You are on page 1of 21

Indian Statistical

Institute, Pune 6s

Improving Stakeholder's Satisfaction Level in a Hospital from 3.94 to 4.09.

Black-belt: Dr. Amit Bhartiya


Champion: Mr. Sudeep Macha
MBB Mr. Subrata Rath
Team Members: Mr. Girish Mahindrakar
Mr. Mohit Chaturvedi- Operations
DMAIC
Industry/Function: xx
Project
Indian Statistical Enter date Progress
Institute, Pune Kick Off Date:
Sheet
Project Name: xx

Key Steps: 1 15th June-10 2 22nd June-2010 3 29th June-2010 4 10th July-2010 5 30th Sept-2010

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control


Step A: Identify Project Step 1: Select CTQ Step 4: Establish Process Step 7: Screen Potential Step 10: Define & Validate the
CTQs Characteristics Capability Causes Measurement System
on Xs

Step B: Develop Team Step 2: Define Step 5: Define Step 8: Discover Variable Step 11: Determine Process
Charter Performance Performance Relationships Capability
Standards Objectives

Step C: Define Process Step 3: Measurement Step 6: Identify Variation Step 9: Establish Step 12: Implement Process
Map System Analysis Sources) Operating Control
Tolerances

Overall Project Completion Percentage Enter %

Key Deliverables
Required Required Required Required Required
• List of Project CTQs • Data Collection Plan • Baseline of Current Process • List of Vital Few Xs • MSA Results on Xs
• Team Charter • CTQ Worksheet: Performance • Transfer Function(s) • Post Improvement
• High Level Process Map Operational definition, • Graphical analysis of output • Optimal Settings for Xs Capability
(Y)
(COPIS) Specification limits, target, • Confirmation • Statistical Confirmation
defect definition for Project • Statistical Goal Statement
for Project Runs/Results of Improvements
Y(s)
Tools That May Help • List of Statistically • Tolerances on Vital Few • Process Control Plan
• Measurement System
• Project Risk Assessment Significant Xs Xs • Process Owner Signoff
Analysis
• Stakeholder Analysis
• High Level Project Plan Tools That May Help Tools That May Help Tools That May Help
Tools That May Help • Six Sigma Process &
• In Frame/Out of Frame • Design of Experiments • Control Charts
• QFD
• Customer Survey Product Reports • New Process Maps • Hypothesis Testing
• Gage R&R/Attribute R&R • Benchmarking
Methods (focus groups, • FMEA on new process • CAP Plan
• Detailed Process Map • Fishbone Diagram
interviews, etc.) • Process Modeling • Documentation/SOP
• FMEA • Hypothesis Testing
• Elevator Speech • Regression Analysis • Brainstorming
• Pareto Analysis
Identifying Project CTQs Define
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step A

Customer Sample Comments Key Output Characteristics Key Questions


Important to Customer (CTQs)
What customer groups are the
Management We must be accepted by all S-Sat primary focus for this project?
the stakeholders. Patients

What methods were used to


understand customer
requirements?
Patient Treat well at lesser cost. Patient Satisfaction Rating Survey to each patient.

Which CTQ(s) will be the primary


focus for this project?
S-Sat

Employee I must get conductive Employee Satisfaction Rating


working environment

S-Sat is a unique
measure.
CTQ Drilldown Tree Define
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step A

CTQ--> Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12


C-SAT Admission Guest Doctors Nursing House Food & Pharmacy Mantaine General Laboratory Physiotherapy ICU
relations keeping Beverages nce feedback
Define
Indian Statistical Step B
Institute, Pune
Project Title Improving Stakeholder's Satisfaction Level in a Hospital from 3.94 to 4.09.

Business Case: Improved patients satisfaction will add to the revenue and effectiveness of
preventive and curative healthcares.
Reduced cost because of improving efficiaency.
Increased other stakeholder's satisfaction level to improve sustainability of the
business,
Problem Statement: Satisfaction level of overall stakeholders, termed as S-Sat, during the baseline of
April-09 to April-10 is: 3.937 and s.d. 0.05.
Goal Statement: To enhance S-SAT to >=4.09.
Benefit: Addressing overall sensitivity to all the stakeholders.
Scope: Patient
Doctors
Management
Employees
Parties
Process:
Process Starts with: Identify Stakeholders
Process Ends with: Retain satisfied stakeholders
Team:
Black-belt: Dr. Amit Bhartiya
Champion: Mr. Sudeep Macha
MBB Mr. Subrata Rath
Team Members: Mr. Girish Mahindrakar
Mr. Mohit Chaturvedi- Operations
Schedule:
Define 15th June-2010
Measure 22th June-2010
Analyse 29th June-2010
Improve 10th July-2010
Control 30th Sept-2010
Signature:

