Digital Differential Relays For Transformer Protection Using Walsh Series and Least Squares Estimators

You might also like

You are on page 1of 33

DIGITAL DIFFERENTIAL RELAYS

FOR TRANSFORMER PROTECTION


USING WALSH SERIES AND LEAST
SQUARES ESTIMATORS

Ali Reza FEREIDUNIAN*,


Mansooreh ZANGIABADI*,
Majid SANAYE-PASAND*,
Gholam POURNAGHI**
* : ECE Dep., Faculty of Engg., University of
Tehran,Tehran, IRAN
*:* Kerman Regional Electric Company (KREC),
Kerman, IRAN
Differential Protection
 The fundamental principle of
differential protection: sum of the
currents entering a device through
normal paths should be zero:
Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL).
 If the currents enter (or leave) through
abnormal paths, namely fault paths,
then the sum of the currents through
normal paths will not be zero.
Differential Protection Illustration

6
 i j  0 ?!
j1
Problems in transformer
differential protection:
 inrush current,
 CT inaccuracy,
 CT saturation,
 over-excitation.

These problems produce fault trips (fault alarm


when there isn’t any trip) or no alarm when
there is a trip in transformer protection
function
DIFFERENTIAL RELAY
IMPLEMENTATION:

 Current Sensor (CT): converts large


amounts of current to small amounts
 Data Acquisition System: gathering data
 Filter: anti aliasing
 Pre-processor: scaling and so on
 Estimator: estimating peak & phase
 Decision Maker (Classifier): fault/no fault
Effect of CT Saturation on a
Sinusoidal Current:
Magnetizing Curve
5
Flux [V.S]

Current [A]
-5
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1
Primary

-1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2
Secondary

-2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Time
WE HAVE USED TWO METHODS:

 FOR ESTIMATING PEAK AND


PHASE OF INPUT WAVE.
Walsh coefficients :
t1  T
1 t
Wk   f ( t ) * Wal (K, )dt
T t1 T

1 2n
Ŵn  n  f (KT)  Wal (KT)
2 k 1
Walsh Series (Ctd):
 W=A * F
 F=A-1*W
where
 F=[ F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8]
 A-1=AT

I1peak  F  F
1
2
2
2

I 2 peak  F32  F42



Least Squares :
 A*X = B
 E = A*X – B
2
E / X  0

 X est = LPI(A) * B
T 1 T
 LPI(A) = ( A * A ) * A
Sampling:
 12 point window (for half cycle estimation)
or
 24 points (for full cycle estimation)
with
 24 sample/cycle sampling system
Least square frequncy response for
fundamental frequency
1.5
cosine filter

1 Essential Harmonic Frequency response

0.5

0
0 500 1000 1500

1.5

1
sine filter

0.5

0
0 500 1000 1500
frequency [HZ]
The Decision Space
Differential Relay Characteristics Curve
45

40

35
Fault Zone
30

25
|Idif|

20

15
Non-Fault Zone
10

0
0 50 100 150
|Ires|
Inrush Pattern Recognition

 A significant second harmonic:


Inrush Current Pattern Recognition
A CASE STUDY
 Real recorded data:

 Transformer internal fault,


 Transformer external fault,
 Transformer inrush current
High and Low Voltage Side
Currents for External Fault
External Fault Currents, High and Low voltage Sides
200
Iha
100 Ihc
Iha, Ihb, Ihc

-100
Ihb
-200
0 50 100 150

200
Ilb
100
Ila, Ilb, Ilc

0
Ilc
-100
Ila
-200
0 50 100 150
Sample (Time)
High and Low Voltage Side
Currents for Internal Fault
Internal Fault Currents, High and Low voltage Sides
200
Iha
100
Iha, Ihb, Ihc

0
Ihb
-100
Ihc
-200
0 50 100 150

50
Ila
Ila, Ilb, Ilc

Ilc
Ilb
-50
0 50 100 150
Sample (Time)
High and Low Voltage Side
Currents for Inrush Current
Inrush Currents, High and Low voltage Sides
100
Iha
50
Iha, Ihb, Ihc

