Relationships: - in Bibliographic Records and in Authority Records

Module 5:
Relationships
-- in bibliographic records and

in authority records
RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 1

Relationships: two parts
• The entities being related
– Work, expression, manifestation, item,
person, family, corporate body, etc.
– Identified by the authorized access point or
an identifier or a description (RDA 18.4;
RDA 24.4
• The type of relationship

– Identified by a relationship designator --
library policy or cataloger’s judgment to use
Entities in relationships: Group 2
to Group 1
• Persons, families, and corporate bodies
related to a resource -- relationships in
bibliographic records
– Creators and others associated with works
(ch. 19) -- discussed in module 3
– Contributors associated with expressions
(ch. 20)
– Entities related to manifestations (ch. 21)
– Entities related to items (ch. 22)
Relationships between
persons/families/bodies and
resources
Person
Work
created
was created by
Shakespeare Hamlet

5
RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5
[Screen image from the RDA Toolkit (www.rdatoolkit.org) used by permission
of the Co-Publishers for RDA (American Library Association, Canadian Library
Association, and CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals)]
Primary relationships
• Two entities covered by naming the work
or expression (the counterpart to AACR2
“main entry” in MARC):
– Work manifested (RDA 17.8)
– Expression manifested (RDA 17.10)
• Compilations discussed in module 3:

analytical access points for 17.8 & 17.10

Relationship for entities
related to works
• Give as authorized access point in MARC 1XX
field (and 7XX field if more than one creator or
if not a creator) in bibliographic record
• Relationship designators from RDA appendix

I.2 in subfield $e of 1XX and 7XX field -- not
required
– Not a closed list
– Do not include $e in name authority record

Relationships with works -- examples
• Examples of creators:
110 $a Society of Linguists, $e author.

710 $a Linguists International, $e author.
100 $a Glass, Philip, $e composer.
110 $a Virginia, $e enacting jurisdiction.
• Examples of others associated with works (19.3):

710 $a U.S. Geology Society, $e issuing body.
710 $a ABC Institute, $e sponsoring body.
Contributor (RDA 20.2):
relationship with expressions
• A person, family, or corporate body
associated with an expression, e.g.,
– Translators
– Editors of compilations
– Performers
– Illustrators
– Arrangers of music
– Compilers

Relationship for contributors
• Give as authorized access point in MARC
7XX fields in bibliographic record
• Relationship designators from RDA

appendix I.3 in subfield $e of 7XX field - not
required
Example: contributor
100 1# $a Wood, Audrey.

245 14 $a The napping house / $c Audrey Wood
; illustrated by Don Wood.
700 1# $a Wood, Don, $e illustrator.
Notes: 1) Relationship designator “author” could be given

for creator in 100 field.
2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also,
it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field.

100 1# $a Lindgren, Astrid, $d 1907-2002,
$e author.
240 10 $a Pippi Långstrump. $l English
245 10 $a Pippi Longstocking / $c Astrid
Lindgren ; translated by Tiina Nunnally.
700 1# $a Nunnally, Tiina, $d 1952- $e
translator.
Notes: 1) Relationship designators “author” and “translator”

could be given -- cataloger judgment.
2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also,
it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field.
245 $a Favorite American music / $c performed

by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra with
Marin Alsop conducting..
505 $a ...
710 $a Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, $e
performer.
700 $a Alsop, Marin, $e conductor.*
* Could have used the more general “$e performer” for Alsop.

Entities associated with
manifestations (RDA 21.0)

associated with a manifestation, e.g.,
– Producers
– Publishers (e.g., broadcasters)
– Manufacturers (e.g., engravers, printers)
– Distributors (e.g., film distributor)

Entities associated with manifestations
• Give as authorized access point in
MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record
• Specific relationship designators from

RDA appendix I.4 in subfield $e of 7XX
field -- not required
– Not “producer,” “publisher,” “manufacturer,”
“distributor” -- they are elements
Examples: manifestation
260 $a Bethesda : $b NIH, $c 2008.
710 $a National Institutes of Health (U.S.),
$e broadcaster.
260 $a St. Paul : $b West Publishing Company,

$c 2011-
710 $a West Publishing Company.*
* Cannot use “publisher” as an RDA relationship

designator because that relationship is an element.

Entities associated with items
(RDA 22.0)

associated with an item, e.g.,
– Owners
– Custodians
– Curators

Entities associated with items
• Give as authorized access point in
MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record
• Relationship designators from RDA

appendix I.5 in subfield $e of 7XX field --
not required

Example: item
500 $a University Library's copy has

ms. notes by author on endpapers.
$5 IaH
700 $a Smiley, Jane, $e annotator.
541 $c Gift; $a John Jefferson; $d 2011.

