Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. Industry vs 6-12 years This period reflects the determination of children to master what they are
Inferiority doing so that they develop a successful sense of modesty industry.
(School Parents, teachers Those who ignore, rebuff, deride
age) who support, children’s effort are strengthening
reward and praise feelings of inferiority.
children are
encouraging and
help in developing
children’s sense of
industry.
5. Identity vs 12-20 As young adults, they seek independence from parents, achieve physical
Role years maturity and are concerned about what kind of persons they are becoming.
Confusion Seeking to find an When the adolescent fails to
identity, develop a sense of identity, he/she
adolescents try on
1. Identity vs 12-20 As young adults, they seek independence from parents, achieve physical
Role years maturity and are concerned about what kind of persons they are becoming.
Confusion Seeking to find an When the adolescent fails to
(Adolesc identity, develop a sense of identity, he/she
ence & adolescents try on experiences role confusion or a
Puberty) many new roles. If ”negative identity.”
they experience
continuity in their
perception of self,
identity develops.
2. Intimacy vs 20-40- Young adults reach out and make contact with other people and to fuse one’s
Isolation years identity with that of others to develop intimate relationship.
(Young Central to Failure to establish close and intimate
adulthood) intimacy relationship results to a feeling of isolation.
is the
ability to
share with
and care
for others.
3. Generativity 40-65 This stage involves having a sense of productivity and creativity.
vs Generativity: Has Stagnation- condition in which individuals are n
Stagnation to do with parental meaning and purpose in life and have little inter
(Adultho responsibility, improvement or in making contributions to soci
od) interest in
producing, and
guiding the next
generation. Entails
selflessness.
4. Integrity vs Old Age The stage of facing reality, recognizing and accepting other. Individuals in
Despair to Death self-improvement or in making contributions to society taking stock of the
(Old age) years that have gone before.
Some feel a sense Others experience despair, feeling
of satisfaction that the time is too short for an
with their life’s attempt to start another life and to
accomplishment, try out alternative roads to
achieving a sense integrity.
of integrity
Erikson’s Eight Basic Virtues
The following are the 8 basic virtues in relation to the 8 stages of psychosocial development:
Hope is the enduring belief in the obtainability of fervent wishes, in spite of the dark urges and rages which
mark the beginning of existence.
Will is the unbroken determination to exercise free choice as well as self-restraint, in spite of the unavoidable
experience of shame and doubts.
Purpose is the courage to envisage and pursue valued goals uninhibited by the defeat of infantile fantasies, by
guilt and by the foiling fear of punishment.
Competence is the free exercise of dexterity and intelligence in their completion of tasks, unimpaired by
infantile inferiority
Fidelity is the ability to sustain loyalties freely pledged in spite of the inevitable contradictions of value systems
Love is mutuality of devotion forever subduing that antagonism inherent in divided function.
Care is the widening concern for what has been generated by love, necessity, or accident; it overcomes the
ambivalence adhering to irreversible obligation.
Wisdom is detached concern with life itself, in the face of death itself. (Erikson, 1963)
OVERVIEW OF PSYCHOANALYTIC SOCIAL THEORY
The psychoanalytic social theory of Karen Horney was built on the assumption
that social and cultural conditions, especially childhood experiences, are largely
responsible for shaping personality. People who do not have their needs for love
and affection satisfied during childhood develop basic hostility toward their
parents and, as a consequence, suffer from basic anxiety. Horney theorized that
people combat basic anxiety by adopting one of three fundamental styles of
relating to others: (1) moving toward people, (2) moving against people, or (3)
moving away from people. Normal individuals may use any of these modes of
relating to other people, but neurotics are compelled to rigidly rely on only one.
Although Horney’s writings are concerned mostly with the neurotic personality,
many of her ideas can also be applied to normal individuals. This part looks at
Horney’s basic theory of neurosis, compares her ideas to those of Freud,
examines her views on feminine psychology
II. HORNEY’S PRINCIPLES
In her emphasis on social influences, Horney contributed to the psychoanalytic approach in
two key areas: neurosis and feminine psychology.
A. NEUROSIS
Neurosis is defined as a mild mental disorder that affects one aspect of personality.
According to Horney, neurosis is developed due the disturbed interpersonal relationship during
childhood. Specifically, she believed that parents who fail to provide the proper environment
for their children will create feelings of anxiety, “the feeling a child had of being isolated and
helpless in a potentially hostile world”.
