Associate Professor DSNLU Introduction •Manu Smriti •Sources of DHARMA - Vedas, Smritis, Sadacharas, Good Conscience • Yajnyavalkya says - “Sruthi,Smriti, Sadachara, Swasyacha Priyamatmanam Samyak sankalpajah kamo dharmamulam edam smrutham.” • Main sources of Hindu law 1. Srutis Rig Veda - . Fountain-head of Hindu religion - It contains 1028 Hymns .Divided into Ten Groups Yajurveda - Sacrificies . Part of hymns from Rig veda Passages from prose. Explanations and directions to the Priests. Hymns of Rig Ved as to marriage are used to this day. Sam Veda -. Chanting Vedas . Some of the Hymns of Rig Veda. Meant for particular sacrifices in which the juice of SOMA plant ( believed to the drink of the Gods was principle offering Soma botanical name Sarcostemma Vimanalis • Aharvana Veda • Priests by name Atharvanas compiled Magical powers and evil powers • Vedas do not contain legal rules • But vedas contain • Marriage, types of sons, adoption partition inheritance and stridhana • Tattirya Samhita of Black Yajur Makes a Mention of Manu Equal distribution among sons • That is Vedic passage invoked equal distribution of ancestral property among sons because women as destitute of strength . Post Vedic Period : Vedangas : Appendices to the Vedas came into existence a. Siksha, b. Kalpa- Dealing with rituals, c. Vyakarana (Grammar), d. Chandas or Prosody e. Jyotish or Astronomy, f. Niruktha or Lexicon Upanishads Upanishads are nothing but vedanta that is concluding portion of Vedas and embody the highest principles of Hindu religion and philosophy. 2. Smritis ( what was remembered) Next to Vedas a) Manu smriti (200 B C) Oldest one contins 2694 slokas It deals with debts, pledges, sales, deposits, partnership, gifts wages ,agreements, boundary disputes , master and servant, husband and wife, partition and inheritance, betting and gambling, assault, defamation, theft, robbery and adultery b) Yagnavalkya smriti ( 2nd century A D) 1010 Slokas It is divided in to 1) Achara (Ritual) Marriage) , 2) Vyahara ( Secular) Courts, procedure, Ordeals, Debts, Pledges and partition Kinds of sons, Sales, defamation, assault, theft and adultery Prayaschitta ( Expiation) . • 3) Prayaschitta ( Expiation) • Importance of Yajnavalkya Smriti • It is due to Commentary by Vignaneswara • Next Smriti and Brihaspati deals with legal subjects • Narada Smriti 4th Century 3. Commentaries and Digests A code of Hindu law in Sanskrit was prepared by 10 learned pandits under stewardship Warren Hastings By Vivada Arnava Sethu ( Bridge over the Ocean of Litigation) 1773- 1775 English Version By Halheid Known as Halheid’s Gentoo code Later Under Lord Cornwallis by Sir William Jones the then Judge of Calcutta S.C, Translation of Hindu sacred laws by Manu Under the same guidance in 1794 Jagannadha Tharka Panchanana Prepared a digest of Smriti By name Vivada Bhangarnava (Ocean of solved legal problems British judges were assisted by native pandits who gave their opinions on the dharma shastras applicable to hindus This was abolished in1964 as the English judges felt that they could administer the native laws without their assistance • 4. Custom as a source • a) Importance : • Acharaha Paramodharmaha • Yagnavalkya: • A practice which a person practices whether it is dharma or not, because it is the usage of the country • He also says that a person should not practice even ordained by the Smriti, if it is opposed to custom • P C Recognised the importance of the custom in Ramnad Case 12 M I A, 397 • Here the question was whether in the dravida country a widow could adopt even in the absence of express authority from her husband • Examples of customary practice with the authority of the deceased husband’s sapindas a valid adoption could be made by the widow were given • Vasishta • a woman should not adopt except with her husband’s permission. • P C : It was not open to the Judges to embark upon an independent enquiry in to the meaning of the Dharma Sastra Text. It should be interpreted only in the light of the Actual practice • Sir James Colville • Under the Hindu system of law clear proof of usage will outweigh the written text of the law • Types of custom • Local Custom Ramnad Case • Marriage with sister’s daughter • relaxed in certain extent in south • Family Custom • A custom may govern only in one