thereof. It is therefore important to
reuse and recycle existing vacant buildings. Many often these buildings are historic in nature. The grand scale of
these historic structures within an urban setting allow for interventions and adaptations of the spaces.
Globalization has made the quest for identity, a growing topic in the architectural profession. Today, cities from all
around the globe are perceived to be more and more uniform, where in fact each city has its own spirit that has
been and is still being shaped through time. Factors that contribute to shaping this specific character may vary from
one city to another, but the evolutionn is inevitable.
How architecture can make the change of these buildings an informed one; a change that preserves yet enhances
and strengthens the evolving identity of a city. It introduces adaptive reuse as a third alternative approach to pure
preservation.
The paper stresses on the necessity of applying adaptive reuse for a healthier transition in time
ADAPTIVE REUSE (TYPES)
AIMS AND OBJECT OF RESEARCH
• To encourage students to think deeply, critically about relationships of design, sustainability, management and
economy within adaptive reuse.
• analyzise rational for the intervention on existing structures, Understand cultural-, technical, economical- and
sustainability issues related to building adaptation.
• Increasingly steep competition for limited public space endangers the city’s economic health, as well as the
connectivity of the city’s diverse social and cultural components. Often, land uses under the elevated are an
afterthought when a decision is made to construct an elevated highway. Without a thoughtful and concerted
effort toward design and use, these segments of developable land lose their potential to be productive public
spaces, especially in new york city’s undervalued neighbourhoods.
• Creating catalytic solutions to multifaceted planning, policy, and development challenges requires the ability to
engage diverse stakeholders, and tap into multidisciplinary expertise.
• The potential impact of making millions of square feet throughout the five boroughs available for a variety of
public uses is unparalleled.To capture the experiential knowledge of residents who use these spaces on a daily
basis, and hear their suggestions for improvements needed.
ADAPTIVE REUSE (TYPES)
AIMS AND OBJECT OF RESEARCH
• To encourage students to think deeply, critically about relationships of design, sustainability, management and
economy within adaptive reuse.
• analyzise rational for the intervention on existing structures, Understand cultural-, technical, economical- and
sustainability issues related to building adaptation.
• Increasingly steep competition for limited public space endangers the city’s economic health, as well as the
connectivity of the city’s diverse social and cultural components. Often, land uses under the elevated are an
afterthought when a decision is made to construct an elevated highway. Without a thoughtful and concerted
effort toward design and use, these segments of developable land lose their potential to be productive public
spaces, especially in new york city’s undervalued neighbourhoods.
• Creating catalytic solutions to multifaceted planning, policy, and development challenges requires the ability to
engage diverse stakeholders, and tap into multidisciplinary expertise.
• The potential impact of making millions of square feet throughout the five boroughs available for a variety of
public uses is unparalleled.To capture the experiential knowledge of residents who use these spaces on a daily
basis, and hear their suggestions for improvements needed.
ADAPTIVE REUSE (DEGREES OF INTERVENTION)
AIMS AND OBJECT OF RESEARCH
• Consider on what basis you would balance the factors involved and how you would decide between these
options.
• Identify some materials and methods in common use that would be wholly inappropriate for use in an historic
context, How might the above results be incorrect when dealing with Modern Movement structures.
• There is also the need to respect all periods of development, identifying each period of intervention and
granting it true place and worth within the palimpsest of the asset’s development over time.
• The choice of method, manner and materials used in any intervention project places a responsibility upon you
to ensure that whatever you decide upon has been thoroughly researched and assessed as appropriate,
creating least damage not only to the fabric of the asset but also to its aesthetic and historic value.
• New materials, their use and technology are constantly being advanced. Some new materials or processes may
well be appropriate for use on or within the historic environment: Some may be positively damaging to it. You
must be aware of these hazards when specifying materials, processes or methods. A full evaluation must
precede any introduction of new materials or processes.