The parent can generate feelings of anxiety that can lead to neurosis by means of the
following: (direct or indirect domination; indifference or lack of reliable warmth erratic
(inconsistent) behavior; lack of respect for the child’s individual needs; lack of real guidance;
disparaging (disapproving) attitude; too much admiration or the absence of it; too much or too
little responsibility; over-protection; isolation from other children; injustice; discrimination;
unkept promises; and hostile atmosphere)
Ten Neurotic Needs
The table below illustrates the ten needs from which Horney evolved her three basic
adjustment techniques or styles. These needs are the result of the disturbed interpersonal
relationship specifically the parent-child relationship. All personalities have these needs to some
extent. The neurotic has them to an overpowering degree.
B. FEMININE PSYCHOLOGY
As a psychoanalyst in the 1930s, Horney found herself a woman in a man’s world. Many of her initial
doubts about Freud’s theory began when Horney found she couldn’t agree with some of Freud’s disparaging
views of women.
For an instance, Freud maintained that the essence of female development could be found in the concept
of penis envy, the desire of every young girl to be a boy. Horney countered this male-flattering position with
the concept of womb envy, which maintains that men are jealous of women’s ability to bear and nurse
children. Horney did not suggest that men are therefore dissatisfied with themselves, but rather she argued
that each sex has attributes that the other admires. She did suggest, however, that men compensate for their
inability to have children through achievement in other domains.
OVERVIEW OF INTERPERSONAL THEORY
Harry Stack Sullivan, the first American to construct a comprehensive personality theory, believed
that people develop their personality within a social context. Without other people, Sullivan contended,
humans would have no personality. “A personality can never be isolated from the complex of
interpersonal relations in which the person lives and has his being” (Sullivan, 1953).
Sullivan insisted that knowledge of human personality can be gained only through the scientific
study of interpersonal relations. His interpersonal theory emphasizes the importance of various
developmental stages- infancy, childhood, juvenile era, preadolescence, early adolescence, late
adolescence, and adulthood.
In many ways, Sullivan’s theory is dramatically different from Freud. In fact, some writers prefer to
place Sullivan’s theory in a category other than psychoanalytic approach. His rejection of many Freud’s
concepts and his emphasis on the interpersonal nature of personality places Sullivan’s approach
somewhere between that of the psychoanalysis and that of the social learning theorists.
II. SULLIVAN’S PRINCIPLES/ CONCEPTS
Some of the important and interesting concepts proposed by Sullivan are discussed
below
A. Tension- it refers to the potentiality for action that may or may not be experienced in
awareness. Thus, not all tensions are consciously felt. Sullivan recognized two types of
tensions: needs and anxiety.
Needs- there are tensions brought on by biological imbalance between a person and
physiochemical environment, both inside and outside the organism. Although needs originally
have a biological component, many of them stem from the interpersonal situation. For
Sullivan, the most basic interpersonal need is tenderness.
General needs- facilitate the overall well-being of a person which includes
interpersonal and physiological needs
Zonal needs- arise from a particular area of the body which includes oral, genital, and
manual.
Anxiety- it is the chief disruptive force blocking the development of healthy interpersonal
relations. Severe anxiety makes people incapable of learning, impairs memory, narrows
perception, and may even result in complete amnesia. Because anxiety is painful, people have
a natural tendency to avoid it, inherently preferring the state of euphoria, or complete lack of
tension.
Anxiety- it is the chief disruptive force blocking the development of healthy interpersonal
relations. Severe anxiety makes people incapable of learning, impairs memory, narrows
perception, and may even result in complete amnesia. Because anxiety is painful, people
have a natural tendency to avoid it, inherently preferring the state of euphoria, or
complete lack of tension.
B. Energy Transformations- these are the tensions that are transformed into actions,
either overt or covert. This somewhat awkward term simply refers to our behaviors that
are aimed at satisfying needs and reducing anxiety- the two great tensions.
In 1913 a young psychologist named John B. Watson published an article entitled “Psychology as
the Behaviorist View It,” which signaled the beginning of a new movement in psychology- behaviorism.
By 1924, with the publication of Behaviorism, Watson had made significant progress in his effort to
redefine the discipline of psychology.