particular family Certain Zamindaries devolution and marriages • Caste custom • Adoption in Brahmins and Sudras • Essentials • 1) Antiquity • Case Ramalakshmi vs. Sovanatha.14 M I A.585 • claim of Zamindari by two sons by different wives • One claim basing on that he was born earlier • Other on that his mother was married earlier than the mother of the rival claimant • Question • Here whether to consider priority in birth of sons or to the marriage of the mother was to govern succession • Examination of statements of several Zamindas and it was not sufficient to prove the custom in that area • General custom of the first-born son taking the impartiable estate of Raja was given effect to, as the family custom of devolution upon the eldest son of the senior most Rani was not proved • 2) Certainity; • when the evidence is conflicting, a uniform custom is not to be established • 3 ) Reasonableness • Unreasonable customs which are opposed to public policy are rejected by courts • Ex Polyandry allowing a woman to re-marry during the life-time of her husband was held to be immoral • Allowing dancing girls to adopt daughters for bringing them as prostitutes are immoral 4. Not forbidden by any express provision of law. it is not only of statutory law but also of the mandatory texts of Dharmasastras. • 5. Discontinuance • Customs which are applicable to only to a particular families may be discontinued • Case Abram Vs Abraham • • 5 Judicial decisions • English Judges who administered the Hindu Law with the help of Pandits had brought to bear their own nations for the development of Hindu law. • Their ignorance of Sanskrit, had the effect of imparting rigidity • For the sake of justice, logic or harmony the effect of original texts had been either altered or modified by the judges in their judicial pronouncements. They constitute an important source of law • This resulted in large number of decisions piled up on almost every point of law and they superseded the law laid down in commentaries • Number of decisions so far piled up on almost every point of law have superseded the law laid down in commentaries. • In some cases the decisions of Pc in Hindu law are still binding Precedents, where there is no decision of the S C • 6. Legislations • It is a modern source • Prior to British Period • Hindu law was scattered . Different parts of the country followed different rules . It was difficult to find fixed rules of several areas • P C decisions in Hindu law where the supreme court has given its pronouncements are taken to be still binding. • A precedent is not merely an evidence of law but also a source of law. Courts are bound to follow it. • Ex: Law relating to adoption, • pious duty of the son to pay the father’s debts to the extent of ancestral assets in hand, • extension of such duty even during father’s life time • 7. Legislation • It is a modern source Most of them are in the form of reformation • During British period • hindu law was scattered in different part of the country and there were different rules of practices. It was difficult to find fixed principles of law on several points. • Ex • Caste Disabilities Removal Act, 1850 • Hindu widows Remarriage Act, 1856 • Special Marriage Act 1872 Repealed by 1954 • Indian Majority Act 1875 T. P >Act 1882 Guardian and Wards Act 1890 • Indian Succesion Act 1925 • Inheritance (Removal of Disabilities)Act, 1928 • Hindu Law of Inheritance ( Amendment) Act 1919 • Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929 (Sharada Act • Hindu Gains of Learning Act 1930 • Hindu Women’s Right to property Act, 1937 • H.M Act 1955, H M & Guardiaship Act1956 • H S Act 1956 H A M Act, 1956 • Child Marriage Restraint ( Amendment ) Act1978 • Marriage Laws ( Amendment) Act, 1976 • H S ( Amendment) Act 2005 • 8) Equity Justice and good conscience • Here equity means the principles emerging in the course of administration of justice, where on account of inadequacy of law the judges evolve certain general principles on the basis of just ness, fairness and propriety • S c in Gurunadh Vs Kamala Bai 1951 has recognised this principle that in the absence of any rule of Hindu Law , the courts have authority to decide the cases on this principles Unless in doing so decision would be repugnant to or inconsistant with any theory of Hindu Law.