One of the well-known analytical solutions for EGS was developed by Gringarten

et al. (1975). Although it was idealized, it nonetheless provided fundamental concepts in

heat and fluid flow between rock and conductive fractures. In order for generalized
illustrations, the solution was presented in a compact form using dimensionless
variables, where actual dimensions and units can be determine separately depending
on different assumption and condition of each geothermal reservoir. Gringarten et al.
(1975) had based their solution start from one fracture that is part of a parallel set with a
uniform half-spacing , as shown in Figure 2.1. The fractures were in a reservoir with
height y, width x, and distance between the water inlet and outlet z. Fluid with a total
rate Q was assumed to enters each uniform aperture fracture at one end, and exits
through the other. And q represents the flow rate inside each fracture and can be
calculated directly.
• One of the well-known analytical solutions for EGS was developed by Gringarten
• et al. (1975). Although it was idealized, it nonetheless provided fundamental concepts in
• heat and fluid flow between rock and conductive fractures. In order for generalized
• illustrations, the solution was presented in a compact form using dimensionless
• variables, where actual dimensions and units can be determine separately depending
• on different assumption and condition of each geothermal reservoir. Gringarten et al.
• (1975) had based their solution start from one fracture that is part of a parallel set with a
• uniform half-spacing , as shown in Figure 2.1. The fractures were in a reservoir with
• height y, width x, and distance between the water inlet and outlet z. Fluid with a total
• rate Q was assumed to enters each uniform aperture fracture at one end, and exits
• through the other. And q represents the flow rate inside each fracture and can be
• calculated directly.
• One of the well-known analytical solutions for EGS was developed by Gringarten
• et al. (1975). Although it was idealized, it nonetheless provided fundamental concepts in
• heat and fluid flow between rock and conductive fractures. In order for generalized
• illustrations, the solution was presented in a compact form using dimensionless
• variables, where actual dimensions and units can be determine separately depending
• on different assumption and condition of each geothermal reservoir. Gringarten et al.
• (1975) had based their solution start from one fracture that is part of a parallel set with a
• uniform half-spacing , as shown in Figure 2.1. The fractures were in a reservoir with
• height y, width x, and distance between the water inlet and outlet z. Fluid with a total
• rate Q was assumed to enters each uniform aperture fracture at one end, and exits
• through the other. And q represents the flow rate inside each fracture and can be
• calculated directly.
• One of the well-known analytical solutions for EGS was developed by Gringarten
• et al. (1975). Although it was idealized, it nonetheless provided fundamental concepts in
• heat and fluid flow between rock and conductive fractures. In order for generalized
• illustrations, the solution was presented in a compact form using dimensionless
• variables, where actual dimensions and units can be determine separately depending
• on different assumption and condition of each geothermal reservoir. Gringarten et al.
• (1975) had based their solution start from one fracture that is part of a parallel set with a
• uniform half-spacing , as shown in Figure 2.1. The fractures were in a reservoir with
• height y, width x, and distance between the water inlet and outlet z. Fluid with a total
• rate Q was assumed to enters each uniform aperture fracture at one end, and exits
• through the other. And q represents the flow rate inside each fracture and can be
• calculated directly.