The Political Reality of

Globalization and the Open

Practice of Architecture in the
Philippines

Group 5A

Cantero Calonge Fernandez Libertad Licanda Magbanua

 Globalization refers to all those processes by which the peoples
of the world are incorporated into a single world society, global
society
 Globalization involves states that are leaner but they are also
more active, and in some areas assume greater responsibilities.
THE CONCEPT OF
GLOBALIZATION
 is an interdisciplinary concept that has not a certain
definition due to differences in views and interpretations. By
some it is considered as creating a common global culture and
homogenizing identities and life styles, while for others it may
be interpreted as highlighting differences and supporting
locality.
 Anthony Giddens describes globalization as a homogenizing
process, made possible by the differentiation of time from
space. In this way, modernization establishes a network of
global relations between near-by and distant communities
 Globalization can be thought of as a process (or set of processes) which
embodies a transformation in the spatial organization of social relations and
transactions - assessed in terms of their extensity, intensity, velocity and
impact - generating transcontinental or interregional flows, and networks of
activity, interaction, and the exercise of power
 Globalization is often associated with economic development, financial
markets and international business. In this context, the term globalization
refers to the increasingly free flow of goods, services, financial capital and
labor across national borders.
 THE IMPACT OF
GLOBALIZATION ON
ARCHITECTURE -
ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS:
HOUSING PROJECTS AND
DESIGN APPROACHES
 Media flow and technological breakthroughs such as the TV,
cinema, the internet and others are the most important factors
enabling us to interact with remote communities which may be
culturally different from our own. By such contact a common
global culture is formed.
 The spread of a global culture and lifestyles is very fast,
compared to previous times, and it emanates from an identifiable
center (Taylan 2008).
 Due to new communication technologies and media, culture has
become a commodity, produced, offered and marketed, and so it
has become an image. The world is becoming a single social
space held together by the cultural transportation of semantic
systems and symbolic forms (Hannerz 1998).
 ―the common culture created is the culture of those dominating
this market‖.
GLOBALIZATION
FORCES IN
ARCHITECTURE
 Cities and regions are facing great challenges as a consequence
of globalization.
 One force seeks to safeguard and promulgate established
indigenous architectural traditions, forms, decorative motifs,
and technologies. It advocates historical continuity, cultural
diversity, and preservation of identity, all symbolized by a
particular architectural vocabulary, just as spoken languages
and local dialects impart identity.
Trends

 Today, pressure to globalize architecture primarily springs

from
 Two sources to Globalize Architecture:
 1. the culture of commerce and
 2. the culture of design.
The Global Culture of
Commerce

 is driven by changing consumer expectations, market

opportunities, and business agendas. Their architectural
manifestations include iconic, sky-scraping banking towers,
chains of standardized hotels, franchise restaurants, and
shopping malls full of all-too-familiar name-brand stores.
The Global Culture of Design

 is supported by architects who study what other architects are

creating, no matter where. With fabulous photographs in slick
magazines and professional journals, trend-conscious
designers can scan and span the globe, sharing high-style
concepts rendered in stylish materials. Glass, aluminum,
stainless steel, copper, titanium, and natural stone are readily
available. If they cannot be acquired locally, they can be
imported.
Technology
 Globalization is now an unstoppable historical process led by
technological change and involving the dissemination of
science and new technologies. Rapid urbanization has only
been made possible by the introduction of modern technology
as a part of the development process.
 In one of the oldest treatises on architecture, Vitruvius
proposed three essential requirements for all good
architecture: firmitas, utilitas, and venustas.
 Complex construction and advanced building design require a
mastery of structures and construction technology, and as
 Michelle Addington (2006:64) mentions, “Technology is often
considered the handmaiden of design and, as such, is meant to
be subordinate: design is the why and the what, whereas
technology is the how-to.”
 NEW TECHNOLOGIES ARE CHANGING THE NATURE
OF WORK — WITH ITS MULTIDIMENSIONAL
EFFECTS —
 by creating new forms of leisure,
 - including the hyper-reality of cyberspace,
 - new virtual realities, and
 - new modes of information and
 - entertainment.
 Dramatic change and innovation have been part of modernity for
centuries, as has technological development and expansion.
 A new global culture is emerging as a result of computer and
communications technologies.
 Transitional forms of architecture are traversing national
boundaries and becoming part of a new world culture.
 The new wave of technologies in electronics, robotics,
telecommunications, new materials, and biotechnology has given
rise to a new technology paradigm that accentuates the role of the
world cities (Lo and Yeung, 1998).
 Thus, the adoption of appropriate technologies is a natural
and unforced consequence of appropriate architecture.
Together, they offer valid forms and images to take the place
of models offered by industrialized nations, and as Shahin
Vassigh (2004:112) mentions,
 “The practice of architecture is a delicate balance of art and
science — a creative endeavor which also requires that the
architect master a broad array of technical skills, including
engineering.”
THE OPEN PRACTICE
OF ARCHITECTURE
IN THE PHILIPPINES
"General Practice of Architecture" means
 the act of
 - planning and architectural designing,
 - structural conceptualization,
 - specifying, supervising and
 - giving general administration and responsible direction to the
erection, enlargement or alterations of buildings and building
environments and architectural design in engineering structures or
any part thereof;
 The scientific, aesthetic and orderly coordination of all the
processes which enter into the production of a complete building
or structure performed through the medium of unbiased
preliminary studies
Medium of Unbiased Preliminary
Studies of

