Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Goods
Public Goods -- Definition
A good is purely public if it is both
nonexcludable and nonrival in
consumption.
– Nonexcludable -- all consumers
can consume the good.
– Nonrival -- each consumer can
consume all of the good.
Public Goods -- Examples
Broadcast radio and TV programs.
National defense.
Public highways.
Reductions in air pollution.
National parks.
Reservation Prices
A consumer’s reservation price for a
unit of a good is his maximum
willingness-to-pay for it.
Consumer’s wealth is w.
Utility of not having the good is U ( w ,0 ).
Reservation Prices
A consumer’s reservation price for a
unit of a good is his maximum
willingness-to-pay for it.
Consumer’s wealth is w.
Utility of not having the good is U ( w ,0 ).
Utility of paying p for the good is
U ( w p,1).
Reservation Prices
A consumer’s reservation price for a
unit of a good is his maximum
willingness-to-pay for it.
Consumer’s wealth is w.
Utility of not having the good is U ( w ,0 ).
Utility of paying p for the good is
U ( w p,1).
Reservation price r is defined by
U ( w ,0 ) U ( w r ,1).
Reservation Prices; An Example
Consumer’s utility is U ( x1 , x2 ) x1 ( x2 1).
Utility of not buying a unit of good 2 is
w w
V ( w ,0 ) ( 0 1) .
p1 p1
Utility of buying one unit of good 2 at
price p is
w p 2( w p )
V ( w p,1) (1 1) .
p1 p1
Reservation Prices; An Example
Reservation price r is defined by
V ( w ,0 ) V ( w r ,1)
I.e. by
w 2( w r ) w
r .
p1 p1 2
When Should a Public Good Be
Provided?
One unit of the good costs c.
Two consumers, A and B.
Individual payments for providing
the public good are gA and gB.
gA + gB c if the good is to be
provided.
When Should a Public Good Be
Provided?
Payments must be individually
rational; i.e.
U A ( wA ,0 ) U A ( wA gA ,1)
and
UB ( wB ,0 ) UB ( wB gB ,1).
When Should a Public Good Be
Provided?
Payments must be individually
rational; i.e.
U A ( wA ,0 ) U A ( wA gA ,1)
and
UB ( wB ,0 ) UB ( wB gB ,1).
Therefore, necessarily
gA rA and gB rB .
When Should a Public Good Be
Provided?
And if U A ( wA ,0 ) U A ( wA gA ,1)
and
UB ( wB ,0 ) UB ( wB gB ,1)
then it is Pareto-improving to supply
the unit of good
When Should a Public Good Be
Provided?
And if U A ( wA ,0 ) U A ( wA gA ,1)
and
UB ( wB ,0 ) UB ( wB gB ,1)
then it is Pareto-improving to supply
the unit of good, so rA rB c
is sufficient for it to be efficient to
supply the good.
Private Provision of a Public
Good?
Suppose rA c and rB c .
Then A would supply the good even
if B made no contribution.
B then enjoys the good for free; free-
riding.
Private Provision of a Public
Good?
Suppose rA c and rB c .
Then neither A nor B will supply the
good alone.
Private Provision of a Public
Good?
Suppose rA c and rB c .
Then neither A nor B will supply the
good alone.
Yet, if rA rB c also, then it is Pareto-
improving for the good to be supplied.
Private Provision of a Public
Good?
Suppose rA c and rB c .
Then neither A nor B will supply the
good alone.
Yet, if rA rB c also, then it is Pareto-
improving for the good to be supplied.
A and B may try to free-ride on each
other, causing no good to be supplied.
Free-Riding
Suppose A and B each have just two
actions -- individually supply a public
good, or not.
Cost of supply c = $100.
Payoff to A from the good = $80.
Payoff to B from the good = $65.
Free-Riding
Suppose A and B each have just two
actions -- individually supply a public
good, or not.
Cost of supply c = $100.
Payoff to A from the good = $80.
Payoff to B from the good = $65.
$80 + $65 > $100, so supplying the
good is Pareto-improving.
Free-Riding
Player B
Don’t
Buy Buy
MUB
MUA
G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG
MUA+MUB
MUB
MUA
G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG
MUA+MUB
MUB MC(G)
MUA
G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG
MUA+MUB
MUB MC(G)
MUA
G* G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG
MUA+MUB
MUB MC(G)
pG*
MUA
G* G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG *
pG MU A (G*) MUB (G*)
MUA+MUB
MUB MC(G)
pG*
MUA
G* G
Efficient Public Good Supply --
the Quasilinear Preferences Case
pG *
pG MU A (G*) MUB (G*)
MUA+MUB
MUB MC(G)
pG*
MUA
G* G
Efficient public good supply requires A & B
to state truthfully their marginal valuations.
Free-Riding Revisited
When is free-riding individually
rational?
Free-Riding Revisited
When is free-riding individually
rational?
Individuals can contribute only
positively to public good supply;
nobody can lower the supply level.
Free-Riding Revisited
When is free-riding individually
rational?
Individuals can contribute only
positively to public good supply;
nobody can lower the supply level.
Individual utility-maximization may
require a lower public good level.
Free-riding is rational in such cases.
Free-Riding Revisited
Given A contributes gA units of
public good, B’s problem is
max UB ( xB , gA gB )
xB , gB
subject to x B gB w B , gB 0.
Free-Riding Revisited
gA
xB
Free-Riding Revisited
xB
Free-Riding Revisited
xB
Free-Riding Revisited
xB
Free-Riding Revisited
xB
Demand Revelation
A scheme that makes it rational for
individuals to reveal truthfully their
private valuations of a public good is
a revelation mechanism.
E.g. the Groves-Clarke taxation
scheme.
How does it work?
