Data shows.............

• According to ICT statistics in 2013, the Philippines ranked 94 th in 2010 and

103rd in 2013 out of 166 countries. – rappler, 2013

• 6 February 2017 — The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) recently

released a report on the status of ICT sector development in different
countries around the world. The 2016 Measuring the Information Society
Report ranked the Philippines at 107th, which is one rank lower than last
year’s ranking of 106th[1]. For 2016, 175 countries were included in the survey.

• The Philippines ranked 9th among the 30 lower-middle-income countries and

placed 13th among 15 countries in Southeast Asia and Oceania, which was
described as “below average.” – business world, 2018
 “COMPUTER
LITERACY among
TVL Students through
ICT Integration”
 Constructivism

Computer literacy of Computer Literacy of

SMAW students Dressmaking Students

MS word, Powerpoint MS word, Powerpoint

and excel and excel

ICT integration in
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. subjects 4
Publishing as Prentice Hall
 Objectives
1. Determine the profile background of the respondent in terms of gender, age and
interest and experience.
2. Determine the proficiency level of the respondent in terms of Microsoft Word,
Microsoft Excel and Microsoft PowerPoint.
3. Determine the significant impact of the intervention in the computer literacy of TVL
students.
METHODOLOGY Use of computer
and internet
facilities

T-Test for dependent

Ict integration in samples
Pre – assessment in TVL subjects Post assessment in
students computer Treatment of data to
students computer
literacy determine the
literacy
significant impact of
the intervention
Access to
Descriptive Survey Design information
Validation of the instrument
Reliability of the instrument
Cronbach’s Alpha
Information
processing
FINDING
SComputer Literacy Level of Respondents
Computer Application Weighted Mean Descriptive Equivalent
1.Uses Microsoft Word 2.70 Good
2.Uses Microsoft Excel 1.98 Poor
3.Uses Microsoft PowerPoint 1.50 Very Poor
4.Shout down computer appropriately 3.70 Very Good
5.Understand the difference between
Closing minimizing/hiding windows 2.20 Poor
6.Using mouse to right click menu function 2.45 Poor
7.Able to organize copy and paste files
In direction 1.48 Very Poor
8.Able to edit, copy, cut and paste
a block of text 2.28 Poor
9.Able to use undo/redo functions 2.28 Poor
10.Able to save, print and preview document 2.58 Poor
11.Able to change font size and style 2.60 Poor
12.Able to create Itemized list 2.13 Poor
13.Able to change printer parameter
like page 2.60 Poor

Average 2.34 Poor

Note. 1.00-1.80 –Very Good; 1.81-2.60 – Poor;2.61-3.40-Good;3.41-4.20-Very Good;4.21-5.00-Excellent.

Profile of the Respondents
Interest Frequency Percentage
Yes 35 87.5
NO 5 12.5
TOTAL 40 100

Experience Frequency Percentage

Yes 21 52.5
No 19 47.5
Total 40 100
FINDINGS
Pre-test and Post-test

Observation Mean SD t-value P-value Decision Interpretation

Pre-test 15.175 4.814 27.38 0.000 Reject Ho Significant

Post-test 41.625 4.271
Difference 26.450 6.110

Level of Significant a 0.05

FINDINGS
The tabular values reveal that there is a significant improvement on the computer literacy level of
respondents after the intervention program.
P-value(000) less than alpha(0.05)
RECOMMENDATIONS

Anchored on the conclusion of the study, the following are recommended:

1. COMPUTER-Aided instruction

2. Tutorial

2. Assessed Computer Literacy of Students.

3. Proposing Computer Literacy Program.

4. Training
THANK YOU !!!
END
GOD BLESS