Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Institute, Pune 6s
Key Steps: 1 15th June-10 2 22nd June-2010 3 29th June-2010 4 10th July-2010 5 30th Sept-2010
Step B: Develop Team Step 2: Define Step 5: Define Step 8: Discover Variable Step 11: Determine Process
Charter Performance Performance Relationships Capability
Standards Objectives
Step C: Define Process Step 3: Measurement Step 6: Identify Variation Step 9: Establish Step 12: Implement Process
Map System Analysis Sources) Operating Control
Tolerances
Key Deliverables
Required Required Required Required Required
• List of Project CTQs • Data Collection Plan • Baseline of Current Process • List of Vital Few Xs • MSA Results on Xs
• Team Charter • CTQ Worksheet: Performance • Transfer Function(s) • Post Improvement
• High Level Process Map Operational definition, • Graphical analysis of output • Optimal Settings for Xs Capability
(Y)
(COPIS) Specification limits, target, • Confirmation • Statistical Confirmation
defect definition for Project • Statistical Goal Statement
for Project Runs/Results of Improvements
Y(s)
Tools That May Help • List of Statistically • Tolerances on Vital Few • Process Control Plan
• Measurement System
• Project Risk Assessment Significant Xs Xs • Process Owner Signoff
Analysis
• Stakeholder Analysis
• High Level Project Plan Tools That May Help Tools That May Help Tools That May Help
Tools That May Help • Six Sigma Process &
• In Frame/Out of Frame • Design of Experiments • Control Charts
• QFD
• Customer Survey Product Reports • New Process Maps • Hypothesis Testing
• Gage R&R/Attribute R&R • Benchmarking
Methods (focus groups, • FMEA on new process • CAP Plan
• Detailed Process Map • Fishbone Diagram
interviews, etc.) • Process Modeling • Documentation/SOP
• FMEA • Hypothesis Testing
• Elevator Speech • Regression Analysis • Brainstorming
• Pareto Analysis
Identifying Project CTQs Define
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step A
S-Sat is a unique
measure.
CTQ Drilldown Tree Define
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step A
Business Case: Improved patients satisfaction will add to the revenue and effectiveness of
preventive and curative healthcares.
Reduced cost because of improving efficiaency.
Increased other stakeholder's satisfaction level to improve sustainability of the
business,
Problem Statement: Satisfaction level of overall stakeholders, termed as S-Sat, during the baseline of
April-09 to April-10 is: 3.937 and s.d. 0.05.
Goal Statement: To enhance S-SAT to >=4.09.
Benefit: Addressing overall sensitivity to all the stakeholders.
Scope: Patient
Doctors
Management
Employees
Parties
Process:
Process Starts with: Identify Stakeholders
Process Ends with: Retain satisfied stakeholders
Team:
Black-belt: Dr. Amit Bhartiya
Champion: Mr. Sudeep Macha
MBB Mr. Subrata Rath
Team Members: Mr. Girish Mahindrakar
Mr. Mohit Chaturvedi- Operations
Schedule:
Define 15th June-2010
Measure 22th June-2010
Analyse 29th June-2010
Improve 10th July-2010
Control 30th Sept-2010
Signature:
Staff clearly
I was able to All my
Admissions explained to I had to wait I got the
easily find queries were
Staff was me the room for less than room of my
my way to answered
ADMISSION polite, helpful charges, 30 minutes choice at the
the patiently by
and friendly estimates to get a room time of
Admission the staff at
with me and billing allocated Admission
Desk the desk
procedures
Data Collection Plan Measure
Indian Statistical Step 3
Institute, Pune
1 3.90 3.89 3.78 3.121412 4.095653 4.092697 4.00342253 4.078974 4.035971 4.123517 3.96516393 3.986547085 3.993373