• ISSUES - Some of the issues to be considered were: failure of balcony windows in the residential blocks
(Orchard Court) which were of flush design with no weathering. Choices would have to be made
between replicating the original flush design of the windows, re-creating the same failure potential but
retaining the original appearance, or replacement with different material (such as aluminium or PVCu),
or, alternatively, adopting timber windows with weathering detailing with a concomitant risk of
appearance change detracting from the original design.
ADAPTIVE REUSE (DEGREES OF INTERVENTION)
AIMS AND OBJECT OF RESEARCH
• The strategy provided for a shared framework of understanding, agreed assessment of significance and
vulnerability, management policies and a basis for assessing individual challenges.
SOME OF THE MAJOR WORKS INVOLVED:
• Major repairs to the dome over the Dining Hall
• New external servery
• Replacement of all windows.
• Covering of original ferro cement petals of the roof with insulation (both externally and internally)
• New services in relation to mass concrete floors
• New services and fire precautions provided as part of an integrated, surface mounted design
• Failure of pre-stressed beams along the length of the library and carrying its roof
• Failure of concealed rainwater system and the concomitant challenge of designing a sympathetic external
system
• All these challenges to the principles of conservation philosophy of minimum intervention, minimum
loss of original fabric, minimum loss of authenticity and reversibility of intervention, provided the design
team with massive dilemmas that were overcome by thorough analysis of the building its problems,
aesthetic value and cultural significance and formulating an agreed strategy that permitted the building
to be repaired with only the minimal impact that its problems permitted.
ADAPTIVE REUSE (DEGREES OF INTERVENTION)
• Such factors may be economic; loss of income during intervention works, insurance constraints following
damage to structures. These factors and more will influence the method and manner of intervention and you
must be aware of them and factor them into your intervention strategy.
• Also satisfy the cost, technical and functional constraints of the client, but have minimum impact upon the
historic environment. You must be able to argue the case for conservation, often against the requirements of
modern legislation, societal impositions and, sometimes, against the wishes of a recalcitrant client. This will be
the easier from a position of strength gained through knowledge and clarity of understanding of the historic
environment and its importance to society.
the analysis of form and structure of the existing building as fundamental to the intervention. The mass, the size,
the rhythm and the form of the existing building all provide opportunities for balance or counter points
Preservation/Conservation were used interchangeably to refer to the architectural school of thought that either
encouraged measures that would protect and maintain buildings in their current state, or would prevent further
damage and deterioration to them.
Restoration was the conservationist school of thought that believed historic buildings could be improved, and
sometimes even completed, using current day materials, design, and techniques.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
TERMS USED IN ADAPTIVE REUSE
Preservation, "places a high premium on the retention of all historic fabric through conservation, maintenance and
repair. It reflects a building's continuum over time, through successive occupancies, and the respectful changes and
alterations that are made."
Rehabilitation "emphasizes the retention and repair of historic materials, but more latitude is provided for
replacement because it is assumed the property is more deteriorated prior to work. (Both Preservation and
Rehabilitation standards focus attention on the preservation of those materials, features, finishes, spaces, and
spatial relationships that, together, give a property its historic character.“
Restoration "focuses on the retention of materials from the most significant time in a property's history, while
permitting the removal of materials from other periods.“
Reconstruction, "establishes limited opportunities to re-create a non-surviving site, landscape, building, structure,
or object in all new materials.
Documentation
Documentation is the basis for every study and analysis. Basic documentation in our study referred also to the urban
context so as to capture the project's urban role. Images of the original use (when available) and the current, new
use were used, as well as plans, section and details from both phases of the structure's life. In addition, all case
studies, virtual models were drawn.
ALSO , These are antiques, anchors from the past and yet as for now have been placed in interiors of modern
buildings as accents thus recovering elements from our forefathers for generations to come. This is one iteration of
what is today entitled Adaptive Reuse.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
FIRSTLY, FACTORS AFFECTING ADAPTIVE REUSE
• More and more companies and corporations disrupt by reusing; they retain, they avoid demolishing. Below are
some factors that influence this phenomenon:
• The community`s attention to the site’s social value.
