Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by:
Ghadeer Ali 68
Faisal Bhatti 79
M Talha 99
Arshian Akhtar 101
STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT IN CHINA
BY XIAOYA LIANG, JANET H. MARLER AND ZHIYU CUI
OUTLINES
i. Abstract / overview
ii. The Chinese context:
i. Social changes
ii. Political and legislation
iii. Business ownership
iii. Evidence Strategic HRM practices
iv. High performance work system in china (HPWS)
i. Employment security
ii. Employees participation
iii. Selective Hiring
iv. Extensive training
v. Internal mobility
vi. Performance appraisal
vii. High pay contingent on firm performance
vii. Discussion
viii. Future research
ix. Conclusion
ABSTRACT/OVERVIEW
The Outlines are important ideological, institutional, and cultural contexts that
shape what strategic human resource management practices are possible in
China. A detailed review of the main components of the high-performance
work systems model suggests that when they are introduced into the Chinese
socioeconomic and political context, the cost-benefit calculus for high-
performance work system human resource management practices is different
from that is the U.S content.
THE CHINESE CONTEXT
Social Changes
Individuals in China have come to associate their status and sense of self-worth with their role and standing in
the government bureaucratic system. Current Chinese economic reforms have also played a crucial role in
shaping the social values held by managers and employees.
Business Ownership
EVIDENCE STRATEGIC HRM PRACTICES
1. Business Strategy
2. Ownership
DISCUSSION
China rapidly changing economic
and political context provide a
unique opportunity to examine
the theoretical and empirical
foundations of SHRM knowledge.
A detailed review of the main components
of the HPWS model indicates that when
they are introduced into the Chinese
socioeconomic and political context
the cost-benefit calculus for each of
these practices appears different from
in the U.S. context.
FUTURE RESERACH
Our review of strategic HRM in China
suggests that there is enormous potential
for future research.
There is clearly a need to continue
to gather and analyze data on diffusion
of HPWS like HRM practices into Chinese
firms and to better understand which HRM
practices are being adopted by which types
of firms.
Our review suggests that U.S.-based HPWS
may not translate well in the Chinese context.
For example, it would be interesting to compare
taking a relational approach to HRM practices
in China—in the same vein as Haidilao—with a
U.S.-based measure of HPWS,
CONCLUSION