Watson argued that if psychology was to be a science, psychologists must stop their efforts to
examine mental states. He claimed that researchers who concerned themselves with such things as
consciousness, the mind, and thoughts were not engaging in legitimate scientific study. Watson argued
that only the observable could be reasonable subject matter for a science. Because subjective feelings
cannot be objectively observed, they have no place in an objective science. What, then, was the
appropriate subject matter for psychologists? Watson’s answer was overt behavior- that which can be
observed, predicted, and eventually controlled by the scientist (Burger, 1986).
To illustrate behaviorism, Watson conducted an experiment using Baby Albert as a subject. Below
is the sequence of Watson’s experiment.
Before Conditioning
Stimulus Response
White Rat No fear
Noise Fear
During Conditioning (Repeated pairing)
White Rat-Noise- FEAR
After Conditioning
White Rat- FEAR
Part II. OPERANT CONDITIONING (Burrhus F. Skinner)
B.F. Skinner devised a box which is called “SKINNER’S BOX”. In the box, there is push a
button and food pellets inside a food dispenser. Then, he put hungry rat inside the box and
since its hungry-the rat was restless and was moving around the box. Accidentally, the rat
pushed the button, then food pellet appears from the food dispenser. And since, the rat was
hungry he repeatedly push the button to get food pellets.
The experiment shows that the rat learned to push the button because of the food pellets
coming from the food dispenser. Therefore, the behavior of the rat was formed or modified because
of a specific consequence/ reinforcement. For better understanding of this theory, let us discuss
the four procedures of operant conditioning.
Four Procedures of Operant Conditioning
1. Positive reinforcement- it occurs when the behavior is followed by a favorable stimulus.
2. Negative reinforcement- it occurs when the behavior is followed by the removal of aversive/ unfavorable stimulus.
3. Positive punishment- it occurs when the behavior is followed by unfavorable/ aversive stimulus.
4. Negative punishment- it occurs when the behavior is followed by the removal of favorable stimulus.
Schedules of Reinforcement
A reinforcement schedule is simply a rule that states under what conditions a reinforcer will be delivered. There are four
schedules of reinforcement.
5. Fixed Ratio- in this schedule, a fixed number of responses must be made before the reward is administered. For example, a
factory worker is paid PhP20.00 for every 12 shirt collars sewed. Thus, he or she is paid on FR12 schedule (Dela Cruz &
Lee-Chua, 2008).
2.Variable Ratio- the number of responses determines the delivery of reinforcement; but the ratio changes from reinforcement
to reinforcement. Slot machines are set to pay-off according to a variable-ratio schedule. A variable-ratio schedule keeps people
coming back and guessing the next pay-off will be.
3.Fixed Interval- in this schedule, the reinforcement will be delivered after a specified passage of time. For example, salaried
employees who receive their paycheck every week is reinforced on an FI schedule.
4.Variable Interval- in this schedule, the length of time is varied or unspecified before the delivery of the
reinforcement. For example, you are waiting for the bus to arrive. After 5 minutes the bus does arrive. Then
another bus arrives after 10 minutes, then the next after 15 minutes.
Shaping
One of the problems encountered when working with operant conditioning is that the desired behavior
must be emitted before it can be reinforced. A psychologist could wait a long time for a rat to press a bar by
chance, and just as long again for that rat, even after being reinforced, to do it again. The psychologist in this
case would probably use a technique called shaping, in which successive approximations of the desired
behavior are reinforced.
For example in the classroom, shaping can be used with children who have behavioral problems.
Hyperactive children typically have difficulty paying attention in class and cannot stay in their seats for a very
long time. Through shaping, a child can be reinforced with a star, a token, or stickers for staying in his seat for
a few seconds. In subsequent days, the child can be reinforced for staying in his seat for progressively longer
and longer periods of time (20 seconds, 30 seconds, one minute, and so on). Finally, the child is reinforced
only for staying in his seat for the entire class period. Thus, shaping involves reinforcing behaviors until the
desired behavior finally
SKINNER’S VIEW OF THE UNHEALTHY PERSONALITY
Unfortunately, the techniques of social control and self-control sometimes produce
detrimental effects, which result in inappropriate behavior and unhealthy personality
development.
Counteracting Strategies
When social control is excessive, people can use three basic strategies for counteracting
it- they can escape, revolt, or use passive resistance (Skinner, 1953).