Demand Revelation
N individuals; i = 1,…,N.
All have quasi-linear preferences.
vi is individual i’s true (private)
valuation of the public good.
Individual i must provide ci private
good units if the public good is
supplied.
Demand Revelation
ni = vi - ci is net value, for i = 1,…,N.
Pareto-improving to supply the
public good if
N N
vi ci
i 1 i 1
Demand Revelation
ni = vi - ci is net value, for i = 1,…,N.
Pareto-improving to supply the
public good if
N N N
vi ci ni 0.
i 1 i 1 i 1
Demand Revelation
N N
If n 0 and ni n j 0
i
i j i j
N N
or ni 0 and ni n j 0
i j i j
N N
If ni 0, then ni 0 is the loss.
i j i j
Demand Revelation
For efficiency, a pivotal agent must
face the full cost or benefit of her
action.
The GC tax scheme makes pivotal
agents face the full stated costs or
benefits of their actions in a way that
makes these statements truthful.
Demand Revelation
The GC tax scheme:
Assign a cost ci to each individual.
Each agent states a public good net
valuation, si. N
Public good is supplied if si 0;
i 1
otherwise not.
Demand Revelation
A pivotal person j who changes the
outcome from supply to not supply
N
pays a tax of si .
i j
Demand Revelation
A pivotal person j who changes the
outcome from supply to not supply
N
pays a tax of si .
i j
A pivotal person j who changes the
outcome from not supply to supply
N
pays a tax of si .
i j
Demand Revelation
Note: Taxes are not paid to other
individuals, but to some other agent
outside the market.
Demand Revelation
Why is the GC tax scheme a
revelation mechanism?
Demand Revelation
Why is the GC tax scheme a
revelation mechanism?
An example: 3 persons; A, B and C.
Valuations of the public good are:
$40 for A, $50 for B, $110 for C.
Cost of supplying the good is $180.
Demand Revelation
Why is the GC tax scheme a
revelation mechanism?
An example: 3 persons; A, B and C.
Valuations of the public good are:
$40 for A, $50 for B, $110 for C.
Cost of supplying the good is $180.
$180 < $40 + $50 + $110 so it is
efficient to supply the good.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(50 - 60) + $(110 - 60) = $40 > 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $40 = $20 > 0.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(50 - 60) + $(110 - 60) = $40 > 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $40 = $20 > 0.
So A is not pivotal.
Demand Revelation
If B and C are truthful, then what net
valuation sA should A state?
Demand Revelation
If B and C are truthful, then what net
valuation sA should A state?
If sA > -$20, then A makes supply of
the public good, and a loss of $20 to
him, more likely.
Demand Revelation
If B and C are truthful, then what net
valuation sA should A state?
If sA > -$20, then A makes supply of
the public good, and a loss of $20 to
him, more likely.
A prevents supply by becoming
pivotal, requiring
sA + $(50 - 60) + $(110 - 60) < 0;
I.e. A must state sA < -$40.
Demand Revelation
Then A suffers a GC tax of
-$10 + $50 = $40,
A’s net payoff is
- $20 - $40 = -$60 < -$20.
Demand Revelation
Then A suffers a GC tax of
-$10 + $50 = $40,
A’s net payoff is
- $20 - $40 = -$60 < -$20.
A can do no better than state the
truth; sA = -$20.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
A & C’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $(110 - 60) = $30 > 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(50 - 60) + $30 = $20 > 0.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
A & C’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $(110 - 60) = $30 > 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(50 - 60) + $30 = $20 > 0.
So B is not pivotal.
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sB should B state?
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sB should B state?
If sB > -$10, then B makes supply of
the public good, and a loss of $10 to
him, more likely.
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sB should B state?
If sB > -$10, then B makes supply of
the public good, and a loss of $10 to
him, more likely.
B prevents supply by becoming
pivotal, requiring
sB + $(40 - 60) + $(110 - 60) < 0;
I.e. B must state sB < -$30.
Demand Revelation
Then B suffers a GC tax of
-$20 + $50 = $30,
B’s net payoff is
- $10 - $30 = -$40 < -$10.
B can do no better than state the
truth; sB = -$10.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
A & B’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $(50 - 60) = -$30 < 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(110 - 60) - $30 = $20 > 0.
Demand Revelation
Assign c1 = $60, c2 = $60, c3 = $60.
A & B’s net valuations sum to
$(40 - 60) + $(50 - 60) = -$30 < 0.
A, B & C’s net valuations sum to
$(110 - 60) - $30 = $20 > 0.
So C is pivotal.
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sC should C state?
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sC should C state?
sC > $50 changes nothing. C stays
pivotal and must pay a GC tax of
-$(40 - 60) - $(50 - 60) = $30, for a net
payoff of $(110 - 60) - $30 = $20 > $0.
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sC should C state?
sC > $50 changes nothing. C stays
pivotal and must pay a GC tax of
-$(40 - 60) - $(50 - 60) = $30, for a net
payoff of $(110 - 60) - $30 = $20 > $0.
sC < $50 makes it less likely that the
public good will be supplied, in which
case C loses $110 - $60 = $50.
Demand Revelation
What net valuation sC should C state?
sC > $50 changes nothing. C stays pivotal
and must pay a GC tax of
-$(40 - 60) - $(50 - 60) = $30, for a net payoff
of $(110 - 60) - $30 = $20 > $0.
sC < $50 makes it less likely that the public
good will be supplied, in which case C loses
$110 - $60 = $50.
C can do no better than state the truth; sC =
$50.
Demand Revelation
GC tax scheme implements efficient
supply of the public good.
Demand Revelation
GC tax scheme implements efficient
supply of the public good.
But, causes an inefficiency due to
taxes removing private good from
pivotal individuals.