Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Richard M. Ingersoll
Professor of Education and Sociology
University of Pennsylvania
and
Consortium for Policy Research in Education
The Source of Data
The Schools and Staffing Survey with the
Teacher Follow-up Survey
Conducted by the Census Bureau for the U.S.
Department of Education
5 Cycles: 1987-1989, 1990-1992
1993-1995, 1999-2001
2003-2004 - forthcoming
The largest source of information available on
teachers:
-Sample: 55,000 teachers
12,000 schools
-Representing all 50 states
Percent Secondary Schools with Difficulties
Filling their Teaching Vacancies, by Field.
Mathematics 42
Special Educ 34
Life Science 30
Foreign Lang 29
Physical Science 27
English 24
Music/Art 21
Social Studies 14
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent
Source: Ingersoll, R. 2003. Is There Really a Teacher Shortage? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania,
http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty_research/Shortage-RMI-09-2003.pdf
Percent Annual Teacher Turnover, by Field
Math 16.4
Science 15.6
Special Educ. - Elementary 14.5
Movers
Elementary 14 Leavers
0 10 20 30 40 50
Percent
Numbers of US Teachers in Transition
Before and After 1999-2000 School Year
Entrants
534,861
Teaching Force
3,443,467
Departures
546,411
Source: Ingersoll, R. 2003. Is There Really a Teacher Shortage? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania,
http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty_research/Shortage-RMI-09-2003.pdf
Beginning Teacher Attrition (Cumulative
Percent Teachers Having Left Teaching
Occupation, by Years of Experience)
After 1 year 14
After 2 years 24
After 3 years 33
After 4 years 40
After 5 years 46
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent
Source: Ingersoll, R. 2003. Is There Really a Teacher Shortage? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of
Pennsylvania, http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty_research/Shortage-RMI-09-2003.pdf
Percent Annual Public School
Teacher Turnover, by Selected School
Characteristics
All Public 15
Large/Suburban/Not-
11
poor
Small/Suburban/Not-
Poor 16
Large/Urban/Poor 19
Small/Rural/Poor 22
Small/Urban/Poor 26
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Percent
Percent Teachers Giving Various
Reasons for Their Turnover, by Field
14
Retirement 11
10
To Pursue Other 39
30
Job 36
50
Dissatisfaction 50
62
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent
Of Those School Teachers Who Moved From
or Left Their School, Percent Reporting Various
Sources of Dissatisfaction, by Field
58
Too heavy teaching load 48
48
56
Poor salary or benefits 61
Other
54
Math/Science
50
Class sizes too large 53 Spec.Educ.
49
50
Student behavioral problems 46
45
49
Lack of faculty influence 57
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent
Percent Turnover After First Year of Beginning
Teachers, According to Amount of Induction
Support They Received
No Induction 41
Some Induction
(4 Components) 27
Full Induction
(7Components) 18
0 10 20 30 40 50
Percent
Movers Leavers
Smith, T. & Ingersoll, R. 2004 "What are the Effects of Induction and Mentoring on Beginning Teacher Turnover?" American Educational Research Journal. 41: 3: 681-714.
http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty_research/Effects-of-Induction-and-Mentoring-RMI-Fall-2004.pdf
Percent Voluntary Turnover of Teachers, According
to Amount of Faculty Influence over School
Decisions and Policies
Percent
Note: “Voluntary Turnover” excludes retirements, layoffs, terminations and involuntary transfers
Source: Ingersoll, R. 2003. Who Controls Teachers’ Work? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/INGWHO.html
For Further Information, Copies of
Articles, Reports, etc.:
www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty/ingersoll.html