Scape- people withdraw from the controlling agent either physically or psychologically.
People who counteract by escape find it difficult to become involved in intimate personal
relationships, tend to be mistrustful of people and prefer to live lonely lives of
noninvolvement.
Revolt- people using this strategy behave more actively, counterattacking the controlling
agent. They can rebel through vandalizing public property, tormenting teachers, verbally
abusing other people, and the like.
Passive resistance- the conspicuous feature of this strategy is stubbornness. For example,
a child with homework to do finds a dozen of excuses why it cannot be
Inappropriate Behaviors
Inappropriate behaviors follow from self-defeating techniques of
counteracting social control or from unsuccessful attempts at self-control,
especially when either of these failures is accompanied by strong emotions.
These behaviors include excessively vigorous behavior, which makes no
sense in terms of the contemporary situation, but might be reasonable in
terms of past history; and excessively restrained behavior, which people use
as a means of avoiding the aversive stimuli associated with punishment.
Another type of inappropriate behaviors is blocking out reality by simply
paying no attention to aversive stimuli.
Part III. CLASSICAL CONDITIONING (Ivan Pavlov)
Classical conditioning is a process in which an unconditioned stimulus is repeatedly paired
with a conditioned stimulus until the conditioned stimulus comes to elicit a response without the
presentation of the unconditioned stimulus.
This theory is also illustrated by an experiment conducted by Ivan Pavlov.
Before Conditioning
Stimulus Response
Bell (CS) No salivation
Meat powder (US) Salivation
After Conditioning
Bell- Salivation (CR)
The dog learned to salivate because of the repeated associations of bell and meat powder.
Therefore, a behavior can also be learned by means of this process called conditioning. As stated
by Burger, we are probably not aware of all the associations we make by pairing stimuli in our
everyday environments. Research suggests that preferences in food, clothing, and even friends can
be influenced through this process.
Extinction: Weakening Conditioned Responses
What happens if the CS repeatedly occurs without the US? What would happen if Pavlov exposed the dog to the bell without the mea
powder? The response would gradually weaken and be eventually eliminated, and extinction would take place.
For example, as a young child, you might have learned to fear going to the dentist’s office. You learned this fear (CR) because yo
associated the dentist’s office (CS) with pain (UR) when the dentist filled your tooth (US). However, as you grew up, you went to the dentist on
number of occasions but did not experience pain. Subsequently, your childhood fear of dental offices was extinguished (Dela Cruz & Lee-Chua
2008)
Spontaneous Recovery: Recovering Conditioned Responses
Pavlov observed that after extinction was completed and the dog was returned to the experimental chamber where the CS was presente
again, salivation, which was previously extinguished, reappeared. Pavlov called this reappearance of conditioned behavior spontaneous recover
and treated it as evidence that the CS-US association is not permanently destroyed in an extinction procedure. The phenomenon of spontaneou
recovery shows that the CR was not unlearned during extinction, but was being actively inhibited by the organism.
An example of spontaneous recovery in real life is when a child who has ceased to be afraid of the dental office in the last few visit
becomes afraid again after a new experience.
Generalization and Discrimination
Pavlov found that CRs occur not only when confronted by the CS during training, but also in the face of similar
stimuli. This phenomenon is called stimulus generalization. In the experiment, for instance, the dog generalized his response to other similar
sounds like buzzer.
On the other hand, if you condition a dog to salivate to a conditioned stimulus such as a circle, and present another stimulus such as
circle, and present another stimulus such as an ellipse, but never reinforce the response in the presence of an ellipse, the dog will respond to th
circle but not to the ellipse. This phenomenon is called stimulus discrimination, the learned tendency to respond to the stimulus used in training.
Part IV. SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY (Albert Bandura)
Social cognitive theory is learning by observing the behavior of others. Bandura proposes
that human beings are capable of creating their own standards of performance that can serve to
guide behavior in the absence of any external sources of reinforcement.
Bandura believes that new behaviors are acquired through two major kinds of learning:
observational learning and enactive learning. To illustrate the theory of Bandura, take a look on
the experiment he conducted in the table below.
