You are on page 1of 15

Tradition of Excellenc

DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE
DEVELOPMENT IN 3-6 YEARS OLD
CHILDREN WHO ARE UNDERING
EARLY CHILD EDUCATION AND NOT IN
PANTI VILLAGE, PANTI DISTRICT
By:

Stefanie Hapy Lisabella


NIM 172310101173
Class A
Background Development child age early is a foundation for child
to undergo his life in period that will come Tradition of Excellenc

. Education Child Age Early (PAUD) could made into


wrong one method that could support development
child

Parents who are still hesitant about sending their


children to PAUD

Follow early childhood education programs Not attending early childhood education

Is tget difference cognitive development of


children?
Formulation of the problem Special purpose Tradition of Excellenc
 Identify difference development ability cognitive Among
Is there a difference in cognitive development on child that take Education Child Age Early (PAUD) with that
child age 3-6 year that undergo Education Child
not.
Age Early and not in Village House districts  To knowing level development cognitive child that take and
House ?
don't take Education Child Age Early (PAUD).

General purpose Benefits of Research


Research this aim at to knowing existence The results of this study are expected to be additional
relationship Among Education Child Age knowledge and knowledge about the level of cognitive
Early (PAUD) with development cognitive development of preschool children who attend PAUD and
child age preschool (3-6 year). not, so that parents can find out the factors that support
cognitive development in children.
Authenticity Research
Tradition of Excellenc
Review References
Tradition of Excellenc

Cognitive development PAUD

- Definition PAUD is a something effort coaching


- Child development stage that aimed at to child that done through
- Factor influencing child development giving stimulation education to help
- Impaired cognitive development of growth and development physical and
children spiritual

Metode learning:
method tell a story, method chatted,
method asked answer, method music,
method study tours, and method
demonstration
Theory Framework
Tradition of Excellenc
Conceptual framework
Tradition of Excellenc

Research Hypothesis
The relationship between variables in this study Tget differences in cognitive development
is an asymmetrical relationship in which the between children undergoing Early Childhood
independent variable (free) affects the Education and not in the Panti Kecamatan Village
dependent variable (bound). House
Tradition of Excellenc

Research Design

Design Research Data Retrieval


Technique
In this study the authors used
In this study the authors used the
approach comparative quantitative a cross-sectional data
collection technique
Population and Sample Research
Tradition of Excellenc
Population

The population used as the object in


this study were all children aged 3-6
years who live in Panti Village,
District House. Criteria Exclusion Inclusion Criteria

Technique Sampling Sample

The technique used in taking research The sample taken from the population
samples using methods Purposive must be truly representative (represent),
sampling. therefore we have criteria inclusion. It is
estimated that the population of this study
is more than 100 people.
Tradition of Excellenc

Research sites Time Research

• This research will be carried


• The plan where this research
will be carried out in out from the date of the
Orphanage village, Panti issuance of the research
sub-district, districts Jember, permit with a target time of
East Java. completion of approximately
6 (six) months, which
consists of the data
collection process, data
processing, to the guidance
process..
Operational definition
Variable Operational definition Indicator Measuring Scale Score
instrument Tradition of Excellenc
Variable independent : Upaya coaching aimed at children Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Nominal -
Education Child Age from 0-6 years old which is carried out Republic of Indonesia Number Government
Early (PAUD) through the provision of educational 27 of 1990 concerning Regulation Number
stimuli to assist physical and spiritual Preschool Education from 27 of 1990 regarding
growth and development. Chapter I Article 1 concerning Preschool Education
General Provisions to Chapter
VIII Article 14 concerning
Educational Personnel.
Dependent variable: Cognitive development explains how Primary scale (3-6 years) Wechsler Preschool Ordinal Very Superior (> 130),
Cognitive Development children adapt and interpret objects VCI has Vocabulary And Primary Skill of Superior (120–129),
from the events around them. How do and Information Intelligence-Fourth High Average (110–
children learn the characteristics and Receptive indicators. Edition (WPPSI-IV) 119), Average (90–
functions of objects such as toys, VSI has Block Design Questionnaire 109), Low Average
furniture and food, as well as social and Object Assembly (80–89), Borderline
objects such as themselves, parents, indicators. Meanwhile, (70–79), Extremely
and friends. WMI has Picture Low (<69) .
Memory and Zoo
Lotions indicators.
Data collection
Tradition of Excellenc

• In this study, the data were collected using instruments pengukuran Wechsler
Preschool And Primary Skill of Intelligence-Fourth Edition (WPPSI-IV)
• Scoring and appraisal done with add up score on respectively - respectively
subtest. After that, done change from Raw Score Becomes Scaled Score on
respectively - respectively subtest. After that, Scaled Score on verbal subtest
on add up, so also Scale Score on subtest performance. Both will produce
respectively - respectively Verbal Score, Performance Score, and Total Score.
• category corresponding with category IQ from David Wechsler, that is; Very
Superior (> 130), Superior (120–129), High Average (110–119), Average (90–
109), Low Average (80–89), Borderline (70–79), Extremely Low (<69) .
Tradition of Excellenc

Data processing Data analysis


Bivariate
Coding • non-parametric by reason of the type of data
analyzed in the scale ordinal
• This research uses test normality, with samples in
Data entry this study it was estimated that more than 100
people, then used Kolmogrov-Smirnov.
• the bivariate analysis test inUse is test Mann-
Cleaning Whitney if distribution frequency research not
normal. If normal then me will use test T not in
pairs.
Tradition of Excellenc
Research Ethics

Approval Confidentiality

Anonymity
REFERENCES Tradition of Excellenc
Ariyanti, Tatik. 2016.Importance Education Child Age Early For Grow Flower. Journal Dynamics Education Basic. Vol 8 (1): 50-58.
Egeten, Eka Christina., AY Ismanto, W. Silolonga. 2017.Relationship Education Child Age Early (PAUD) with Development Cognitive Child Age
Preschool in Village Pakuweru districts Tenga districts Minahasa South. E-Jornal Nursing. Vol 5 (2): 1-7.
Fitri, Heleni., Khudri A. Sembiring. 2018.Development Cognitive Child Age 5-6 year in Review from level Education mother in PAUD Love mother
districts Tassel. Journal Education Child Age Early. Vol 1 (2): 169-178.
Blue, Nizar Wise and Rahmadi, FA 2016. Relationship Development Ability Cognitive Adaptive with Education Child Age Early (PAUD) Non-
formal. Journal Medical Diponegoro. Vol. 5 (4): 1354-1363.
Margono. 2010.Methodology Research Education. Jakarta: Rineka Create.
Nursalam. (2017).Methodology Research Science Nursing. Edition. 4. Jakarta:Celemba Medika.
Ridho, R., Markhamah, Darsinah. 2015.Management Learning Education Child Age Early (PAUD) in KB "Intelligent" districts Sukorejo districts
Kendal. Journal Research Humanities. Vol. 16 (2): 56-69.Riskesdas (2017) Survey Demographics and Health Indonesia. Jakarta:Riskesdas.
Seville, Consuelo G. et. al. 2007.Research Methods. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company.
Sugiarto et al. 2001.Technique Sampling. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia References Main.
Sugiyono. 2013.Method Research Education Approach Quantitative, Qualitative, andR&D. Bandung:Alfabeta
Syeda, M., Climie, EA 2014. Test Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition. Journal of Psychoeucational
Assessment. Vol. 32 (3): 265-267.

You might also like