You are on page 1of 19

Norton Media Library

Chapter 2
Claims

Joel Best
Rhetoric of Claims
Claimsmakers attempt to persuade others
that something is a social problem.

What are some examples of this?

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
Rhetoric is the study of persuasion.
Constructing social problems is
rhetorical.
Three fundamental components of
persuasive arguments:
◦ Grounds
◦ Warrants
◦ Conclusions

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
Grounds: identifying the troubling
condition
◦ Grounds often follow a rhetorical recipe with
three ingredients.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
1. Grounds often start with a typifying
example of the problem.
 These stories do not always reflect
“typical” cases.
2. The problem is named and given an
orientation.
 Type of medical condition, abuse, etc.
3. Statistics imply how bad the condition
is.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
More rhetorical devices used to establish
grounds:
◦ Claiming that the problem is getting
progressively worse
◦ Categorizing the problem as a recognizable
type, such as crime or disease

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
More rhetorical devices used to establish
grounds:
◦ Painting the groups involved as either victims
or villains
◦ Claiming that many different kinds of people
are hurt by the troubling condition
◦ Challenging preexisting ways of constructing
the social problem

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
Warrants: explaining why people should
care
◦ A claim’s warrants justify doing something.
◦ Claims utilize values.
◦ Since different people have different values,
claimsmakers use multiple warrants to cover
the reasons why people might care.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Rhetoric of Claims
Conclusions: what should be done
◦ The proposed solutions must be in line with
the grounds and warrants.
◦ Conclusions can include both short-term and
long-term goals and policy changes.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
Valence issues:
◦ Conditions that nearly everyone will agree are
significant social problems
Position issues:
◦ Divisive, controversial topics
 It is more difficult to find agreement, so
claimsmakers target sympathetic audiences.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
Audiences for claims can be segmented.
◦ Segmented audiences may have different
interests and ideologies.
◦ Certain demographic groups worry more
about certain social problems than others.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
Audiences are not passive.
◦ They may seek out some claims and reject
others, picking and choosing social problems.
◦ Successful claimsmakers pay attention to how
audiences respond to their claims.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
Social problems marketplace
◦ Audiences hear claims about many problems.
◦ Claimsmakers struggle to get and keep the
attention of the audience.
◦ Even if an issue is well-established,
claimsmakers need to keep refining claims.
 They risk losing the attention of policymakers, the
media, and the general public.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
How do claimsmakers refine claims?
◦ Domain expansion: claimsmakers broaden
the definition of the problem, adding in more
victims to help and villains to confront.
◦ Piggyback: claimsmakers can rely on
established problems and allow newer claims
to build upon older ones.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Claims and Audiences
Most claims inspire counterclaims.
◦ Counterclaims often involve disputes over
grounds or warrants.
 “Stat wars” focus on which statistics are true.
 Debates over ideologies are usually linked to
warrants.
 Both sides modify claims as a response to
counterclaims.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Cultural Resources
Claimsmakers can make any kind of
claim.
◦ However, their claims need to make sense to
the intended audiences.
Claimsmaking requires an understanding
of the cultural context in which claims are
made.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Cultural Resources

Claimsmakers tap into cultural resources,


the well of words, ideas, and images that
most people (of that culture) respond to.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Cultural Resources

Culture is constantly changing.


Claimsmakers are not always consistent in
the cultural resources that they use.
◦ They might frame the same issue in many ways
to appeal to a variety of audiences.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company
Cultural Resources
Cultural resources both enrich and limit
the claimsmaking process.
◦ They provide a broad range of words, images,
and ideas to use.
◦ They constrain claimsmakers by making them
ground claims.

Social Problems, Third Edition


Copyright © 2016 W.W. Norton & Company

You might also like