BIORISK MANAGEMENT AND THE AMP MODEL Biorisk – is the risk associated to biological toxins or infectious agents. Biorisk management – is the integration of biosafety and biosecurity to manage risks when working with biological toxins and infectious agents. According to the CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA) 15793:2011, Biorisk Management (BRM) is “a system or process to control safety or security risks associated with the handling or storage and disposal of biological agents and toxins in laboratories and facilities”. BIORISK MANAGEMENT AND THE AMP MODEL (Assessment, Mitigation, Performance) BRM encompasses the identification, understanding and management aspects of a system in interrelated processes. It is divided into three primary components: Assessment (A) Mitigation (M) Performance (P) This components are collectively captured by what is called the AMP model (WHO, 2010). BIORISK MANAGEMENT AND THE AMP MODEL
The model requires that control measures be based on a robust risk
assessment, and a continuous evaluation of effectiveness and suitability of the control measures. Like a three-legged stool, a biorisk system fails if one of the components or legs, is overlooked or is not addressed. In contrast to other risk management models, which typically focus heavily on mitigation measures, AMP focuses on all components with equal attention. KEY COMPONENTS OF BIORISK MANAGEMENT RISK ASSESSMENT • Initial step in implementing biorisk management • Includes identification of hazards and characterization of risks that are possibly present in the laboratory • HAZARD refers to anything in the environment that has the potential to cause harm while RISK is generally defined as the possibility that something bad or unpleasant (such as injury or loss) will happen. KEY COMPONENTS OF BIORISK MANAGEMENT • In order for a risk to occur, there must be a situation for the hazard to cause harm. • For example, a sharp needle is a hazard, but if no one is using it, the needle will not pose any risks. • Risk is the likelihood that an adverse event involving a specific hazard or threat will occur followed by the consequences of the occurrence. STEPS IN RISK ASSESSMENT
• In performing risk assessment, a structured and repeatable
process is followed. It consists of the following steps: 1. Define the situation – the risk assessment team must identify the following: Hazards and risks of the biological agents At-risk hosts (humans or animals) Work activities and laboratory environment (location, procedures, equipment) STEPS IN RISK ASSESSMENT
2. Define the risks – include a review of how individuals
inside and outside the laboratory may be exposed to the hazards. Inhalation Droplets Ingestion Inoculation STEPS IN RISK ASSESSMENT
3. Characterize the risk – the risk assessment team
needs to compare the likelihood and the consequences of infection – either qualitatively or quantitatively
4. Determine if the risks are acceptable or not –
this process of evaluating the biorisk arising from a biohazard takes into account the adequacy of any existing controls, and deciding whether or not the biorisk is acceptable. KEY COMPONENTS OF BIORISK MANAGEMENT MITIGATION PROCEDURES • The second fundamental component of the biorisk management model • Biorisk mitigation measures are actions and control measures that are put into place to reduce or eliminate the risks associated with biological agents and toxins. • There are five major areas of control or measures that can be employed in mitigating the risks. FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES 1. ELIMINATION MOST DIFFICULT AND MOST EFFECTIVE CONTROL MEASURE Involves the total decision not to work with a specific biological agent or even not doing the intended work Provides the highest degree of risk reduction FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES 2. Substitution Second control measure Replacement of procedures or biological agent with a similar entity in order to reduce the risks For example: A lab conducting research with the pathogen Bacillus anthracis is substituted by a less dangerous experimental surrogate such as the Bacillus thuringiensis FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES 3. ENGINEERING CONTROLS Includes physical changes in work stations, equipment, production facilities, or any other relevant aspect of work environment that can reduce or prevent exposure to hazards Examples are installation of biosafety cabinets, safety equipment, facility design enabling proper airflow, ventilation system, air treatment systems, controlled access zones, airlocks, separate buildings or modules to isolate the laboratory FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES 4. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS Policies, standards, and guidelines used to control risks Proficiency and competency training for laboratory staff is considered an administrative control Examples are displaying of biohazard or warning signages, markings, and labels, controlling visitor and working access, and documenting written standard operating procedures FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES 5. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) Last mitigation control measure These are devices worn by workers to protect them against chemicals, toxins, and pathogenic hazards in the laboratory Examples are: Gloves, Gown, Respirators LEAST EFFECTIVE MEASURE because it only protects the person wearing it, and only when it is used correctly FIVE COMPONENTS OF MITIGATION PROCEDURES
• The concept or hierarchy of controls describes the order of
effectiveness (from most effective to least effective) of mitigation measures and implies that this order should be taken into account when selecting and implementing controls to reduce risks. KEY COMPONENTS OF BIORISK MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The last pillar of the biorisk management model Involves a systematic process intended to achieve organizational objectives and goals Ensures that the implemented mitigation measures are indeed reducing or eliminating risks KEY COMPONENTS OF BIORISK MANAGEMENT
Also helps to highlight biorisk strategies that are not
working effectively and measures that are ineffective or unnecessary. These can be eliminated or replaced Performance management is simply a reevaluation of the overall mitigation strategy. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCEDURES Identify the Key Issues of Concern