The strength of the behavior potential for a given behavior is determined by three variables:
expectancy, reinforcement value, and the psychological situation. In short, people calculate the
chances of obtaining a given reinforce for their actions and the value the reinforcer has for them. If the
odds of being reinforced for a behavior are slim or the reinforcer is not particularly prized, then the
behavior potential is weak. Because no two situations are exactly alike, and because personality
predispositions alone are limited behavior predictors, Rotter also includes the psychological situation
in his model. Rotter explains that “each situation is composed of cues serving to arouse in the
individual certain expectancies for reinforcement of specific behaviors.”
B. Expectancy
For any given behavior, we can estimate the likelihood of its being reinforced. What are the chances that
staying up all night studying will result in a higher grade? How likely is it that you will have a good time if you go
to the dance? Rotter calls this estimation expectancy: “the probability held by the individual that a particular
reinforcement will occur as a function of a specific behavior on his part in a specific situation or situations.”
C. Reinforcement Value
Another important determinant of the behavior is the value that the reward holds for the individual. Rotter
calls this reinforcement value- the degree of preference for any reinforcement to occur if the possibilities of their
occurring were all equal”. Naturally, the reinforcement values of certain rewards changes somewhat from situation
and across time. For example, when we are lonely, social contact will hold a higher reinforcement values than
when we aren’t. Yet, there are stable individual differences from person to person, which lend stability to our
reinforcement values over time and across situations. Given the choice, some people will always take free baseball
tickets over free ballet tickets.
D. Psychological Situation- defined as part of the external and internal world to which a person is
responding. Rotter
3. Personality has a basic unity
4. Motivation is goal directed
5. People are capable of anticipating events
Rotter’s and Hochreich’s Categories of Needs
1. Recognition-Status
2. Dominance
3. Independence
4. Protection- Dependency
5. Love and Affection
6. Physical comfort
Rotters’ Internal-External Control Scale
This I-E scale attempts to measure the degree to which people perceive a causal relationship between
their own efforts and environment consequence. People who score high on internal control generally believe
that the source of control resides within themselves and that they exercise a high level of personal control in
most situations. On the other hand, people who score high on external control generally believe that their life
is largely controlled by forces outside themselves, such as chance, destiny, or the behavior of other people.
Rotter’s Interpersonal Trust Scale
Interpersonal trust is defined as a generalized expectancy held by an individual that the word, promise,
oral or written statement of another individual or group can be relied on. Rotter (1980) summarized results of
studies that indicate that people who score high in interpersonal trust, as opposed to those who score low, are:
1. less likely to lie
2. probably less likely to cheat or steal
3. more likely to give others a second chance
4. more likely to respect the rights of others
5. less likely to be unhappy, conflicted or maladjusted
6. somewhat more likeable and popular
7. more trustworthy
8. neither more nor less gullible
9. neither more nor less intelligence
Rotter’s Concept of Maladaptive Behavior
According to Rotter, maladaptive behavior is any persistent behavior that fails to move a person closer to
a desired goal. It frequently arises from the combination of high need value and low freedom of movement: that
is, from goals that are unrealistically high in relation to one’s ability to achieve them.
For example, the need for love and affection is realistic, but some people unrealistically set a goal to be
loved by everyone. Hence, their need value will nearly certainly exceed their freedom of movement, resulting
in behavior that is likely to be defensive or maladaptive
c
HUMANISTIC APPROACH
Part I. CARL ROGERS’ CLIENT-CENTERED PERSONALITY THEORY
When Carl Rogers started out, he was, like Freud, working with troubled people. Seeing the kind of
environment these individuals had gave Rogers insight into what was stopping them from reaching their full
potential. He hypothesized that all persons start out in life with positive feelings about themselves, but these
feelings may continually be eroded by the significant persons (parents, teachers, siblings, and friends) in their
respective worlds. For instance, the adults in a child’s life often make the giving of their love conditional- “I will
(love) you only if you conform to our standards (authority figures in particular, society in general)”- a stance
termed by Rogers as conditional positive regard. Thus, innately good feelings about the self gradually diminish
as children grow up, since constraints and negative feedback continue even during their adult lives. Trying to live
up to societal standards can lead to conflict, just as simply conforming may suggest a devaluing of one’s true self.
In certain cases, it can also lead to a complete loss of the sense of self.
For Rogers, the sense of self, the “I,” or the “me” develops through an individual’s experiences with the
world. A person’s self-concept (a central theme in humanistic psychology) refers to an individual’s overall
perceptions of his or her abilities, behavior, and personality. A person with a poor self-concept is likely to think,
feel, and act negatively.
