unions-size, frequency distribution, factors responsible for the small size Finance-sources of income, ways of improving finance. Size of Indian trade Unions From their very inception, the average size of Indian trade unions has been very small and has continued to decline during the course of years. The average membership of trade unions in the country varied between 3,500 and 1,000 during 1927–48, but since then it has always been below 1,000 mark in almost all subsequent years, the lowest of 460 recorded in 1993. Size of Trade Union : India Vs UK In sharp contrast to the position in the United Kingdom, where over 70 per cent of union membership is concentrated in unions having 2.5 lakh and above, in India bulk of union membership has been concentrated in unions having membership of less than 10,000. The main factors responsible for the small size of Indian trade unions
(i) factory or establishment being the unit of
union formation in an overwhelmingly large number of cases, (ii) ease of registration under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, The main factors responsible for the small size of Indian trade unions
(iii) preponderance of small-sized
factories and establishments, (iv) widespread union rivalry and multiplicity of unions and (v) availability of union leaders in abundance CASE STUDY: 1 What are the factors responsible for the small size of Indian trade unions?
In the city of Bhagalpur, a silk centre, there
are 100 silk mills employing 50 and more workers each and an altogether 200 registered trade unions have been operating in these mills. CASE STUDY: 1 What are the factors responsible for the small size of Indian trade unions?
The central federations of trade unions and
local leaders have been vying with each other to have their control over as many trade unions as possible. Having been dissatisfied with the outside leadership, workers of quite a number of mills preferred to form unions exclusively of workers and got these registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926. CASE STUDY: 1 What are the factors responsible for the small size of Indian trade unions?
It was very difficult for many employers to
manage their business on account of the regular pressures from different sets of unions and many of them had to incur losses and a few were forced to close their businesses. QUESTIONS ON CASE STUDY-1 How is it possible to establish 200 trade unions in the city when the number of silk mills is only 100? Is it possible for outside leaders to form five
trade unions in a single mill and get them
registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926? What factors are responsible for the small
size of trade unions in the city?
What are the effects of multiplicity of small-
sized unions in the city?
Financial health of ITU Along with the small average size of unions, their income has also been low. The average annual income per union in the country was below 3,000 between 1951 and 1963, and it stood at between 3,000 and 10,000 between 1964 and 1980. After 1981, there has been some improvements, when it generally stood between 10,000 and 40,000 up to 1999. Only from 1999 onwards, the income crossed 50,000 mark. However, in view of a continuous increase in prices, the increase in income has been nullified by rise in prices to an appreciable extent. Case Study 2: Why are the finances of Indian trade unions poor?
In a cement factory in Madhya Pradesh, there
are 4,000 workers of whom 3,000 are union members distributed amongst six registered trade unions A.1–A.6 and two unregistered trade unions B.1–B.2 operating in the factory. Case Study 2: Why are the finances of Indian trade unions poor?
The Trade Unions Act, 1926, has prescribed a
minimum of INR 12 per annum for registered trade unions. Union A.5 has kept INR 16 and union B.2 INR 5 per annum as the minimum subscription fee. The membership of the unions fluctuates from year-to-year, but it never exceeded 6,000 in any year Case Study 2: Why are the finances of Indian trade unions poor?
The members of every union are reluctant to
pay subscription fee as no union is able to provide services to the satisfaction of its members. Majority of workers desired to have only one union in the factory which alone could protect their interests in a more effective manner? Questions on Case Study 2 Why are the unions in the factory not able to provide satisfactory services to their members? Is it lawful for Union A.5 to prescribe INR16
per annum as the minimum subscription fee?
Can Union B.2 fix INR 5 as the minimum
annual subscription fee?
For which union will you recommend the
adoption of the ‘check-off’ system?
