Diversification

Diversification Strategy
Strategy

OUTLINE
OUTLINE

• Introduction: The Basic Issues

• The Trend over Time
• Motives for Diversification
- Growth and Risk Reduction
- Shareholder Value: Porter’s Essential Tests
• Competitive Advantage from Diversification
• Diversification and Performance: Empirical Evidence
• Relatedness in Diversification
The
The Basic
Basic Issues
Issues in
in Diversification
Diversification Decisions
Decisions

Superior profit derives from two sources:

INDUSTRY
ATTRACTIVENESS
RATE OF PROFIT
> COST OF CAPITAL
COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE

Diversification decisions involve these same two issues:

• How attractive is the sector to be entered?
•Can the firm achieve a competitive advantage?
Diversification
Diversificationamong
amongthe
theUS
US Fortune
Fortune500,
500,1949-74
1949-74

70.2 63.5 53.7 53.9 39.9 37.0

29.8 36.5 46.3 46.1 60.1 63.0

1949 1954 1959 1964

Percentage of Specialized Companies (single-business,
1969 1974
vertically-integrated and dominant-business)
Percentage of Diversified Companies (related-business
and unrelated business)

Note: During the 1980s and 1990s the trend reversed as large
companies refocused upon their core businesses
 Diversification
Diversification among
amongLarge
LargeUK
UK
Corporations,
Corporations,1950-93
1950-93

70
60
Single business
50
40 Dominant
business
30 Related business
20
Unrelated
10 business
0
1950 1960 1970 1983 1993
 Diversification: The Evolution of Strategy and
Management Thinking

MANAGEMENT Addressing under- Creating •Competitive

PRIORITIES Quest for Growth performance of shareholder advantage through
widely-diversified value speed & flexibility
firms •Creating
opportunities for
future growth

•Emergence of •Refocusing on •Joint ventures and

Emphasis on
DEVELOPMENTS conglomerates core alliances
“related’ &
IN CORPORATE businesses •Creating growth
•Diversification by “concentric”
STRATEGY established companies diversification •Divesting options
into related sectors diversified through focused
businesses diversification

•Financial analysis •Economies of •Maximization •Dynamic

STRATEGY TOOLS •Diffusion of M form scope & synergy” of shareholder capabilities
& CONCEPTS structures • Portfolio planning wealth •Transaction cost
•Creation of models •Core analysis
corporate planning • Capital asset competences •Real options
depts. pricing model •Dominant logic

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006

 Motives
Motives for
for Diversification
Diversification

GROWTH --The desire to escape stagnant or declining industries

a powerful motives for diversification (e.g. tobacco,
oil, newspapers).
--But, growth satisfies managers not shareholders.
--Growth strategies (esp. by acquisition), tend to
destroy shareholder value

RISK --Diversification reduces variance of profit flows

SPREADING --But, doesn’t create value for shareholders—they can
hold diversified portfolios of securities.
--Capital Asset Pricing Model shows that diversification
lowers unsystematic risk not systematic risk.

PROFIT --For diversification to create shareholder value, then

bringing together of different businesses under
common ownership & must somehow increase
their profitability.
 Diversification
Diversification and
and Shareholder
Shareholder Value:
Value:
Porter’s
Porter’s Three
Three Essential
Essential Tests
Tests
If diversification is to create shareholder value, it must meet
three tests:

1. The Attractiveness Test: diversification must be directed

towards attractive industries (or have the potential to
become attractive).

2. The Cost of Entry Test : the cost of entry must not capitalize
all future profits.

3. The Better-Off Test: either the new unit must gain

competitive advantage from its link with the company, or
vice-versa. (i.e. some form of “synergy” must be present)

Additional source of value from diversification: Option value

 Competitive
Competitive Advantage
Advantage from
from Diversification
Diversification
• Predatory pricing/tie-in sales Evidence
MARKET • Reciprocal buying of these
POWER • Mutual forbearance is sparse

• Sharing tangible resources (research labs, distribution

systems) across multiple businesses
ECONOMIES • Sharing intangible resources (brands, technology) across
OF multiple businesses
SCOPE • Transferring functional capabilities (marketing, product
development) across businesses
• Applying general management capabilities to multiple
businesses

• Economies of scope not a sufficient basis for

ECONOMIES diversification ----must be supported by transaction costs
FROM • Diversification firm can avoid transaction costs by
INTERNALIZING operating internal capital and labor markets
TRANSACTIONS • Key advantage of diversified firm over external markets---
superior access to information
 Relatedness
Relatedness in
in Diversification
Diversification

Economies of scope in diversification derive from two

types of relatedness:
• Operational Relatedness-- synergies from sharing
resources across businesses (common distribution
facilities, brands, joint R&D)
• Strategic Relatedness-- synergies at the corporate level
deriving from the ability to apply common management
capabilities to different businesses.

Problem of operational relatedness:- the benefits in terms

of economies of scope may be dwarfed by the
administrative costs involved in their exploitation.
 Branson
Branson&&the
theVirgin
VirginCompanies:
Companies:Making
Makingstrategic
strategic
sense
senseof
ofapparent
apparententrepreneurial
entrepreneurialchaos
chaos
KEY RESOURCES
•Virgin brand
•Branson DOMINANT LOGIC
-charisma/image •Seek competitive advantage by start-up cos.
--PR skills pursuing innovative differentiation in
-networking skills underserved market with sleepy incumbents
-entrepreneurial flair
CHARACTERISTICS OF
DESIGNING A CORPORATE STRATEGY MARKETSTHAT CONFORM
& STRUCTURE TO THIS LOGIC
• What’s the business model? •Consumer businesses
(Does Virgin create value by •dominant incumbent
being an entrepreneurial incubator, •scope for new approaches
a venture capital fund, a to customer service
diversified corporation, or what?) •high entry barriers to other
• Which businesses to divest? start-ups
• Criteria for future diversification •Branson/Virgin image
• What type of structure?—Is there appeals to customers
a need for greater formalization?