$5 DLC
700 $a Jefferson, John, $e donor.

• Relationships between works, expressions,
manifestations, and items -- relationships in
bibliographic and/or authority records:
– Related works (ch. 25)

– Related expressions (ch. 26)
– Related manifestations (ch. 27)
– Related items (ch. 28)

Related work (RDA 25.1)
• Common work relationships:
– Whole-part, e.g.,
• Works in a compilation
• Chapters in a book
– Adaptations
– Supplements
– Sequential relationships (e.g., earlier and
later serials)

Relationship: related work
• Three methods (RDA 24.4)
– Identifier (not used alone for now)
– Authorized access point
– Description (structured or unstructured)
• Cataloger judgment to use relationship

designators in RDA appendix J.2 in
subfield $i if MARC content designation
doesn’t indicate relationship
Structured/unstructured
description
• Structured description = note or linking
field: indicate elements by ISBD
punctuation or MARC tagging
• Unstructured description = note using

narrative rather a formal tagged
structure to indicate the relationship

Whole-part relationships
• No limit on number of works, unless

burdensome, in MARC 505 contents note
• Cataloger’s judgment for number of MARC

7XX analytical authorized access points if
that is the method used to give the
relationship
• Don’t need to justify the 7XX analytical

access points by a 505 field
Whole-part work example
Authorized access points for the works:
100 1# $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.

245 10 $a Hamlet ; $b King Lear / $c William
Shakespeare.
*700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.
$t Hamlet.
*700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.
$t King Lear.
* 2nd indicator in 700 indicates the relationship “Contains”

Example: serial related works
Structured descriptions and three identifiers each:
245 00 $a TCA journal.

785 00 $t Journal of professional counseling,
practice, theory, & research $x 1556-
6382 $w (DLC) 2005205756 $w (OCoLC)
55891574
245 00 $a Journal of professional counseling,
practice, theory, & research.
780 00 $t TCA journal $x 1556-4223 $w (DLC)
93645762 $w (OCoLC) 26906768
785 indicators 00 = relationship “Continued by”

780 indicators 00 = relationship “Continues”
Related expression (RDA 26.1)
• Common expression relationships:

– Whole-part (e.g., translations in a
compilation)
– Revisions
– Editions
– Translations
– Language editions
– Abridgements
Relationship: related expression
• Three methods (RDA 24.4)
– Identifier (not used alone in US RDA Test)
– Authorized access point

does not give relationship
Whole-part expression example
Authorized access points for the expressions:
100 1# $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952-

245 10 $a Two Norwegian novels / $c Per
Petterson.
700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Ut og
stjæle hester. $l English.
700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Til
Sibir. $l English.
Could also include a contents note but not required to justify
the access points; or, a contents note without the 700 fields
would be possible: 505 0# $a Out stealing horses -- To Siberia.
Example: serial related expression
Unstructured description for other language edition:
130 0# $a Revista de política y derecho

ambientales en América Latina y el
Caribe. $l English.
245 10 $a Journal of environmental policy
and law in Latin America and the
Caribbean.
580 ## $a Issued also in Spanish under title:
Revista de política y derecho
ambientales en América Latina y el
Caribe.
Related expression - translation
(example 1)
Authorized access point:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French
245 10 $a Forteresse digitale.
700 1# $i Translation of: $a Brown, Dan,
$d 1964- $t Digital fortress.

(example 2)
Structured description in 500 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

500 ## $a Translation of: Digital fortress /
Dan Brown. -- 1st ed. -- New York :
St. Martin’s Press, 1998. -- 371
pages ; 22 cm.

(example 3)
Structured description in 765 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

*765 0# $a Brown, Dan, 1964- $t Digital
fortress $b 1st ed. $d New York :
St. Martin’s Press, 1998. $h 371
pages ; 22 cm $w (DLC) 9703318
* 2nd indicator “blank” = “Translation of”

(example 4)
Unstructured description in 500 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

500 ## $a Translation of the author’s novel
Digital fortress.

Related manifestation (RDA 27.1)
• Common manifestation relationships:
– Reproductions
– Different formats for same expression (e.g.,
book vs. CD; book vs. PDF)
– Special issues

Related manifestation (RDA 27.1)
• Two methods (RDA 24.4)

– Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test)
– Not by an authorized access point

Related manifestation example
245 00 $a Health statistics for elementary

-school children.
260 ## $a Baltimore : $b Johns Hopkins
University, $c 2009-
300 ## $a volumes ; $c 27 cm
776 08 $i Also issued as: $t Health statistics
for elementary-school children $d
Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University,
$c 2009- $h CD-ROMs : 4 3/4 in.

