Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
How?
Dr.C.Susila,Msc (N),PhD, MBA,
Principal
Billroth College of Nursing
Chennai
introduction
Mr Smith is 64 years old and recently diagnosed with atrial
fibrillation (AF), a condition associated with a high risk of
stroke. You wish to know if prescribing warfarin will reduce
his risk of stroke?
Reviews
What is a systematic review?
Subjective
Objective
Narrow question
Broad question Methods clearly defined
Methods unclear Studies appraised
Who undertakes systematic reviews?
• Multidisciplinary teams
– Clinicians
– Health services researchers
– Information scientists
– Statisticians
– Health Economists
– Patient and public involvement
What are the steps in performing a systematic review?
Data extraction /checking
Define research/review question Develop data extraction from into which study information and outcome
In consultation/collaboration with the clinical community, data can be extracted, checked & verified
commissioners and patient/public representatives
Study assessment/appraisal
Develop review protocol Assess the quality and validity of the included studies using the pre-defined
Pre-specify the type of studies to be included, the methods of method.
collating, appraising and analysing data
Synthesis
Identify relevant studies Narratively and/or statistically summarise/describe the data, exploring
Develop a comprehensive search strategy and undertake similarities and differences between studies.
systematic searches of the literature
Assess eligibility
Select those studies which meet the pre-defined inclusion Knowledge translation
criteria Review details and results are disseminated to relevant target audiences
using appropriate formats
Cochrane graphic illustration of the systematic review process
?
Delay or not delay?
step 1 Develop a focused research question
favourable
Outcome 2 return to former activity and/or
The goal of the literature search is to discover all studies that meet the
inclusion criteria
◦ Search comprehensively
Terminology
Databases
◦ Search for grey literature
Not commercially published
◦ Search for unpublished studies
Reduce risk of publication bias
Search strategy
Interdisciplinary databases
◦ Scopus
◦ Web of Science
Specialized databases
◦ CINAHL Plus
◦ PsycINFO
Supplementary searching techniques
Conference proceedings
◦ EMBASE
◦ Scopus
◦ Web of Science
◦ Google
Sources of unpublished literature
Clinical trials
◦ ClinicalTrials.gov
◦ Centerwatch.com
◦ EU Clinical Trials Register
◦ ISRCTN Registry
◦ OpenTrials
◦ WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
Compile search results
• Have one or a few studies reported data differently from the others?
• Will the data still be useful?
• Should you include it?
• Make sure the core information extracted is the same
• You may need to update the form, or have more than one form
• Any changes need to be agreed and made consistently
Stay on track……
• Be careful about collecting ‘extra’ data
• It is very tempting to collect data that are not directly relevant to the
review question
• The data needed to answer the review question should have already been
decided (REMEMBER YOUR PROTOCOL)
• Collect data for good reasons – stay focused and don’t get side-tracked
Instead
of/alongside
meta-analysis
Potential bias in
presentation
Lack of a take
home message
Tools for narrative synthesis
Partly informed by methodological work in qualitative
synthesis
◦ Tabulation
◦ Groupings and clusters
◦ Vote counting as a descriptive tool
◦ Examination of moderator variables (elements of e.g. setting,
population)
Rodgers et al Evaluation 2009 15 49-72
Tables and Figures
Cochrane
Handbook
Summary of findings table using GRADE methodology
Forest Plot
Forest Plot
A graphical display designed to illustrate the relative strength
of treatment effects in multiple quantitative scientific studies
addressing the same question (meta-analysis)
Forest Plot
Names of fictional studies on left; odds ratios and confidence intervals on right; odds ratios
(squares proportional to weights used in meta-analysis); summary measure (center line of
diamond); associated confidence intervals (lateral tips of diamond); solid vertical line of no
effect
step-8 translation of knowledge Interpret results and draw
conclusions
Cochrane Collaboration
◦ Cochrane Library
Cochrane protocols, systematic reviews, other reviews and trials
◦ Guides and handbooks
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Cochrane Standards for conduct and reporting of new reviews of interventions
GRADE Handbook
◦ Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias
ROBIS: Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews
ROBINS-I tool: Risk of Bias in Non-randomized studies of Interventions
RoB 2.0 tool (revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials
◦ Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews
Registries, tools and archives
Software
◦ Software for Systematic Reviewing
◦ Software
Programs for Preparing and Maintaining Systema
tic Reviews
◦ Systematic Review Toolbox
Most important thing:
Be organised!!!
Gantt charts
Reference management
Smith, Mary Lee, and Gene V. Glass. (1980) "Meta-Analysis of Research on Class Size and
Its Relationship to Attitudes and Instruction.“American Education Research Journal,
17,419-433
Whitehead, MF & Becker, BJ (2000). The Young Child’s Post-Divorce Adjustment: A Meta-
Analysis with implications for parenting arrangements. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 5-26.
Thank you