According to Rogers, while not all aspects of the self are conscious, all are accessible to consciousness. He further
distinguishes between the real self (the self as a result of experiences) and the ideal self (the self the person would
like to be); the greater the discrepancy between the real self and the ideal self, the more maladjusted the person.
That people need to be accepted by others, regardless of what they do, was realized by Rogers who stressed
that we need to recognize each other’s worth and dignity as persons, giving each other unconditional
positive regard. We should be emphatic listeners in trying to understand another’s true feelings, and should
be genuine and open with our feelings in our human relations as well. Rogers believed strongly in the human
potential to resiliently adapt, develop, and become fully functioning individuals despite the constraints set by
the environment.
The Fully Functioning Person
Roger believes that we naturally strive to reach an optimal sense of ourselves and a satisfaction with our
lives. But this “good life” is not a static state.
To be functionally functioning means to be open to the constant flow of our existence. “The goodlife is a
process, not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination”.
The following are the characteristics of a fully functioning person:
1. They are open to their experiences.
2. They tend to open their eyes to what is going on in the here and now.
3. They trust their own feelings.
Unlike Freud, Rogers believes that all people are basically good. People are sometimes cruel, but, Rogers
maintains, provided we are allowed to be what we are, unburdened with life problems, all of us will fulfill
our potential as loving, trustworthy people.
Fully functioning people accept and occasionally express their
anger, but their constructive, affectionate impulses have an
increasingly large influence on their behavior as they grow.
Although effective in reducing anxiety, distorting and denying
information are defenses that take us further and further away from
experiencing life.
In severe cases, people replace reality with fantasy.
Example, student with poor grades might convince herself that she
is a genius. When the incongruence between the self-concept and
reality is so obvious that the defense processes can’t operate
adequately, the person experiences what Rogers calls a state of
disorganization.
Conditions of Worth & Unconditional Positive Regard
Why is it difficult to accept and incorporate inconsistent information into our self-concept?
According to Rogers, because most of us have grown up in an atmosphere of conditional
positive regard. As children, our parents and “significant others” provide us with love and
support, but often not unconditionally. That is, most parents will love their children as long
as what’s expected of them.
As a result of this conditional positive regard, children learn to abandon their true feelings
and desires and to accept only that part of themselves that the parents have deemed
appropriate.
Ultimately, because of these conditions of worth, children become less and less aware of
themselves and less able to become fully functioning in the future.
How can we come to accept our faults and weaknesses, when we know they may not be
accepted by others?
To Rogers, we need unconditional positive regard to accept all the parts of our
personality.
With unconditional positive regard we believe we will be accepted, loved, and “prized”, no
matter what we do.
Part II. ABRAHAM MASLOW’S HOLISTIC-DYNAMIC THEORY
Maslow termed his theory as holistic-dynamic theory because it assumes that the whole person is
constantly being motivated by one need or another and that people have the potential to grow toward
psychological health which is self-actualization. Abraham Maslow, like Rogers, had infinite faith in the
human capacity for growth. Maslow believed that we all have needs, and they come in two forms:
deficiency needs and growth needs (also known as “metaneeds” or “self-actualizing” needs).
Deficiency needs are related to an individual’s physiological needs (need for food, water, shelter, etc.)
and psychological needs (need for affection, security, self-esteem, etc.) Growth needs, on the other
hand, refer to such higher needs as the need for truth, beauty, goodness, wholeness, vitality, uniqueness,
perfection, and justice.
The following are the several basic assumptions of Maslow in his theory of motivation:
1. holistic approach to motivation;
2. motivation is usually complex;
3. people are continually motivated by one need or another;
4. all people everywhere are motivated by the same basic needs; and
5. needs can be arranged on a hierarchy.
Hierarchy of Needs
According to this theory, human cannot advance to the next level of needs without satisfying the lower level which means that you cannot achieve
the highest form of need (self- actualization) without satisfying the four lower needs. When needs are not met, an individual may become alienated,
weak, or cynical.