 plans,
 consultations,
 specifications,
 conferences,
 evaluations,
 investigations,
 contract documents and
 oral advice and directions
 regardless of whether the persons engaged in such practice are
residents of the Philippines or have their principal office or place
of business in this country or another territory, and regardless of
whether such persons are performing one or all these duties, or
whether such duties are performed in person or as the directing
head of an office or organization performing them;
 "Scope of the Practice of Architecture" encompasses the
provision of professional services in connection with site,
physical and planning and the design, construction, enlargement,
conservation, renovation, remodeling, restoration or alteration of
a building or group of buildings.
 Services may include, but are not limited to:
 (a) Planning, architectural designing and structural conceptualization;
 (b) consultation, consultancy, giving oral or written advice and
directions, conferences, evaluations, investigations, quality surveys,
appraisals and adjustments, architectural and operational planning, site
analysis and other pre-design services;
 (c) schematic design, design development, contract documents and
construction phases including professional consultancies;
 (d) preparation of preliminary, technical, economic and financial
feasibility studies of plans, models and project promotional services;
 (e) preparation of architectural plans, specifications, bill of materials,
cost estimates, general conditions and bidding documents;
 (f) construction and project management, giving general
management, administration, supervision, coordination and
responsible direction or the planning, architectural designing,
construction, reconstruction, erection, enlargement or demolition,
renovation, repair, orderly removal, remodeling, alteration,
preservation or restoration of buildings or structures or complex
buildings, including all their components, sites and environs, intended
for private or public use;
 (g) the planning, architectural lay-outing and utilization of spaces
within and surrounding such buildings or structures, housing design
and community architecture, architectural interiors and space
planning, architectural detailing, architectural lighting, acoustics,
architectural lay-outing of mechanical, electrical, electronic, sanitary,
plumbing, communications and other utility systems, equipment and
fixtures;
 (h) building programming, building administration, construction
arbitration and architectural conservation and restoration;
 (i) all works which relate to the scientific, aesthetic and orderly
coordination of all works and branches of the work, systems and
processes necessary for the production of a complete building or
structure, whether for public or private use, in order to enhance
and safeguard life, health and property and the promotion and
enrichment of the quality of life, the architectural design of
engineering structures or any part thereof; and
 (j) all other works, projects and activities which require the
professional competence of an architect, including teaching of
architectural subjects and architectural computer-aided design
 ISSUES OF THE
PRACTICES IN THE
GLOBAL CONTEXT
 The practice of these professions here is threatened to extinction by the
continued bias of clients against them, the threat of illegal Filipino
practitioners, the invasion of foreign consultants and the exodus of
Filipino designers to better-paying jobs overseas.
 The bias against local practitioner s apparently stems from the public’s
misunderstanding of what architects and related design professionals do. 
 Architecture is the art and science of designing buildings and building
complexes to house and support the functions of clients and the public.
 As a service, it is like medicine and law where problems or needs are
addressed in a timely and direct manner but with the additional facet of
elegance, aesthetics and good taste.
 Many Filipino architects are treated like suppliers or contractors,
valued only if fees charged are cheap and if they are willing to be
constantly on call (unlike doctors or lawyers, clients refuse to pay
architects based on time spent at endless meetings).
 It’s a matter of respect, which makes it all the more aggravating
for many locals practitioners as they witness a whole different
attitude given by clients to foreign-schooled but unregistered or
licensed practitioners or foreign consultants.
 Of late, a number of Filipino or Fil-American designers schooled
or who have worked overseas have set up practices without the
necessary licenses.
 Their success has been the product of good marketing skills,
individual packaging (foreign accents, fashionable dress sense,
and conspicuous attendance in the cocktail circuit) as well as a
competent portfolio of work overseas. It is no wonder then that
local media find these personalities good copy.
 Nevertheless they have been found not to be in the roster of
registered or licensed architects. The United Architects of the
Philippines (UAP) has sent notices to editors in chief and writers
of design magazines and broadsheets to desist from referring to
these designers as “architects.”
  Similar incidents have been cited by the Philippine Association
of Landscape Architects and the Philippine Institute of Interior
Designers regarding personalities featured in newspapers and
magazines and referred to as landscape architects or interior
designers. All three professions are regulated by the government
and require registration and licenses to practice.
 On a show, architect Alli explained that the Architecture Law
RA9266 (there are similar ones for landscape architecture,
interior design and environmental planning)protects the interest
of the public and ensures legal accountability for malpractice or
its results—collapsing buildings, landslides in housing sites,
exploding utilities and the like.
 More worrying for the UAP, PALA and PIID is the proliferation
of foreign designers who are featured in numerous press releases
and ads by real estate developers—complete with portraits and
interviews as to how they have designed this or that new master
planned community, world-class complexes or trend-setting
landscapes and urban design.
 The situation with architecture is a bit different but malpractice in
the art and science of designing buildings could lead, like bad
medicine or lawyering, to loss of life or a sad existence in a
structure that looks and feels like a prison.
 Filipino architects are considered world-class in every country
except their own. Like many in other design professions they are
driven overseas because they are unappreciated and underpaid yet
they possess the technical expertise and capacity that could create
all that public and private clients are planning to build in support
of a booming economy without there course of foreign
consultants. 
 Architecture is a proud profession. Its practitioners have to be
respected for them to be able to produce structures and settings
that engender pride of place and a national identity. Philippine
architecture is best created by Filipinos for Filipinos. If we aspire
instead to live in simulations of other lands and cultures,
then globalization will have shown its ugliest façade, an illusion
of modernity that hides behind it a poverty of culture and purpose
we can never escape from.
APEC Architects
Manual
OVERVIEW

