Historical research comes from deep traditions and differs from
the other methodologies in the way the methodology section is written. In most historical research, the methodology is integrated into the body of the report. Sometimes it is included in the introduction and at other times, the various elements of methodology are integrated throughout. The historian would be concerned with how we treated disabled children in the past, perhaps looking for differences across jurisdictions or for children with differing sorts of handicaps. Descriptive Methods
Just as data are fundamental to research, description is an
essential extension of data. There are many types of data and many ways to describe, but we need accurate and understandable description in order to communicate what we observe. Experimental and Quasi- experimental Methods These are comparative methods in which different groups of people or organizations receive different opportunities and the researcher attempts to demonstrate the differences among the groups on some type of quantitative measure such as student examination results. These methods have dominated educational research for much of the century, though they are now being supplanted by more eclectic methods. In the example, there could be a range of comparative questions asked. Correlational Methods
Correlational methods attempt to explore relationships between variables
Note that you need quantitative data in order to conduct correlational research. Correlational research relies on pairs of observations, each related to an individual or other unit of analysis. Be sure you understand the fact that correlation does not mean that one variable causes another. It only means that there is a relationship. The cause may be something else entirely. Although one variable does not necessarily cause the other, knowledge of a first may allow prediction of a second. That opens up a whole field of prediction studies and the use of mathematical models and equations to predictfuture states. The example related to disabled children defines a typical question that attempts to predict success factors. Qualitative Methods
Ethnography, phenomenology, case study, biographical,
grounded theory and applied/action research are among the wide range of qualitative approaches used to study phenomena. The intent is to uncover the implicit meaning in a particular situation from one or more perspectives. The data may include dynamic interaction such as one observes or analyzes through discourse, semiotics, narrative and content analysis. In studying disabled children, one focus that may interest the qualitative researcher is the meaning various stakeholders attach to integrating disabled children into the classroom. Program Evaluation Methods
Evaluation research combines both qualitative and quantitative
methods to address questions about programs generally related to an overall framework. In the disabled child example, the evaluator would examine the program and evaluate its rationale, efficiency, effectiveness, effects and impacts. Case Study Methods
The case study examines some significant incident or series of
events to clarify what happens in such situations. These methods are also eclectic, though like program evaluation, they follow models and frameworks that have become somewhat standard. The case study considers what happened to a single child. Another approach might study educational change exemplified by the introduction of the new program. Policy Research
Policy research is a field concerned with research about various
aspects of policy. In some cases the focus is retrospective and examines the results of policy (sometimes referred to as ‘policy in implementation’), while in others, the researcher is concerned with the prospective aspect (the ‘what if’ question). Organizational Evaluation
Organizational evaluation is concerned with research that helps
to clarify certain dimensions of organizations such as their capacity and their performance. The whole organization is the unit of analysis in such research which can effectively produce an evaluative case study of the organization. My colleagues and I have developed a framework for assessing the motivation, capacity and performance of organizations and we have conducted extensive work on self-assessment processes.