Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(C K Prahalad and Gary Hamel in the preface to Competing for the future)
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
• Religious factors
• Language
Cultural Universals
Irrespective of the religion, race, region, caste, etc., all of us have more or
less the same needs. These common needs are referred to as ‘Cultural
Universals’ and identified as – cooking, dancing, singing, education,
athletic, sports, bodily adornment, joking, kin groups, status differentiation
and dream interpretation.
The cultural universals enable businessmen to market the products in many
foreign countries with modifications. For example, TVs, cars, video games.
Culture is not a barrier to computer software.
As such, computer software industry of the USA, Europe and Australia has
been attracting most of the Indian computer software engineers. Other
examples include diamonds, gold ornaments, flowers which have worldwide
demand.
Many managers felt that Japanese would not eat ‘black food’, when
Yamazaki-Nabisco thought of introducing Oreo cookies in Japan. But Oreo
cookies became number one cookies in Japan.
Cultural Universals do not mean that two cultures are not very much close
to each other.
Safe rules in International Communication.
“Speak to the rest of the world as
if you were answering a slightly deaf,
very sick old auntie,
who just asked you how much to
leave for you in her will.”
A prolonged eye-to-eye contact is polite in the
USA and rude in Japan, Indian and Sino
cultures.
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
Demographic environment
• Age composition
• Economic Diversity
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
2. Technological environment
3. Economic environment
• Nature and level of development of economy
• Economic resources
• Size of economy
• Political parties
• Radical differences
• Fundamentalists
• Govt. system
• Liberal or Conservative policies
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
• Trade barriers
Tariffs
• Natural Resources
• Absolute advantages
3.Organisational Culture
Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory
Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-
cultural communication, developed by Geert Hofstede. It
describes the effects of a society's culture on the values of its
members, and how these values relate to behaviour, using a
structure derived from factor analysis.
Hofstede developed his original model as a result of using factor
analysis to examine the results of a world-wide survey of
employee values by IBM between 1967 and 1973. It has been
refined since.
The original theory proposed four dimensions along which
cultural values could be analyzed:
1.Individualism-collectivism;
2.Uncertainty avoidance;
3.Power distance (strength of social hierarchy)
4.Masculinity-femininity (task orientation versus person-
orientation).
Independent research in Hong Kong led Hofstede to add a fifth
dimension, long-term orientation, to cover aspects of values not
discussed in the original paradigm. In 2010, Hofstede added a
sixth dimension, indulgence versus self-restraint.
• ADAPTABILITY (Entrepreneurial)
• Involves 3 steps
KURT LEWIN : FIELD FORCE THEORY
• A] unfreezing : creates motivation for change, if people
feel uncomfortable with the present situation, they may
see the need for change
•
• B] change : assimilation of new information, exposure to
new concepts, development of a different perspective
•
• C] freezing : stabilises the change. Change to be effective
has to be congruent with a person’s self concept and
values.
•
Thank You
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
Capitalism, Socialism and Communism Compared
Characteristics Capitalism Socialism Communism
Business Ownership Individuals have a State owns the basic State owns all
right to own a industries. Other productive capacity.
business and to businesses may
contract with others. exist.
International Business : Prof Bharat Nadkarni
Capitalism, Socialism and Communism Compared
Characteristics Capitalism Socialism Communism
Risk Assumption Losses assumed by People assume risks Economic
owners. May of state-owned production owned
transfer business industries. Losses by the state. Risks
risks to other taken from taxes. assumed by the
businesses through state. Losses reduce
insurance. standard of living.
Thank you