 An APEC Architect is a person who is registered, licensed or

otherwise professionally recognized as an architect in a
participating economy, and whose name is enrolled on a section
of the APEC Architect Register maintained by that economy.
 The criteria adopted by the Central Council for admission to the
APEC Architect Register, and use of the description ‘APEC
Architect’, are based on identification of a common sequence and
elements in the education, training and assessment of architects as
qualified to provide professional architectural services in the
home economy. These consist of:
 an accreditation or recognition procedure for education programs
in architecture;
 a minimum period of post-graduate practical experience, with
specified requisites;
 fulfillment of registration, licensing or other requirements for full
professional recognition,
 a minimum period of professional practice as a registered or
licensed architect, with
 specified requisites.
 Architects deemed by the Central Council to fulfil these
requirements are eligible for registration as an APEC Architect.
To retain their registration, APEC Architects must comply with
obligations imposed by their home economies for maintaining
professional competence and observing codes of professional
conduct. Host economies may choose to impose special
requirements for the recognition of APEC Architects for practice
in their economies, but any such requirements must be fully
transparent.
Monitoring Committees

 Each participating economy is required to establish a Monitoring

Committee to take responsibility for administration of the APEC
Architect framework in that economy, after receiving
authorization by the Central Council to do so. Monitoring
Committees act with delegated authority from the Central
Council to implement its policies and carry out it duties.
 The primary duty of a Monitoring Committee is to operate a
section of the APEC Architect Register for the enrolment of
APEC Architects registered/licensed in that economy.
Authorization of Monitoring
Committees
 Newly formed Monitoring Committees wishing to establish a
section of the APEC Architect Register must first be authorized
by the Central Council to do so. Applications for authorization
must be accompanied by information on the professional
recognition/ accreditation systems in place in the economy and
details of its proposals for assessment of APEC Architect criteria,
and any other information the Council deems necessary.
Central Council