The following are the list of needs which are arranged from lowest (basic) to the highest (complex) form.
a. Physiological needs. These are the basic life needs which are necessary for our survival. Examples of these needs are food, water, air, sleep,
sex etc.
b. Security/ Safety needs. These are the needs to be free of physical danger and of the fear of losing a job, property or shelter. It also includes
protection against any emotional harm. Specific examples are protection, security, order, law, limits, stability etc.
c. Social Belongingness and love needs. Since men are social beings, they need to belong and be accepted by others. This need includes the
search and desire for friends, affection or intimate relationship, family, work group, etc.
d. Esteem needs. Maslow stressed that if man begins to satisfy the social belongingness needs, he will then seek to gain the respect and
recognition of others through his achievements. Specifically, this includes the need for achievements, status, good reputation that could lead to
self- respect.
e. Self- actualization. The highest level or form of needs according to Maslow is self- actualization. This can be defined as the man’s ability to
realize and achieve his full potentials. To be specific this needs include growth and self- fulfillment.
The abovementioned needs are called conative needs which mean that they have a striving or motivational character. Aside from the conative
needs, Maslow also identified three other categories of needs- aesthetic, cognitive, and neurotic.
The Jonah Complex- the fear of being one’s best. This complex is characterized by attempts to run away from one’s destiny, represents a
fear of success, a fear of being one’s best, and a feeling of awesomeness in the presence of beauty and perfection.
Part III. ROLLO MAY’S EXISTENTIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Background of Existentialism
Shortly after World War II, a new psychology- existential psychology- began to spread from Europe to the
United States. Existential psychology is rooted in the philosophy of Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzche,
Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and other European philosophers. The first existential psychologists and
psychiatrists were also Europeans, and these included Ludwig Binswanger, Medard Boss, Victor Frankl, and
others.
Modern existential psychology has roots in the writings of SOREN KIERKEGAARD, a Danish
philosopher and theologian. He was concerned with the increasing trend in postindustrial societies toward the
dehumanization of people. He opposed any attempt to see people merely as objects. Kierkegaard regards people
as thinking, active, and willing beings. Like later existentialists, Kierkegaard emphasized a balance between
freedom and responsibility.
What is existentialism?
1. Existentialism opposes the split between subject and object.
2. This philosophical thought states that people search for some meaning to their lives.
3. Existentialists hold that ultimately each of us is responsible for who we are and what we become.
4. Existentialists are basically antitheoretical.
Basic Concepts of Existentialism
1. Being-in-the-world- the basic unity of person and environment. It is expressed in the
German word Dasein, meaning to exist there. The hypens in this term imply a oneness of
subject and object, of person and world. Many people suffer from anxiety and despair
brought on by their alienation from themselves or from their world.
3 Modes of being-in-the-world
a. Umwelt- the environment around us
b. Mitwelt- our relationships with other people
c. Eigenwelt- our relationships with our self
2. Nonbeing- nothingness like death. “Death is the one fact of my life which is not relative
but absolute, and my awareness of this gives my existence and what I do each hour an
absolute quality” (May, 1958).
What is Existential Psychology?
Existential psychology is concerned with the individual’s struggle to work through life’s experiences and
to grow toward becoming more fully human.
Anxiety
May defined anxiety as the subjective state of the individual’s becoming aware that his or her existence can
be destroyed, that he can become nothing. May called anxiety a threat to some important value. Anxiety exists
when one confronts the issue of fulfilling one’s potentialities. This confrontation can lead to stagnation and
decay, but it can also result in growth and change.
Kierkegaard states that “anxiety is the dizziness of freedom.” Anxiety like dizziness, can be either
pleasurable or painful, constructive or destructive. Moreover, anxiety can be either normal or neurotic.
Normal Anxiety and Neurotic Anxiety
May defined normal anxiety as that “which is proportionate to the threat, does not involve repression, and
can be confronted constructively on the conscious level.”
Neurotic anxiety is a reaction which is disproportionate to the threat, involves repression and other forms
of intrapsychic conflict, and is managed by various kinds of blocking-off of activity and awareness.
Normal Anxiety and Neurotic Anxiety
May defined normal anxiety as that “which is proportionate to the threat, does not involve repression, and can be
confronted constructively on the conscious level.”
Neurotic anxiety is a reaction which is disproportionate to the threat, involves repression and other forms of
intrapsychic conflict, and is managed by various kinds of blocking-off of activity and awareness.
Guilt
Guilt arises when people deny their potentialities, fail to accurately perceive the needs of fellow humans, or remain
oblivious to their dependence on the natural world. