You are on page 1of 37

CHAPTER 7 (Modified)

Optimal Risky Portfolios

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
7-2

Learning Objectives
• The investment decision
• Diversification and portfolio risk
• Portfolios of two risky assets
• Asset allocation with stocks, bonds
and bills (risk-free asset)
• The Markowitz portfolio selection
model

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-3

The Investment Decision


Top-down process with 3 steps:
1. Capital allocation between the risky portfolio
and risk-free assets
2. Asset allocation across broad asset classes
3. Security selection of individual assets within
each asset class

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-4

Diversification and Portfolio Risk

• Diversification
“don’t put all your eggs in one basket”

• Harry Markowitz (1952) published a


formal model of portfolio selection
embodying diversification principles,
thereby paving the way for his 1990
Nobel Prize in Economics. Markowitz’s
work became the foundation of ‘Modern
Portfolio Theory’
INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,
JAIN
7-5

Diversification and Portfolio Risk


• Market risk
– Systematic or nondiversifiable
– Macroeconomic factors such as business cycle,
inflation, interest rates, and exchange rates…etc.

• Firm-specific risk
– Diversifiable or nonsystematic
– For example, selling ice-cream vs selling
raincoats
– Diversify into two businesses can eliminate risk

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-6

Figure 7.1 Portfolio Risk as a Function of the


Number of Stocks in the Portfolio

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-7

Figure 7.2 Portfolio Diversification

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-8

Covariance and Correlation


• Portfolio risk depends on the
correlation between the returns of the
assets in the portfolio

• Covariance and the correlation


coefficient provide a measure of the
way returns of two assets vary

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-9

Two-Security Portfolio: Return

rp  wr
D D
 wE r E
rP  Portfolio Return
wD  Bond Weight
rD  Bond Return
wE  Equity Weight
rE  Equity Return

E ( r p )  w D E ( rD )  w E E ( rE )

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-10

Two-Security Portfolio: Risk

  w   w   2wD wE Cov rD , rE 
2
p
2
D
2
D
2
E
2
E

 = Variance of Security D
2
D

 = Variance of Security E
2
E

Cov rD , rE= Covariance of returns for


Security D and Security E

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-11

Two-Security Portfolio: Risk

• Another way to express variance of the


portfolio:

  w D w D C ov ( rD , rD )  w E w E C ov ( rE , rE )  2 w D w E C ov ( rD , rE )
2
P

• Covariance of a security with itself is just


the variance of the security

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-12

Covariance & Correlation Coefficient


Cov(rD,rE) = DEDE

D,E = Correlation coefficient of


returns
D = Standard deviation of
returns for Security D

E = Standard deviation of
returns for Security E
INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,
JAIN
7-13

Correlation Coefficients: Possible Values


Range of values for D, E
+ 1.0 > r > -1.0

If r = +1.0, the securities D & E are perfectly


positively correlated
If r = 0, the securities D & E are uncorrelated
If r = -1.0, the securities D & E are perfectly
negatively correlated
INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,
JAIN
7-14

Correlation Coefficients
• When ρDE = 1, there is no diversification

 P  wE E  wD D

• When ρDE = -1, a perfect hedge is possible


D
wE   1  wD
D  E

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-15

Table 7.2 Computation of Portfolio


Variance From the Covariance Matrix

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-16

Three-Asset Portfolio

E ( r p )  w1 E ( r1 )  w 2 E ( r2 )  w 3 E ( r3 )

 p2  w12 12  w22 22  w32 32


 2 w1w2 1, 2  2w1w3 1,3  2w2 w3 2,3

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-17

Mathematics of Modern Portfolio


Theory

Please refer to the


supplementary handout
for the general
mathematics of MPT

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-18

Descriptive Statistics for Two Mutual


Funds

Debt Fund Equity Fund


Expected Return, E(r) 8% 13%
Standard Deviation,  12% 20%
Covariance, COV(rD, rE) 0.0072
Correlation coefficient, ρDE 0.30

The data are used for the examples in the


figures in the following slides.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-19

Figure 7.3 Portfolio Expected Return as a


Function of Investment Proportions

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-20

Figure 7.4 Portfolio Standard Deviation as a


Function of Investment Proportions

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-21

The Minimum Variance Portfolio


• The minimum variance • When correlation is
portfolio is the portfolio less than +1, the
composed of the risky portfolio standard
assets that has the deviation may be
smaller than that of
smallest standard either of the individual
deviation, the portfolio component assets.
with least risk.
• When correlation is
-1, the standard
deviation of the
minimum variance
portfolio is zero.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-22

Figure 7.5 Portfolio Expected Return as a


Function of Standard Deviation

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-23

Correlation Effects
• The amount of possible risk reduction
through diversification depends on the
correlation.
• The risk reduction potential increases as
the correlation approaches -1.
– If r = +1.0, no risk reduction is possible.

– If r = 0, σP may be less than the standard


deviation of either component asset.
– If r = -1.0, a riskless hedge is possible.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-24

Figure 7.6 The Opportunity Set of the Debt and Equity Funds
and Two Feasible CALs

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-25

The Sharpe Ratio


• Maximize the slope of the CAL for any
possible portfolio, P.
• The objective function is the slope:

E ( rP )  r f
SP 
P
• The slope is also the Sharpe ratio.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-26

Figure 7.7 The Opportunity Set of the Debt and Equity Funds
with the Optimal CAL and the Optimal Risky Portfolio

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-27

Figure 7.8 Determination of the Optimal


Overall Portfolio

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-28

Figure 7.9 The Proportions of the Optimal


Overall Portfolio

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-29

Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model


• Security Selection
– The first step is to determine the risk-
return opportunities available.
– All portfolios that lie on the minimum-
variance frontier from the global
minimum-variance portfolio and upward
provide the best risk-return
combinations

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-30

Figure 7.10 The Minimum-Variance


Frontier of Risky Assets

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-31

Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model

• We now search for the CAL with the


highest reward-to-variability ratio (given
the risk-free rate of return, rf )

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-32

Figure 7.11 The Efficient Frontier of Risky


Assets with the Optimal CAL

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-33

Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model


• Everyone invests in P, regardless of their
degree of risk aversion.

– More risk averse investors put more in the


risk-free asset.

– Less risk averse investors put more in P.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-34

Capital Allocation and the


Separation Property
• The separation property tells us that the
portfolio choice problem may be
separated into two independent tasks
– Determination of the optimal risky
portfolio is purely technical.
– Allocation of the complete portfolio to T-
bills versus the risky portfolio depends
on personal preference.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-35

Figure 7.13 Capital Allocation Lines with


Various Portfolios from the Efficient Set

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-36

Optimal Portfolios and Nonnormal


Returns
• Fat-tailed distributions can result in extreme
values of VaR and ES and encourage smaller
allocations to the risky portfolio.

• If other portfolios provide sufficiently better VaR


and ES values than the mean-variance efficient
portfolio, we may prefer these when faced with
fat-tailed distributions.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN
7-37

Risk Pooling and the Insurance Principle

Skip Section 7.5 in the textbook on the


discussion of Risk Pooling and the
Insurance Principle.

They will NOT be asked in


examination.

INVESTMENTS (ASIA GLOBAL EDITION) | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS,


JAIN

You might also like