SOURCES OF FINANCES OF ITU Contributions from members have been the major source of income of trade unions in the country followed by miscellaneous sources and donations. The membership fee itself has been traditionally very low. Although amendments to the Trade Unions Act during more recent years prescribing the minimum membership fees intended to raise unions’ income, in practice, these amendments did not have much impact on enhancing their income. EXPENDITURE OF ITU A major portion of the income of trade unions in the country is spent on establishments, payment of salaries and allowances to office-bearers and miscellaneous items. Expenses on the conduct of disputes, compensation to members during contingencies, legal expenses, welfare benefits and publications taken together constitute only a small fraction of total expenditure. The pattern of expenditure of Indian trade unions reveals their inability to do much for providing benefits and services to their members. Ways of improving finance of ITU The main ways by which the finances of Indian trade unions can be improved are: (i) large enrolment of members, strict and
regular collection of membership fee,
(ii) increase in membership fee and (iii) introduction of the ‘check-off’ system. Ways of improving finance of ITU Large enrolment of members and regular collection of membership fee are severely handicapped by the existence of widespread union rivalry and plurality of unions in a single plant or establishment, inability of a large number of primary unions to satisfy their members, the general apathy of the members towards the activities of their unions and absence of elements of compulsion regarding payment of membership fees. INTRODUCTION OF ‘CHECK-OFF’ SYSTEM IN TISCO JAMSHEDPUR
INTRODUCTION OF ‘CHECK-OFF’ SYSTEM IN
TISCO The historic agreement of 1956 between TISCO and Tata Workers’ Union provided for the introduction of the ‘check- off’ system. INTRODUCTION OF ‘CHECK-OFF’ SYSTEM IN TISCO JAMSHEDPUR
The agreement inter alia stated that the
company would continue to recognize the Tata Workers’ Union as the sole bargaining agent of employees at Jamshedpur in the union sphere. The company agreed in principle to a union security system and to the collection of union subscriptions through the payroll in respect of employees other than supervisory staff. INTRODUCTION OF ‘CHECK-OFF’ SYSTEM IN TISCO JAMSHEDPUR The company would be prepared to join the union in approaching the central or the state government for any alteration that might be required in law in order to permit the bringing into effect the maintenance of membership and ‘check-off’ provisions referred to above. Check-off’ system. In India, the introduction of the ‘check-off’ system appears to be the only practicable way to improve the finances of the unions. The system imposes an obligation on the employer under a
collective agreement or other device to deduct union fees and
dues from the workers’ wages and transfer the same to the union fund. Apart from ensuring a regular income for trade unions, the
system has the advantage of ascertaining the relative strength of
the unions based on continuing loyalty reflected by regular payment of union subscription and helping in the avoidance of dual membership. The second National Commission on Labour has generally recommended the adoption of the system but in the context of the determination of the representative negotiating Check-off’ system : Solution by 2nd National Commission on Labour Apart from ensuring a regular income for trade unions, the system has the advantage of ascertaining the relative strength of the unions based on continuing loyalty reflected by regular payment of union subscription and helping in the avoidance of dual membership. The second National Commission on Labour has generally recommended the adoption of the system but in the context of the determination of the representative negotiating Check-off’ system: observations and recommendations A check-off system has the advantage of ascertaining the relative strengths of trade unions based on continuing loyalty reflected by the regular payment of union subscription, even if such subscriptions are deducted from the wages as permitted under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The system, by and large, avoids the incidence of dual membership under which, for a variety of reasons, a worker may become a member of more than one union. Check-off’ system: observations and recommendations With regard to the fear of possible victimization by the management or persecution by members of other unions as a result of the introduction of the system, the commission held the view that legal rights of workers to join or not to join a union have been accepted by all concerned. The check-off system should be the general pattern, and
wherever there is legitimate apprehension that the
system may not achieve the purpose of verification or may create the possibility of victimization, it should be open to unions to petition the Labour Relations Commission to determine the method that should be adopted in a particular case. Check-off’ system: observations and recommendations The check-off system in an establishment employing 300 or more workers must be made compulsory for members of all registered trade unions. Deductions of membership fees from wages can be done only on written authorization of workers. Though the check-off system will be preferred in the case of establishments employing less than 300 persons too, the mode of identifying the negotiating agent in these establishments may be determined by the Labour Relations Commissions. QUESTIONS ON UNIT 2 Describe the factors responsible for the small size of the Indian trade unions. Explain the consequences of the small size of
trade unions in India.
Describe the sources of income of Indian
trade unions. Is their income adequate to
meet their requirements? QUESTIONS ON UNIT 2 Suggest measures to improve the finances of Indian trade unions. Describe the expenditure pattern of Indian trade unions. Will you suggest any improvement in it? What is ‘check-off’ system? Explain its merits and demerits. Explain the recommendations of the second National Commission on Labour in regard to the adoption of the ‘check-off’ system in India.