• Identifying its potential use, the physical damage the site has suffered through recent changes balanced with the
potential of a future development. Studies carried out compare the character of the site and its intended new
use.
• Historical importance and terms of street scape. The same location can be adapted to the community way of
living was; a different behavior in the past may greatly influence the present. The community gives a high value
of understanding in preservation of our heritage.
• Topographical location, climate and acceptable conditions of the sites environment are also considered.
• Economic growth is one of the top listed concerns nowadays.this also link to modernisation and developmental
technology. Should be of everyone’s concern, especially our new generation seeking for fast-pace development.
• Historical Character played and still plays a big role due to its influences, the notable designs, previous
constructions methods and relatively different building materials are not overlooked.
• Sustainable development- the most responsive way of dealing between Historical preservation and
modernization
There are several forms of obstruction in the adaptation and reusing phenomenon:
• Historic sites that are being neglected by the government and make it out of existence due to material’s
decomposition.
• Instances in which the government policies are unsafe to the environment and historic places.
• New proposals are being projected for the site.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
There are economic considerations as corporations and companies find ways to sustainable approaches to elevate
the retail value of the site. There are also factors affecting the state of reusing old structures.
• Reuse of existing materials, its physical condition and decaying components. Physical condition of the site and
the structure itself. If there are parts affected by decay and destruction during the time of not using it. To check
what part of the building needs to modify to comply with the current and future building regulations of the
community.
• Resources and the need to produce all new materials – an example to this, is the current state of wooden
components. Older pieces of woods that were installed in olden times may be even stronger today than what is
today available on the market. This durability of wood as a material is highly volatile in time and its condition
greatly influences the possibility of reusing and adapting a building.
• Lessening the use of energy, labor force and machinery during construction.
• Lessening the garbage that can be brought by total demolition.
• Minimizing the funds required the company or the owner in establishing a new site.
• Every project has its economic costs. Some professionals will likely build a new building rather than to renovating
or adapting an old one as this may greatly increase costs yet according to one Canadian developer the
percentage of general savings is of 10 to 12% when we reuse an old building.
• There are some opinions that reused buildings cannot be as profitable as of the new developments.
• All of the issues stated above can be studied thoroughly to meet certain goal for an adaption of old sites.
Standard Criteria
1. Discouraging Faradisms – is referring to demolishing the back part of the building and only retains the façade.
2. Contemporary Designs versus Poor Imitation of Historical Designs – this refers to the new modern designs that
attempt to imitate the old rather than repairing the original design.
3. Consideration of new use as appropriate as of its original use.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
ADVANTAGES OF ADAPTIVE REUSE
1. We can notice that historical sites are commonly situated at the center of the community. This opens up
extraordinary opportunities and naturally guarantees extraordinary already built infrastructure.
2. Historical sites are priceless in value. Hundreds of years of existence and remarkable designs that can
encourage tourism.
3. Each Era had its own method of construction and detailed designs in comparison with modern construction
developments, this cannot be reproduced today entirely.
Making people seeing it, identifying the new endeavor with and old building, identifying the memory of the place
with the current existent state of the site greatly underlines a feeling of appurtenance in the city itself. Making
people seeing it, identifying the new endeavour with and old building, identifying the memory of the place with the
current existent state of the site greatly underlines a feeling of appurtenance in the city itself.
