Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRI - Security and Diplomacy - 4
TRI - Security and Diplomacy - 4
SNSPA
Bucharest, 2018
IV. Power: Power Structure, Power
Politics, Power Cycles
1. How to explain or understand the role of power:
the realist perspective on IR and power
1.1.Realism (Political Realism): a school of thought that explains
International Relations (both conflictual & cooperative) in terms of
power
→ Neorealism: the role and consequences of the international power
structure
→ The necessity to “reinvent” political realism in order to understand the
present characteristics of world politics.
1.2.A long tradition:
→ Sun Tzu (the “warring states” period): advised the rulers of state how
to use power in order to advance their interests & protect their survival
→ Thucydides: the first systematic study of war ( the Peloponesian War,
431 - 404 B.C.)
→ Niccolo Machiavelli (about 1500): leadership and the logic of power
→ Thomas Hobbes (17th century): “the state of nature” or “the state of
→ Karl von Clausewitz (19th century): “war is a continuation of politics by
other means”
→ Edward Hallet Carr (20th century): the realist critique of “the natural
harmony of national interests” (“The Twenty-Years Crisis, 1919-1939: An
Introduction to the Study of International Relations”, 1939)
→ Hans Morgenthau (after the World War II): international politics is
governed by objective laws based on national interest defined as power.
Other authors: Kenneth Waltz, Raymond Aron, Martin Wight, Hedley Bull,
Henry Kissinger & Zbigniew Brzezinski
1.3.Please remember the realist assumptions on how International Relations
work:
a) the state-centric assumption: states are the most important actors and
the distribution of power in the international system is essential.
b) the unitary rational-actor assumption: rational pursuit of self-interest
c) the anarchy assumption: they act in a system of sovereign states,
lacking central government
2. POWER: the central concept in International
Relations; surprisingly difficult to define or measure
2.1.Defining power: the ability to influence the behavior of others: to get
another actor to do what it would not otherwise have done (or not to do what it
would have done) (Robert A. Dahl) or actors are powerful to the extent that
they affect others more than others affect them (Kenneth Waltz), or
→ Power is the capability to prevail in conflicts, or
→ Power is the capability to control events (influence probabilities)
2.2.All these dimensions should be treated together
2.3.These definitions treat power as influence. Power is not influence in itself, but
the capability or potential to influence others.
2.4.This potential is based on specific (tangible) characteristics or possessions of
states: size, territory and population, level of economic development (GDP);
industrial development; military expeditures and armed forces etc. This is
power as capability.
→ Capability = the differential possession of some characteristics or attributes or
resources. Capabilities are easier to measure. GDP is a useful estimator of
material capabilities.
→ The use of geography as an element of power = a component of geopolitics
→ Power also depends on intangible elements: national will, the quality of
the political & administrative institutions, diplomatic skill; popular
support, domestic mobilization, often through religion, ideology or
nationalism.
2.5.International influence is gained by promoting its own values, by being
the one to set agenda, to form rules of behavior, to change images (the
way others see the world or even their own national interests) = soft
power (Joseph S. Nye, Jr.)
2.6.As a conclusion: Power is a mix of many “ingredients”: population,
territory, geography, natural resources, economic development and
industrial capacity, administrative capacity, scientific & technical/logical
base, moral legitimacy, military force, political culture, education, popular
support of government etc.
→ Power resources = elements that an actor can draw on over the long term
to develop particular capabilities, plans and actions.
→ Power capabilities = allow actors to exercise influence in the short term
(e.g.. military forces; military-industrial capacity; the quality of state’s
bureaucracy etc.)
3. Power as a relation / interaction
5.1.In terms of time, the modern world system has existed for 500 years, first
emerging when certain European states developed a capacity for global action.
5.2.The global political system = institutions & arrangements for the management of
global problems & relations and a hegemonic structure
→ entities that dominate the system for a generation or more and whose
influence pervades an entire century = world powers
→ the history of world politics = a succession of world powers; each period
associated with a world power = one cycle
→ a series of long cycles of about one hundred years.
5.3.The global political system has displayed a recurring or cyclical pattern: since
1494: 5 full systemic cycles → the transition into the 6th
5.4.Transition: global war or hegemonic war = long lasting, averaging 25 years in
length; a war that changes the international system; a mechanism of “selection”; a
war fought over succession to world leadership, when a rising power is surpassing
the most powerful state → a new hegemonic structure (filling the essential
global needs - public goods - for global governance, order, security, stability,
innovation, trade) (Organski, Modelski, Gilpin, etc.)
NB: Since 1494 there have been 5 full systemic cycles and the global system is now in
a transition phase into the 6th. or the first of a new international system
LONG CYCLES (Systemic)
VI 1989/91 - USA II ?