Name: BB Champion MBB


Designtaion
Date:
High Level Process Map Define
Indian Statistical Step C
Institute, Pune

Supplier Input Code Processes Output Customer

Patients Requirements P Manage total healthcare business

Doctor Knowledge P1 Identify stakeholders other than


patients
Resources P2 Understand their generic requirements

Hospital Resources P3 Devise a mehanism to assess their


manageme specific requirements
nt
P4 Rate the satisfaction by each individual
belonging to the different stakeholders

P5 Devise the measures of satisfaction


level for overall and each stakeholders

P6 Measure and identify the gaps


P7 Improve, Control and automate Feedback Treated
Patients
Detailed Process Analysis Measure
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune Step 1

 11 stakeholders identified to have various input/ concerns/ impact over


the healthcare and hospital management processes.
 Their issues are identified, feedback collected, measured,
benchmarked, analysed, acted upon for improvements, controlled.
 Sample issues are as under:

Staff clearly
I was able to All my
Admissions explained to I had to wait I got the
easily find queries were
Staff was me the room for less than room of my
my way to answered
ADMISSION polite, helpful charges, 30 minutes choice at the
the patiently by
and friendly estimates to get a room time of
Admission the staff at
with me and billing allocated Admission
Desk the desk
procedures
Data Collection Plan Measure
Indian Statistical Step 3
Institute, Pune

CTQ--> Y Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12


C-SAT Admission Guest Doctors Nursing House Food & Pharmacy Mantaine General Laboratory Physiotherapy ICU
relations keeping Beverages nce feedback

QC- UoM Rating Score


Support
System
Target > 4.09

1 3.90 3.89 3.78 3.121412 4.095653 4.092697 4.00342253 4.078974 4.035971 4.123517 3.96516393 3.986547085 3.993373
1 3.91 3.91 3.77 3.117217 4.117952 4.13997 4.01206606 4.127708 4.046538 4.129122 3.97848245 3.933450088 4.001331
1 3.85 3.88 3.74 3.083574 4.053688 4.052681 3.96218267 4.074922 3.928571 4.055247 3.8960499 3.896604938 3.95036
2 3.98 3.88 3.83 3.193684 4.202224 4.208782 4.11121928 4.196411 4.076923 4.238642 4.06155399 4.02559415 4.111491
2 4.07 3.95 3.83 4.163429 4.173319 4.162203 4.07255987 4.13986 4.011723 4.125538 3.95144509 3.914132379 3.920063
2 4.09 3.97 3.82 4.21459 4.215816 4.193111 4.05532182 4.17176 3.985248 4.21449 4.02547771 3.88225256 3.93472
2 4.08 3.93 3.84 4.157649 4.184519 4.163998 4.07524558 4.189274 4.006316 4.165264 3.98640167 3.948220065 3.994092
2 3.96 3.85 3.78 4.055172 4.06946 4.052575 3.9777883 4.055611 3.92323 4.061228 3.92087043 3.775811209 3.762676
2 4.08 4.00 3.92 4.162225 4.169545 4.164994 4.08445192 4.142442 4.005786 4.153289 4.04624277 3.911544228 3.958229
2 4.02 3.95 3.88 4.106476 4.123512 4.112383 4.01324892 4.078189 3.965874 4.09719 3.96388029 3.833070866 3.792308
2 4.07 3.99 3.90 4.165479 4.164776 4.167526 4.06803429 4.13306 4.004103 4.141445 3.99386503 3.856 3.909209
2 4.07 3.98 3.95 4.131559 4.143969 4.125792 4.0708943 4.142716 4 4.167082 4.02882704 3.966412214 3.960381
2 4.06 3.99 3.92 4.131736 4.148116 4.130713 4.08189503 4.106031 4.000975 4.143979 4.03384913 3.924731183 3.921326
Establish Process
Capability Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 4
Institute, Pune

Seems to be
non-
representativ
ely low in the
baseline.
Establish Process
Capability- Overall Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 4
Institute, Pune

Ppk= -0.32
Sigma level= 0.54
Establish Process
Capability- Technical Analyze
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Baseline Step 4

Process is not stable.

Ppk= -0.31
Identify Variation Sources
FMEA Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 6
Institute, Pune

Code Processes and its Requirements Potential Failure Potential Severity Potential Causes of the failure Mode RPN
Mode of the Effect of the
processes Failure
Modes
P Manage total healthcare business
Address overall sensitivity to all the Not sensitive to Stakeholders 8 Stakeholders are not identified propoerly. 160
stakeholders. the stakeholders. dissatisfied

Revenue loss Stakeholders' requirements are not identified 240


propoerly.