• 40% annual energy and raw materials
• 25% wood harvest
• 16% water supplies
• 44% landfill
• 45% carbon dioxide production
• 50% of total greenhouse emissions from industrialized areas
• While reusing old buildings and the materials contained have a rough estimate of 95% savings for energy that
can be possibly wasted if we demolished those heritage.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
IN INDIAN CONTEXT
The Indian cities are going through difficult times, catering the burgeoning demands of society, economy and the
environment. India is experiencing an unprecedented construction boom
We won’t be left with enough land in our near future to cater the proliferating demand, thus forcing us to grow and
expand our cities beyond control into the agricultural and suburban fabric. These alarming statistics urges building
design professionals to produce more energy efficient buildings and renovate existing stock to meet the
sustainability criteria set by their respective authorities.
an alternative to our ever-increasing throw-away society, adaptive reuse offers a sustainable building site with
existing infrastructure and materials. The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors and barriers that determines
the adaptive re-use potential of buildings in an Indian realm, focussing on developing this as a strategy to design and
build our future cities, which could be re-used and recycled as per the demands of the then society.
ARP MODEL -The internationally accepted Adaptive Re-use Potential (ARP) model is briefly explained along with the
newly introduced rating tool called the adaptSTAR Among them the key driver is rising energy costs, which increases
the cost of new construction (e.g. materials, transport, and resources), compelling the clients to re-use existing
building stock. The Adaptive Re-use Potential (ARP) model by Langston identifies and ranks adaptive re-use potential
in existing buildings. This model requires an estimate of the expected physical life of the building along with its
current age.
• The ARP model predicts effective life as a function of (discounted) physical life and obsolescence, and allows the
calculation of the adaptive reuse potential of a building’s life cycle so that the right timing for intervention can
be applied.
• The decay curve can be reset by strategic capital investment during a renewal process by the current owner, or a
future developer, at key intervals during a building’s life cycle. ARP scores in excess of 50% have high adaptive
reuse potential, scores between 20% and 50% have moderate potential, and scores below 20% have low value,
representing about one-third of the area under the decay curve in each case. Potential means that there is a
propensity for projects to realize economic, social and environmental benefits when adaptive reuse is
implemented.
ADAPTIVE REUSE
ARP MODEL - Where the current building age is close to and less than the useful life, the model identifies that
planning activities should commence .
• ARP is conceptualized as rising from zero to its maximum score at the point of its useful life, and then falling
back to zero as it approaches physical life.
HOW MODERN ASSESSMENT IS DONE IN PROCESSING OF ADAPTIVE REUSE AS PER INTERNATIONAL CRITERIA.
1. Modern measuring techniques, such as photogrammetry (the use of aerial photographs to make maps and
surveys) and stereo photogrammetry, are also used today to increase accuracy, with tape, level and rode.
2. Once the measurements are complete, there is an analysis of the structural stability of the building and its living
pattern of movement. No building is permanently still; soil and wind can affect building stability and need to be
documented.
3. Finally, the architect or surveyor tests the electrical connections, plumbing, and other utilities present in the
building (this is more for historic and re-purposed buildings). For both ancient and historic buildings, lightning
conductors and fire-fighting equipment are checked to make sure they can provide sufficient protection.
4. At the end of this assessment process, the conservator will analyzise all the collected data and decide on a
conservation plan based on available funding sources.
Adaptation also provides indirect value which is the transfer of value of the project to adjacent properties, provides
indirect value which is the transfer of value of the project to adjacent properties.The potential to conserve, provide
long-term sustainable uses, and interpret the heritage values of the place can be integrated into the project, thereby
increasing the potential for long-term benefit
ADAPTIVE REUSE
CASE STUDIES POINT
Find a use which is appropriate to the heritIage significance of the place, Retain the existing use when it is integral to
the heritage significance, A new use should be compatible with heritage significance and involve minimal changes to
significant fabric, layout and setting:
Minimise impact on significant interiors, interior planning (circulation patterns and use of rooms) and decorative
schemes and finishes.
Provide for the change to be reversed and for the place’s future conservation.
Conserve the relationship between the setting and preserve significant views to and from the heritage place.
Provide for the long-term management and viability of the heritage place
Reveal and interpret the heritage significance other place as an integral and meaningful part of the adaptation
project Interpretation communicates the history and previous uses of a building to its occupants and visitors and
helps to explain how and why the adaptive reuse changes have been made.