-50 Ihb
Ihc
-100
0 50 100 150 200 250

0.02
Ilb
0
Ila, Ilb, Ilc

Ilc

-0.02 Ila

-0.04
0 50 100 150 200 250
Sample (Time)
Three Phases Differential Currents
in External Fault
Differential Currents Vs. Sample (time)
80
Idiffb
70 Idiffa

60

50

40

30

20

10
Idiffc
0
0 50 100 150
Sample (Time)
. Three Phases Differential
Currents in Internal Fault
Differential Currents Vs. Sample (time)
160
Idiffa

140

120

100

80

60

40

Idiffb
20 Idiffc

0
0 50 100 150
Sample (Time)
Three Phases Differential Currents
in Inrush Current
Differential Currents Vs. Sample (time)
Idiffa
90

80
Idiffc
70
Idiffb
60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Sample (Time)
Decision Space in External Fault
for three Phases
Fault Zone Bound:Solid line ,Idiff Locus:Dotted line
300

200
|Idiffa|

100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
300

200
|Idiffb|

100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
300

200
|Idiffc|

100

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Irest1
Decision Space in Internal Fault for
Three Phases
Fault Zone Bound:Solid line ,Idiff Locus:Dotted line
|Idiffa| 200

100

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
150

100
|Idiffb|

50

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
150

100
|Idiffc|

50

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Irest1
Decision Space in Inrush Current
for Three Phases
Fault Zone Bound:Solid line ,Idiff Locus:Dotted line
|Idiffa| 100

50

0
0 50 100 150 200
60

40
|Idiffb|

20

0
0 50 100 150 200
60

40
|Idiffc|

20

0
0 50 100 150 200
Irest1
Second/Fundamental Harmonic
Ratio for External Fault
Ratio of Second Harmonic to Fundamental (External Fault)
1.5

1
Irest2/Irest1

0.5

0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Samples (Time)
Second/Fundamental Harmonic
Ratio for Internal Fault
Ratio of Second Harmonic to Fundamental (Internal Fault)
1.5

1
Irest2/Irest1

0.5

0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Samples (Time)
Second/Fundamental Harmonic
Ratio for Inrush Current
Ratio of Second Harmonic to Fundamental (Inrush)
1.5

1
Irest2/Irest1

0.5

0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Samples (Time)
General Trip Alarm for External
Fault
Tripping Command of Phases(External Fault)
2

1.5

No Trip Command
1
Trip Signal

0.5

-0.5

-1
0 50 100 150
Samples
General Trip Alarm for Internal
Fault
Tripping Command of Phases(Internal Fault)
2

1.5 Trip command begins at sample 95

1
Trip Signal

0.5

-0.5

-1
0 50 100 150
Samples
General Trip Alarm for Inrush
Current
Tripping Command of phases (Inrush)
2

1.5

1
No Trip Command
Trip Signal

0.5

-0.5

-1
0 50 100 150 200 250
Samples
Summary
 A digital differential relay for transformer
protection was presented.
 Two estimator systems: Walsh series and least
squares algorithms were formulated and
designed.
 The differential protection decision maker
subsystem was introduced.
 Current signals harmonic components and
second harmonic restraint concept were utilized
in decision maker subsystem.
Conclusion
 In a practical case study, the designed
relay performance was tested under three
real circumstances: external fault, internal
fault and inrush current.
 It was shown -using graphs and
illustrations- that the presented relay
issues trip alarm for transformer internal
fault, and does not issue trip alarm for
external fault and inrush current situations.
Conclusion (Ctd)
 It were seen that both estimation
algorithms perform their job correctly.
 Walsh series acts better than least
squares algorithm, especially on second
harmonic estimation.
 An anti alias filter (for example a
Butterworth one) will improve response of
the estimator.

You might also like