Margin loss Awareness of customer requirements to the 192


hospital staff, doctors & management is poor.

Business not Actions are not focused to the customer 128


sustainable. satisfactions.

P1 Identify stakeholders other than Lack of training and development 336


patients

P2 Understand their generic requirements Awareness to patients of consequences of 160


lack o compliance medical advice.

P3 Devise a mehanism to assess their Consultants' approach/ attitude towards 168


specific requirements patient is not propoer.
P4 Rate the satisfaction by each individual
belonging to the different stakeholders

P5 Devise the measures of satisfaction


level for overall and each stakeholders

P6 Measure and identify the gaps


P7 Improve, Control and automate
Identify Variation Sources
High Risk Causes Analyze
Indian Statistical Step 6
Institute, Pune
Action Plan
FMEA Follow up Improve
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 7

Residual
Proposed Actions Responsibilit Target date Actual Actions S O D RPN
y of Taken
Completion

Survey format was BB May-10 Routinely 8 3 3 72


designed. onwards. done.

Patients First GM- Apr-10 Weekly once 8 4 3 96


Campaign. Operations onwards. covering 20-30
staff covered.

Patients First GM- Apr-10 Weekly once 8 4 3 96


Campaign. Operations onwards. covering 20-30
staff covered.
Confirmation of
Improvement Improve
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8

Mood Median Test: S-Sat versus Stage

Mood median test for S-Sat


Chi-Square = 7.37 DF = 2 P = 0.025 : Significantly improved!!!!

Individual 95.0% CIs


Stage N<= N> Median Q3-Q1 ---------+---------+---------+-------
1 3 0 3.895 0.058 (---*)
2 6 4 4.067 0.074 (----*)
3 0 4 4.163 0.122 (-----*-----)
---------+---------+---------+-------
3.96 4.08 4.20

Overall median = 4.068


* NOTE * Levels with < 6 observations have confidence < 95.0%
Confirmation of
Improvement Improve
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8

One-Sample T: Improved S-Sat

Test of mu = 4.09 vs > 4.09

95% Lower
Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean Bound T P
Improved S-Sat 4 4.1643 0.0644 0.0322 4.0885 2.31 0.052
Process Capability- After
Improvement Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8

Ppk= -0.32
Sigma level= 0.54
Before

Ppk= 0.38
Sigma level= 2.65
Before
Control Chart:
Before-After Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Step 8
Establish Control Plan Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune

CTQ--> Y Y1 Y2
C-SAT Admission Guest
relations

QC- UoM Rating Score


Support
System
Target > 4.09

Min. freq. Each patient/ and


of all stakeholders
measure
ment
Record HMIS- Excel file
Ref.
Current HMIS- Excel file
Controls
Measure Measure Questionnaire
ment ment
Support device
System
L.C. 0.01
Calibratio Not required as
n of Rater of date

Kappa Not required as


Value of date

Weightage 0.044 0.058

Total number of
patients(feed back
forms)

Total 16822
Average 989.5294118
Standard deviation 55.99120204
Process capabitity 335.9472122
LSL
UCL 1157.503018 0 0
LCL 821.5558056 0 0
Control Summary Control
Indian Statistical
Institute, Pune
Control/Response Plan Highlights Benefits of Project

Control Plan established. Customer and Stakeholders’ satisfaction levels


significantly improved.

Sigma Levels/Improvement Communication & Translation


Explain what is being done to:
Project Y:
Baseline Improved • Documented the project
___________
• Provided any necessary training
Mean (continuous) or
4.01 4.16
• Translated project within/ outside of
Defects (discrete)
business
Std Dev. (continuous) or
0.08 0.06
• Communicated project results to the
DPMO (discrete)
management trusty.
Z-ST: 0.54 2.65

Z-LT: -0.96 1.15


Project Sign-Off
Indian Statistical
Control
Institute, Pune

Improving Stakeholder's Satisfaction Level in a Hospital from 3.94 to 4.09

CONTROL HAND-OFF SHEET

Core Process: Overall healthcare and hospital management Owner: GM-Operations

Subprocess: Same GM- Operations


Owner:
• Policies & Procedures were documented and communicated on 22-11-2010

• I understand the New Policies and Procedures

• I understand and take responsibility for monitoring the Defect Measurements as delineated
by the Project Team

• I will report the progress on this subprocess on a regular basis to the Quality Promotion Council

• I have reviewed this project’s isolated financial benefits with the Project Champion

• I understand the corrective action procedure and am responsible for ensuring that action
items are completed to hold the gains and capture the financial benefits

BB MBB
22-11-2010 22-11-2010

You might also like