1 3.91 3.91 3.77 3.117217 4.117952 4.13997 4.01206606 4.127708 4.046538 4.129122 3.97848245 3.933450088 4.001331
1 3.85 3.88 3.74 3.083574 4.053688 4.052681 3.96218267 4.074922 3.928571 4.055247 3.8960499 3.896604938 3.95036
2 3.98 3.88 3.83 3.193684 4.202224 4.208782 4.11121928 4.196411 4.076923 4.238642 4.06155399 4.02559415 4.111491
2 4.07 3.95 3.83 4.163429 4.173319 4.162203 4.07255987 4.13986 4.011723 4.125538 3.95144509 3.914132379 3.920063
2 4.09 3.97 3.82 4.21459 4.215816 4.193111 4.05532182 4.17176 3.985248 4.21449 4.02547771 3.88225256 3.93472
2 4.08 3.93 3.84 4.157649 4.184519 4.163998 4.07524558 4.189274 4.006316 4.165264 3.98640167 3.948220065 3.994092
2 3.96 3.85 3.78 4.055172 4.06946 4.052575 3.9777883 4.055611 3.92323 4.061228 3.92087043 3.775811209 3.762676
2 4.08 4.00 3.92 4.162225 4.169545 4.164994 4.08445192 4.142442 4.005786 4.153289 4.04624277 3.911544228 3.958229
2 4.02 3.95 3.88 4.106476 4.123512 4.112383 4.01324892 4.078189 3.965874 4.09719 3.96388029 3.833070866 3.792308
2 4.07 3.99 3.90 4.165479 4.164776 4.167526 4.06803429 4.13306 4.004103 4.141445 3.99386503 3.856 3.909209
2 4.07 3.98 3.95 4.131559 4.143969 4.125792 4.0708943 4.142716 4 4.167082 4.02882704 3.966412214 3.960381
2 4.06 3.99 3.92 4.131736 4.148116 4.130713 4.08189503 4.106031 4.000975 4.143979 4.03384913 3.924731183 3.921326
Establish Process
Capability Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 4
Institute, Pune
Seems to be
non-
representativ
ely low in the
baseline.
Establish Process
Capability- Overall Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 4
Institute, Pune
Ppk= -0.32
Sigma level= 0.54
Establish Process
Capability- Technical Analyze
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Baseline Step 4
Ppk= -0.31
Identify Variation Sources
FMEA Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 6
Institute, Pune
Code Processes and its Requirements Potential Failure Potential Severity Potential Causes of the failure Mode RPN
Mode of the Effect of the
processes Failure
Modes
P Manage total healthcare business
Address overall sensitivity to all the Not sensitive to Stakeholders 8 Stakeholders are not identified propoerly. 160
stakeholders. the stakeholders. dissatisfied
Residual
Proposed Actions Responsibilit Target date Actual Actions S O D RPN
y of Taken
Completion
95% Lower
Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean Bound T P
Improved S-Sat 4 4.1643 0.0644 0.0322 4.0885 2.31 0.052
Process Capability- After
Improvement Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8
Ppk= -0.32
Sigma level= 0.54
Before
Ppk= 0.38
Sigma level= 2.65
Before
Control Chart:
Before-After Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8
Establish Control Plan Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
CTQ--> Y Y1 Y2
C-SAT Admission Guest
relations
Total number of
patients(feed back
forms)
Total 16822
Average 989.5294118
Standard deviation 55.99120204
Process capabitity 335.9472122
LSL
UCL 1157.503018 0 0
LCL 821.5558056 0 0
Control Summary Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Control/Response Plan Highlights Benefits of Project
• I understand and take responsibility for monitoring the Defect Measurements as delineated
by the Project Team
• I will report the progress on this subprocess on a regular basis to the Quality Promotion Council
• I have reviewed this project’s isolated financial benefits with the Project Champion
• I understand the corrective action procedure and am responsible for ensuring that action
items are completed to hold the gains and capture the financial benefits
BB MBB
22-11-2010 22-11-2010