seek defined objectives enthusiastically. It is the human factor which binds a group together and motivates it towards goals. The definition of leadership includes two key elements: the ability to motivate and the ability to focus efforts on goals accomplishment. LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
Good leadership is important since it
helps to develop teamwork and the integration of individual and group goals. leadership has a broader context and relates more to the quality of a person with in a job, rather than the job it self LEADERSHIP AND POWER leadership influence will be dependent on the type of power you can exercise over others. Mullins (1999) identifies three main sources of positional power related to leadership. Reward power based: leader can directly reward those who comply with directives (such as pay, promotion or praise). Legitimate power based: leader has the right to wield power which is based on authority and hierarchical position. Coercive power based: leader can punish or bring about undesirable outcomes for those who do not comply with directives (such as withholding pay, withdrawing support or even dismissal). PERSONAL POWER Effective leadership in organizations is often based more on personal power than on positional power. Mullins (1999) identifies two distinct forms of personal power.
Referent power based on the degree of identification
with a leader due to their personal charm or charisma. Charismatic leadership, based on esteem and respect.
Expert power based on the perception that the
leader is the expert in his or her field and provides credibility and knowledge. Expert power is often limited to well-defined medical specialists, or to expert managerial tasks. APPROACHES TO SUCCESSFUL LEADERSHIP what it is that makes a leader successful. It shows how the different styles of leadership you adopt can have a significant impact on the motivation of staff in meeting organization goals. THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
1. LEADERSHIP TRAITS
2. LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOURAL THEORY
LEADERSHIP TRAITS
Trait theories assume that leaders are born and not
made, and much research has been devoted to identifying the personality traits common to successful leaders. Intelligence – a leader being in some way superior to followers; Maturity – including a breath of wisdom and interests; Motivational - -a high degree of inner drive for achievement; People-centred – the ability to respect and work well with others. LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOURAL THEORY Leadership behavioral theories differ from trait theories since they suggest that it is not personality behaviours that determine whether or not a leader is successful. One of the best-known works in this field is the Ohio State Leadership Study that examined the nature of different leadership styles on group performance (Fleishman, 1974). Questionnaires were used across the range of different organizations and in a variety of situation, in which a list of descriptions relating to leadership behavior were used. Results indicated two major dimensions of leadership behavior LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOURAL THEORY
Consideration, in which the leader establishes trust and
respect through close sympathetic communication with individuals and teams; Structure, reflecting the way a leader defines how the groups should organize themselves to achieve goals. A key issue here is the extent to which these two behavioral types are combined. Employee-centered approaches (based on consideration) might be more effective in leadership than production-centered ones (based on structure). LEADERSHIP STYLE There are many ways to lead and every leader has his or her own style. Some of the more common styles include autocratic, bureaucratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. In the past several decades, management experts have undergone a revolution in how they define leadership and what their attitudes are toward it. They have gone from a very classical autocratic approach to a very creative, participative approach. Somewhere along the line, it was determined that not everything old was bad and not everything new was good. Rather, different styles were needed for different situations and each leader needed to know when to exhibit a particular approach. AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
This is often considered the classical approach.
It is one in which the manager retains as much power and decision-making authority as possible. The manager does not consult employees, nor are they allowed to give any input. Employees are expected to obey orders without receiving any explanations. The motivation environment is produced by creating a structured set of rewards and punishments. This leadership style has been greatly criticized. Some studies say that organizations with many autocratic leaders have higher turnover and absenteeism than other organizations. AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
Rely on threats and punishment to influence employees
Do not trust employees Do not allow for employee input
Autocratic leadership is not all bad. Sometimes it is the
most effective style to use. These situations can include: New, untrained employees who do not know which tasks to perform or which procedures to follow Effective supervision can be provided only through detailed orders and instructions Employees do not respond to any other leadership style There are high-volume production needs on a daily basis There is limited time in which to make a decision A manager’s power is challenged by an employee The area was poorly managed The autocratic leadership style should not be used when: Employees become tense, fearful. Employees expect to have their opinions heard Employees begin depending on their manager to make all their decisions There is low employee morale, high turnover and absenteeism and work stoppage BUREAUCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
Bureaucratic leadership is where the manager
manages “by the book¨ everything must be done according to procedure or policy.
If it isn’t covered by the book, the manager
refers to the next level above him or her.
This manager is really more of a police officer
than a leader. He or she enforces the rules. BUREAUCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
This style can be effective when:
Employees are performing routine tasks over and
over. Employees need to understand certain standards or procedures. Employees are working with dangerous or delicate equipment that requires a definite set of procedures to operate. Safety or security training is being conducted. Employees are performing tasks that require handling cash. This style is ineffective when:
Work habits form that is hard to break, especially if
they are no longer useful.
Employees lose their interest in their jobs and in
their fellow workers.
Employees do only what is expected of them and no
more. DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE The democratic leadership style is also called the participative style as it encourages employees to be a part of the decision making. The democratic manager keeps his or her employees informed about everything that affects their work and shares decision making and problem solving responsibilities. This style requires the leader to be a coach who has the final say, but gathers information from staff members before making a decision. Democratic leadership can produce high quality and high quantity work for long periods of time. Many employees like the trust they receive and respond with cooperation, team spirit, and high morale. DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE
The democratic leadership style is most effective when:
The leader wants to keep employees informed about
matters that affect them. The leader wants employees to share in decision-making and problem-solving duties. The leader wants to provide opportunities for employees to develop a high sense of personal growth and job satisfaction. There is a large or complex problem that requires lots of input to solve. Changes must be made or problems solved that affect employees or groups of employees. You want to encourage team building and participation. Democratic leadership should not be used when:
There is not enough time to get everyone’s input.
It’s easier and more cost-effective for the manager to make the decision. The business can’t afford mistakes. The manager feels threatened by this type of leadership. Employee safety is a critical concern. LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP STYLE
The laissez-faire leadership style is also
known as the “hands-off¨ style. It is one in which the manager provides little or no direction and gives employees as much freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the employees and they must determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own. LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP STYLE This is an effective style to use when: Employees are highly skilled, experienced, and educated. Employees have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own. Outside experts, such as staff specialists or consultants are being used Employees are trustworthy and experienced. This style should not be used when:
It makes employees feel insecure at the
unavailability of a manager. The manager cannot provide regular feedback to let employees know how well they are doing. Managers are unable to thank employees for their good work. The manager doesn’t understand his or her responsibilities and is hoping the employees can cover for him or her. DECIDING HOW TO LEAD
Three levels should be taken into account by the
administrator who is selecting the leadership style for a particular situation.
The first level forces in the manager:
His / Her own values confidence in subordinates
Own feeling of security
The second level forces in the subordinates:
A great need for independence
Readiness to assume responsibility for decision-making A relatively high tolerance for uncertainty An interest in the problem An understanding of the goals of the organization The necessary knowledge and experience. Third level forces in the organizations:
Expectations of the organization’s management
Ability of the subordinates to function as a group The problem itself Time constraints. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EFFECTIVE LEADER
An effective leader is a person who:
Mediates and tempers the organizational requirements to the needs of persons in a manner the is organizationally enhancing (the organization and the persons both profit from the relationship); Promotes group loyalty and personal ties (working for the facility becomes a personally satisfying experience); Demonstrates care for individuals;