Result or the Consequence of an Act is the real measure of whether it is good or bad. This theory emphasizes Ends over Means. emphasize the results or consequences are called teleological or consequentialist. Utilitarians believe that the purpose of morality is to make life better by increasing the amount of good things (such as pleasure and happiness) in the world and decreasing the amount of *Bentham’s Formulation of Utilitarianism Man is under two great
masters, pain and pleasure.
The great good that we
should seek is happiness.
(a hedonistic perspective) Those actions whose
results increase happiness
or diminish pain are good. They have “utility.” *Jeremy Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus In determining the quantity of happiness that might be produced by an action, we evaluate the possible consequences by applying several values: Intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, FOUR THESES OF UTILITARIANISM Consequentialism: The rightness of actions is determined solely by their consequences. Hedonism: Utility is the degree to which an act produces pleasure. Hedonism is the thesis that pleasure or happiness is the good that we seek and that we should seek. Maximalism: A right action produces the greatest good consequences and the least bad. Universalism: The consequences to be considered are those of everyone affected, and everyone equally. TWO FORMULATIONS OF UTILITARIAN THEORY
1. Principle of Utility: The best action
is that which produces the greatest happiness and/or reduces pain. 2. Greatest Happiness: We ought to do that which produces the greatest happiness and least pain for the greatest number of people. TWO TYPES OF UTILITARIANISM 1. Act: An Action is right if and only if it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the greatest number. (Jeremy Bentham) 2. Rule: An action is right if and only if it conforms to a set of rules the general acceptance of which would produce the greatest balance of pleasure over pain for the greatest number. (John Stuart Mill) APPLICATION OF UTILITARIAN THEORY If you can use eighty soldiers as a decoy in war, and thereby attack an enemy force and kill several hundred enemy soldiers, that is a morally good choice even though the eighty might be lost. If lying or stealing will actually bring about more happiness and/or reduce pain, Act Utilitarianism says we should lie and steal in those cases. *CRITICISMS OF UTILITARIANISM
Utilitarianism plays fast and loose
with God’s commandments. If lying, stealing, or killing could lead to an increase of happiness for the greatest number, we are told we should lie, steal or kill. Isn’t that a rejection of God’s commands?
(Christian Faith Perspectives in Leadership and Business) Stuart W. Boyer - Biblical Leadership Development-Springer International Publishing, Palgrave Macmillan (2019)