Related item (RDA 28.1)
• Common item relationships

– Reproduction of a specific copy
– “Bound with”
– Item added to copy of manifestation in a
special collection
• Relationships that apply only to a single

copy of the manifestation -- so, usually
local information
Related item (RDA 28.1)
• Two methods (RDA 24.4)
– Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test)


Related item examples
500 $i Bound with: $a ___________. $5 DLC
775 $i Reprint of (item): $t Hiking in

Unicoi State Park $d Helen, GA : RST
Publishers, 1955. $h 22 p. : ill. ;
19 cm.

• Relationships between persons, families,
and corporate bodies -- relationships in
authority records:
– Related persons (ch. 30)

– Related families (ch. 31)
– Related corporate bodies (ch. 32)

Related persons, families,
and/or corporate bodies
• Relationship recorded in authority record in
5XX field
– Can also give relationship designator from RDA
appendix K in subfield $i to identify specific
relationship
– Some relationships in MARC indicated by values
in subfield $w (e.g., “a” and “b” for earlier and later
corporate bodies) -- cataloger judgment or library
policy to use in lieu of subfield $i
Examples: person related to
corporate body or family
100 1# $a Garr, Arnold K.
510 2# $w r $i Employer: $a Brigham Young
University
100 1# $a Carroll, Charles N. $q (Charles

Nagus), $d 1817-1902
500 3# $w r $i Descendants: $a Carroll
(Family : $g Carroll, Charles N.
(Charles Negus), 1817-1902)

Examples: related corporate
bodies
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and
Standards Division
510 2# $w r $i Predecessor: $a Library of
Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and
Support Office
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging

Policy and Support Office
510 2# $w r $i Successor: $a Library of
Congress. $b Policy and Standards
Division

Examples: related corporate bodies
Giving specific relationship in $w:
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and

Standards Division
510 2# $w a $a Library of Congress. $b
Cataloging Policy and Support Office
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging

Policy and Support Office
510 2# $w b $a Library of Congress. $b
Policy and Standards Division

Review
• “Relate”: 2nd main goal of RDA (1st = identify)
• Relationships within and between FRBR Group 1
(work, expression, manifestation, item) and Group
2 (person, family, corporate body) entities
• Relationship designators in appendices I, J, and K
• Questions?
Then: Exercises #7 and #8

Relationships: - in Bibliographic Records and in Authority Records

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Relationships: - in Bibliographic Records and in Authority Records

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module 5:

-- in bibliographic records and

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 1

• The type of relationship

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 4

• Compilations discussed in module 3:

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 6

• Relationship designators from RDA appendix

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 7

110 $a Society of Linguists, $e author.

100 $a Glass, Philip, $e composer.

110 $a Virginia, $e enacting jurisdiction.

• Examples of others associated with works (19.3):

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 9

• Relationship designators from RDA

100 1# $a Wood, Audrey.

Notes: 1) Relationship designator “author” could be given

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 11

Notes: 1) Relationship designators “author” and “translator”

245 $a Favorite American music / $c performed

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 13

• A person, family, or corporate body

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 14

• Specific relationship designators from

260 $a St. Paul : $b West Publishing Company,

* Cannot use “publisher” as an RDA relationship

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 16

• A person, family, or corporate body

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 17

• Relationship designators from RDA

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 18

500 $a University Library's copy has

541 $c Gift; $a John Jefferson; $d 2011.

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 19

– Related works (ch. 25)

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 20

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 21

• Cataloger judgment to use relationship

• Unstructured description = note using

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 23

• No limit on number of works, unless

• Cataloger’s judgment for number of MARC

• Don’t need to justify the 7XX analytical

Authorized access points for the works:

100 1# $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.

* 2nd indicator in 700 indicates the relationship “Contains”

245 00 $a TCA journal.

785 indicators 00 = relationship “Continued by”

• Common expression relationships:

• Cataloger judgment to use relationship

100 1# $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952-

130 0# $a Revista de política y derecho

Authorized access point:

100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 31

Structured description in 500 field:

100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

RDA for Georgia 9-10 August 2011 - Module 5 32

100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-

* 2nd indicator “blank” = “Translation of”

Unstructured description in 500 field:

100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-