Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The History of Bank
The History of Bank
On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers, at that time the fourth largest
investment bank in the US, filed for bankruptcy after admitting that it had made
losses of USD 3.9 billion. It was the largest bankruptcy filing ever recorded in the
United States and it triggered a drop of over 500 points in the Dow Jones Index.
The collapse was blamed on Lehman’s over-exposure to the sub-prime
mortgage crisis. Lehman Brothers had moved aggressively into the mortgage
market in 1997 when it bought Aurora Loan Services, and then consolidated its
position three years later by purchasing BNC Mortgage LLC. By 2006 these two
companies were lending a total of around USD 50 billion a month. Some people
described Lehman Brothers as a “real estate hedge fund disguised as an
investment bank.” In 2008, the company had assets of around USD 680 billion
against a capital of only USD 22.5 billion. As real estate values fell, the bank
allegedly made huge losses in low rate mortgage-backed securities. Failed
attempts by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and senior management of
leading Wall Street banks to find a solution left Lehman Brothers no choice but to
file for bankruptcy. The incident triggered deep repercussions in the financial
services sector and the scandal fueled the 2008 global financial crisis.
Express a clear rationale for key decisions
Treasury’s legislative proposal to extend the FDIC broad resolution
powers over any insolvent financial institution that poses a serious
threat to the entire financial system.
UK Payment Protection Insurance
Scandal (2006 - ongoing)
Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) in the UK was created to help those
who were unable to work due to illness or redundancy. In the 1990s,
banks and mortgage lenders began to aggressively sell such policies as
part of a mortgage or loan package, often without the knowledge of
the client. An investigation carried out by the Citizens Advice Bureau
revealed that PPI was adding a minimum of 20 percent to the cost of a
loan, and that the insurance was often mis-sold to people who did not
need it or who would never be able to claim. In 2006, the UK Financial
Services Authority, later known as the UK Financial Conduct Authority,
began to fine banks on charges of mis-selling PPI, and thousands of
consumers began claiming refunds and compensation from the banks
and brokers. The UK Financial Services Authority reported that more
than 45 million PPI policies had been sold and it was estimated that
banks and financial services companies would have to pay more than
GBP 40 billion (USD 47.3 billion) to handle the cost of claims. In March
2017, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority imposed a deadline of
August 29, 2019 for customers to claim refunds for mis-sold PPI policies.
Lessons learned from PPI can be seen in most of the policy
developments of the FCA.
The problem with PPI was not the product but how it was sold.
The ombudsman's work on PPI has shown how effective consumer
dispute resolution can be.
Madoff Ponzi Scheme (2008)
Basel I.5
Revised Risk-Based Capital Adequacy Framework For
Circular No. 688 05.26.2010 Stand-Alone Thrift Banks, Rural Banks and
Cooperative Banks
Basel II
Revised Risk-Based Capital Adequacy Framework For
Circular No. 538 08.04.2006 Universal and Commercial Banks and their Subsidiary Banks
and Quasi-banks
The central bank's order to close 14 rural banks in 2015 leads to the
continuing decline of established banks in the country.
The number of banks of operating in the Philippines continued to
decline in 2015 with the exit of weak players, particularly rural banks.
The latest data of the Bangko Central ng Pilipinas (BSP) released on
Monday, March 28, showed the number of big and small banks
operating in the country reached 632 in 2015, less than 2014's 648.
This indicates the continued consolidation of banks as well as the
exit of weaker players in the banking system," the BSP said.
President Benigno Aquino III signed Republic Act No. 10641 in July
last year, amending the foreign banks law by removing the limit of
foreign banks in the country earlier set at only 10.
Foreign banks under the new law have also been allowed to own as
much as 100% of any local bank, removing the previous cap of 60%.
So far, the BSP has also allowed 6 more foreign banks to set up shop
in the Philippines.
These include Sumitomo Mitsui of Japan, Cathay United Bank of
Taiwan, the Industrial Bank of Korea, Seoul-based Shinhan Bank,
Yuanta Bank of Taiwan, and United Overseas Bank Limited (UOB) of
Singapore.