 The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for all matters

relating to the APEC Architect framework. The Council
comprises at least one representative appointed by the Monitoring
Committee of each economy authorized to operate a section of
the Register. Non-authorized economies may also be invited to
attend Council meetings as non-voting observers.
 The Central Council’s primary duty is to decide the standards and
criteria required for registration as an APEC Architect and to
establish operational procedures for management of the APEC
Architect Register.
Administrative Provisions

 Responsibility for providing administrative services for the APEC

Architect Central Council and acting as the project Secretariat is
undertaken in rotation by participating economies. The economy
performing this role at any time may share its duties with other
economies or it may be exempted from them on request.
 During its term of office, the Secretariat is required to administer
all Council business, manage its meetings and coordinate the
activities of the independent Monitoring Committees. It acts as a
centre of information for the project and maintains the APEC
Architect website.
Termination

 The APEC Architect Central Council will operate for so long as it

is acceptable and desirable to participating economies.
REGISTRATION AS
AN APEC ARCHITECT
APEC ARCHITECT
REGISTRATION CRITERIA
 The following set of principles satisfies Central Council criteria
for admission to the APEC Architect Register and the right to use
the description ‘APEC Architect’.
 1. Architectural Education
 Educational Benchmark Statement
 Education as an architect shall comprise at least four years of full time study. The
education
 must be of university level, with architecture the principal component.
 Common Elements of Architectural Education Programs
 The core subject areas in an accredited/recognized program of
architectural education are:
 Design, as the predominant subject category
 Technology and Environmental Science
 Social, Cultural & Environmental Studies, and
 Professional Studies.
Other subject areas within architectural
 educational programs may include:
 Related Studies
 General Education
Accreditation / Recognition
Procedure for Educational
Programs in Architecture
 Processes incorporating the following principles of good
governance will satisfy the accreditation/recognition criteria for
educational programs for an APEC Architect.

 1. Fulfilment of Period of Pre-registration or Pre-licensing

Experience for Recognition as an Architect in a Home
Economy
 2. Fulfilment of Registration / Licensing Requirements for
Recognition as an Architect in a
 Home Economy
 3. Professional Practice as a Registered / Licensed Architect
ENTITLEMENT TO
REGISTRATION
 1.Admission to the APEC Architect Register
APEC Architects must also agree to be bound by the code of
professional conduct of their home economy and of any
jurisdiction in which they practice.

Particulars of APEC Architects to be recorded on the Register

include:
 name and business address;
 home economy or jurisdiction in which the architect is
registered/licensed; and
 any other economy in which the architect is registered/licensed.
 2.Maintaining APEC Architect Registration
 APEC Architect registration is to be renewed on payment of an
administration fee to a Monitoring Committee at intervals no greater
than two years. Registration details are to be reviewed and renewed
on application to practice in a host economy.
 Renewal of registration is subject to compliance with home economy
regulatory authority or Monitoring Committee requirements to
undertake programs of continuing professional development, or fulfil
other tests of current competence.
 The registration of an APEC Architect will be cancelled if the
architect ceases to be registered/licensed in the designated home
economy. The registration of APEC Architects found, subject to due
process, to be in breach of the code of professional conduct of either
their home economy, or a host economy, may be suspended by their
home economy Monitoring Committee.
THE COMPETENCE OF AN
APEC ARCHITECT
The skills and knowledge required for admission to the APEC
Architect Register
 An APEC Architect must be competent to create
architectural designs.
 An APEC Architect must be competent to translate a design
concept into built form.
 An APEC Architect must be competent in the practice of
architecture.
THE APEC
ARCHITECT
REGISTER
APEC Architect Register

 The APEC Architect Register is the means by which the names of

architects who have achieved common standards of professional
competence are made publicly available.
 To ensure that the information it contains is accurate and current,
the APEC Architect Register is divided into independent sections
established in each participating economy for the enrolment of
architects who are registered/licensed in that economy. It consists
of a series of decentralized, linked electronic databases,
constructed and operated by the Monitoring Committee of each
economy. The Monitoring Committee is responsible for
maintaining and regularly updating the section of the Register it
administers.
 The participating economy acting as Secretariat maintains the
central APEC Architect domain with hyperlinks to the individual
APEC Architect database websites. Each website contains an
introductory statement on the APEC Architect framework,
information on APEC Architect registration requirements, access
to the list of APEC Architects registered in its economy, and to
relevant publications and forms for down-loading.
 Monitoring Committees publish on their websites any special
requirements that the home economy places on APEC Architects
from other economies.
The Reciprocal Recognition
Framework
 The Central Council has established a Reciprocal Recognition
Framework which identifies participating economies that have
adopted the same registration / certification requirements for
APEC Architects from foreign economies, thereby establishing a
reciprocal basis for the professional recognition of APEC
Architects from those economies.
 In assessing APEC Architects from economies with more
restrictive categories of requirements, host economies may
impose similar requirements to those of the applicant’s economy.
MONITORING
COMMITTEES
Composition

 Whilst the composition of Monitoring Committees is a matter for

each economy to decide, the size and balance of its membership
will be dictated by the functions it must perform, particularly
with regard to evaluation of the qualifications and professional
experience of candidates applying for admission to the section of
the APEC Architect Register it maintains.
Functions

 Monitoring Committees, when authorized, carry out the

following functions and manage the section of the APEC
Architect Register, with delegated authority of the Central
Council, for which they are responsible, in accordance with
Central Council policy, guidelines and rules of procedure.
 Constituent Bodies of the Central Council
 Maintaining Standards
 APEC Architect Register
 Information and Communication
 Assessment of Candidates for Registration
AUTHORISATION OF
MONITORING COMMITTEES
 An APEC economy seeking to operate a section of the APEC
Architect Register must first constitute a Monitoring Committee
to submit an application to the APEC Architect Central Council,
through the Secretariat, for authorization to do so.

 (Note: In economies with multiple domestic jurisdictions, where

applicable, the professional standards and criteria established by
national organizations acting as councils of individual regulatory
authorities are those to be evaluated for the authorization of
Monitoring Committees.)
Application for Authorization

 To promote consistency and transparency of process, the Central

Council has prepared guidelines on the information to be
provided by Monitoring Committees in support of their
applications for authorization to show conformance with APEC
Architect criteria. It will require advice on:
 education and practical experience/training requirements for
registration/licensure as an architect in that economy;
 the accreditation/ recognition procedures employed to assess them;
 procedures adopted to assess compliance with the required
professional practice experience as a registered/licensed architect.
Continued Authorization

 Authorized Monitoring Committees, and the procedures they adopt,

are subject to periodic review by the Central Council to ensure that
they continue to comply with agreed standards. They must
immediately notify the Central Council of any material changes in
education provision, accreditation/recognition systems and
registration/licensure requirements to those which were approved for
initial authorization, or of any other significant developments
concerning the professional recognition of architects in their
economies that might conflict with Council policy.
 A Monitoring Committee whose authorization has been suspended by
the Central Council because it no longer conforms with APEC
Architect criteria may, with reason, request an independent review of
the decision.
THE APEC ARCHITECT
CENTRAL COUNCIL
 Constitution of the Central
Council
 The Central Council acts as the joint governing body for the APEC
Architect framework and is composed of at least one representative from
the Monitoring Committee of each economy authorized to operate a
section of the Register. There is no limit to the number of members
appointed to the Council by Monitoring Committees but each authorized
economy is entitled to only one vote.
 To promote the project and extend its benefits, economies that have not
yet received authorization to maintain a section of the APEC Architect
Register are also invited by the Council to appoint representatives to
attend its meetings as non-voting observers. Although observers are not
entitled to take part in the decision making process, this provides an
opportunity for them to familiarize themselves with the APEC Architect
framework with a view to establishing a Monitoring Committee in their
own economy.
Duties of the Central Council

 The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for the operation

of each aspect of the APEC Architect framework. Its duties
include the following:
 Maintenance of the APEC Architect Register:
 Establishment of Monitoring Committees:
 Oversight of the Reciprocal Recognition Framework
 Administration of the APEC Architect Project
Standards and Criteria for
Registration as an APEC Architect
 The purpose of the APEC Architect Register is to establish
authoritative and reliable evidence of the achievement of common
standards of professional competence by the architects enrolled on it.
Registration is reserved for experienced practitioners to provide an
additional level of assurance to consumers.
 The criteria adopted for registration as an APEC Architect are based
on a dynamic set of principles that identify common elements of
professional recognition in APEC economies and reflect current
practice norms. These standards and criteria are incorporated in
Council guidelines periodically reviewed by the Central Council to
ensure that they remain relevant to international best practice within
the profession.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ARRANGEMENTS –
THE SECRETARIAT
 To provide an equitable system for sharing the provision of
administrative services among economies, Central Council
business is conducted by participating economies, which take on
the role of Secretariat on a rotational basis. The minimum period
for economies to act in this capacity is two years and they may
reapply to continue for a subsequent term of office.
Mechanism, Documents and Procedures to Hand
Over The Secretariat To Following
Economy

 The Following procedures must be complied whenever there

is a change of Economy to act as Secretariat for the Central
Council in order to have continuity on the administrative
duties and responsibilities.
MECHANISM AND
PROCEDURE
 Establishment of a meeting date and venue between outgoing and
incoming Secretariats.
 The meeting to take place where documents and information is
handed out
 To have a written document to be signed by both Secretariats stating
information handed over and received, with official date for
incoming Secretariat.
 An official communication should be sent to organizations APEC
Architect has contact with,
 By outgoing Secretariat announcing the handover of Secretariat with
 presentation of Economy to act as new Secretariat as well as its officials.
 By incoming Secretariat, with contact information.
 An official communication should be sent to APEC Secretariat and
Lead Shepherd of HRDWG by Both Secretariats as above.
APEC ARCHITECTS
IN THE
PHILIPPINES
 As of July 1, 2017, there are 54 Filipino architects that are
registered as an APEC Architect. They are:
ARCHITECT YOLANDA D. ARCHITECT PROSPERIDAD
REYES C. LUIS
ARCHITECT EUGENE G. ARCHITECT EDILBERTO F.
GAN FLORENTINO
ARCHITECT FROILAN L. ARCHITECT PHILIP H.
HONG RECTO
ARCHITECT EDRIC MARCO ARCHITECT ROMULO L.
C. FLORENTINO REYES
ARCHITECT MIGUEL C. ARCHITECT ANA S.
GUERRERO III MANGALINO-LING
ARCHITECT JOSE SIAO ARCHITECT MICHAEL T.
LING ANG
ARCHITECT CESAR V. ARCHITECT MANUEL T.
CANCHELA MAÑOSA JR.
ARCHITECT ANGEL ARCHITECT FRANCISCO T.
LAZARO JR. MAÑOSA
ARCHITECT GERONIMO V. ARCHITECT REMUS P.
MANAHAN ANCHETA
ARCHITECT JOSE MARI A. ARCHITECT JONATHAN O.
CAÑIZARES GAN
ARCHITECT DANIEL C. GO ARCHITECT NESTOR S.
MANGIO
ARCHITECT ROLANDO D.L. ARCHITECT WELLINGTON
MIRANDA P. ONG
ARCHITECT EDWARD C. ARCHITECT TEOFILO I.
TAN VASQUEZ
ARCHITECT ARMANDO N. ARCHITECT FELINO A.
ALLI PALAFOX JR.
ARCHITECT FLORDELIZA S. ARCHITECT SEVERINO P.
LAPERAL PEREZ
ARCHITECT ANGELINE T. ARCHITECT NORBERTO M.
CHUA-CHIACO NUKE
ARCHITECT ERNESTO ARCHITECT GUILLERMO H.
ANTONINO D. NASOL HISANCHA
ARCHITECT DANILO M. ARCHITECT ERIBERTO V.
FUENTEBELLA AGUIRRE
ARCHITECT EDGAR S. ARCHITECT KA KUEN T.
CALMA CHUA
ARCHITECT CARLOS F. ARCHITECT ROMMEL A.
LACUNA AGULTO
ARCHITECT MA. NINA ARCHITECT MARIANO S.
BAILON-ARCE ARCE JR.
ARCHITECT ROLANDO L. ARCHITECT MICHAEL G. DE
CORDERO CASTRO
ARCHITECT FILNA DAPHNE ARCHITECT OMAR
P. ESPINA MAXWELL P. ESPINA
ARCHITECT JOSEPH ARCHITECT ANNETTE F.
MICHAEL P. ESPINA GADDI-LIGANOR
ARCHITECT ROBERT M. ARCHITECT MA. LOURDES
MIRAFUENTE M. ONOZAWA
ARCHITECT BENJAMIN K. ARCHITECT RUNDDY D.
PANGANIBAN JR. RAMILO
ARCHITECT JAIME G. SILVA ARCHITECT ABELARDO M.
TOLENTINO JR.