Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
CEO TI Pakistan 1
Evaluation and Comparison of Bids for Goods and
Works
Invitation of Tenders .
For competitive bidding, whether open or limited, the bidding documents shall
include the following, namely:-
(a) invitation to bid;
(b) instructions to bidders;
(c) form of bid;
(d) form of contract;
(e) general or special conditions of contract;
(f) specifications and drawings or performance criteria (where applicable);
(g) list of goods or bill of quantities (where applicable);
(h) delivery time or completion schedule;
(i) qualification criteria (where applicable);
(j) bid evaluation criteria;
(k) format of all securities required (where applicable);
(l) details of standards (if any) that are to be used in assessing the quality of goods,
works or services specified; and
(m) any other detail not inconsistent with these rules that the procuring agency
may deem necessary.
CEO TI Pakistan 2
Evaluation and Comparison of
Bids for Goods and Works
Invitation of Tenders.
Use Standard Form of Bidding Documents issued by Pakistan
Engineering Council in August 2002, with amendments prescribed
by NACS 2002 & Public Procurement Rules, 2004.
CEO TI Pakistan 3
Use Standard Form of Bidding Documents issued by Pakistan
Engineering Council in August 2002, & World Bank SBD’s with
amendments prescribed by NACS 2002 & Public Procurement
Rules, 2004
3. Standard forms of tender documents for procurement of
works (Electrical and Mechanical)- Annexure IX
4. Escalation and Construction Contracts.- Annexure X
CEO TI Pakistan 4
Amendments to be made in these PEC & World Bank
Documents incorporating NACS 2002 & Public
Procurement Rules, 2004 as given below
1. Integrity Pact.
IP to be included as prescribed in by PPRA in 2002 for all
Procurements of over Rs 10 million value
CEO TI Pakistan 5
Amendments to be made in these PEC & World Bank
Documents incorporating NACS 2002 & Public
Procurement Rules, 2004 as given below
CEO TI Pakistan 7
Amendments to be made in these PEC & World Bank Documents
incorporating NACS 2002 & Public Procurement Rules, 2004 as
given below
Commercial Evaluation
It will be examined in detail whether the tenders comply with the commercial/
contractual conditions of the Tender Documents. It is expected that no major
deviation/stipulation shall be taken by the bidders. However there is no
information on the procedure of commercial evaluation. The procedure for
commercial evaluation has to be defined in the Tender Documents for
transparent evaluation. For this purpose following Clause is to be included in
the Tender Documents for Electrical & Mechanical Works. This clause has
been borrowed from the “Standard Bidding Documents for the Supply and
Installation of Plant and Equipment” prepared by the World Bank, issued in
November 1997, Revised January 1999 and March 2002.
CEO TI Pakistan 8
Evaluation
General
CEO TI Pakistan 9
Evaluation
(h) “lowest evaluated bid” means,-
(i) a bid most closely conforming to evaluation criteria and other conditions
specified in the bidding document; and
(ii) having lowest evaluated cost;
The basic sequence for bid evaluation is the same for all goods and works,
and consists of the following steps
Preliminary examination;
Determination of bid responsiveness;
Correction of arithmetic errors;
Conversion to common currency;
Quantification of omissions and deviations;
Application of evaluation criteria;
Comparison of bids; and
Preparation of evaluation report.
CEO TI Pakistan 10
Bid Evaluation Committee and its duties
In order to examine and evaluate bids, the Procuring Agency must appoint a
Bid Evaluation Committee comprising of minimum three odd number
members.
• Preliminary Examination
• Responsiveness Check
• Price Adjustment
• Delivery Schedules
• Commercial Aspects
• Technical Aspects
(continued)
CEO TI Pakistan 12
Bid Evaluation Committee and its duties
List of Attachments to the Bid Evaluation Report
CEO TI Pakistan 15
Evaluation and Comparison of Bids for Works
CEO TI Pakistan 18
Evaluation and Comparison of Bids for Works
CEO TI Pakistan 19
Evaluation of Deviations in Bids for Works Contracts.
The first stage in evaluation is to decide whether the deviations in a bid are so
material as to be unacceptable, and therefore are grounds for rejecting the bid.
Fairness to the other bidders is a prime consideration. A bidder’s deviation
which, in itself or by its withdrawal or rectification, would seriously affect the
competitive position of other bidders unless they were given the same
opportunity, would normally constitute grounds for rejection of the entire bid.
The following deviations (or some combination thereof) may result in
rejection of bids :
bid submission by a legal entity or joint venture different from that which was
Prequalified (excepting when all members of the new joint venture were
Prequalified initially);
the submission of a base bid subject to price adjustment when fixed price bids
were called for;
the submission of a bid based on an entirely different alternative design where
such had not been requested nor expressly permitted;
an inflexible time phasing of contract construction or performance not
conforming to prescribed critical key dates or “milestones” in a broader
construction program; and
sub-contracting in a substantially different amount and manner than specified
(continued)
CEO TI Pakistan 20
Evaluation of Deviations in Bids for Works Contracts.
Deviations from the bidding requirements which do not appear at first sight so
serious as to provide immediate grounds for bid rejection maybe considered
further in the evaluation process. The following are examples of such
deviations.
The details and implications of any deviations which are not explicit
should be clarified by the Engineer/Employer in discussion with
respective bidders without change in the substance or price of the bids.
Deviations or offers which are better than the requirements of the bid
specifications (e.g. higher quality materials and workmanship,
modified designs, shorter construction periods, etc.) should only be
regarded as benefits to the Employer and included in the evaluation if
specifically solicited in the bidding documents.
CEO TI Pakistan 22
Evaluation of Deviations in Bids for Works Contracts.
CEO TI Pakistan 23
Rejection of All Bids
In some situations the Procuring Agency is permitted to reject all
bids submitted in response to an invitation for bids.
The Procuring Agency may reject all bids under the following
circumstances:
1. Where the price in the lowest evaluated bid exceeds the
Procuring Agency’s bid cost estimates by a substantial margin;
2. When all the bids received are not responsive to the
requirements in the bid documents; and
3. Where the Procuring Agency after receiving bids reasonably
concludes that there is lack of competition.
Where all the bids are rejected, the Procuring Agency should
review the bidding documents and make any appropriate
revisions. If substantial changes are made to the bidding
documents, the Procuring Agency should then invite new bids
CEOon the basis of the new bidding documents.
TI Pakistan 24
The Standard Bid Evaluation Report
CEO TI Pakistan 26
TIME BASED PROCEDURE OF ROUTING THE CASES
Transparency International Pakistan
Prequalification and Tender
Documents to be ready in 45 days.
They should be ready by the time Administrative approval is received.
CEO TI Pakistan 30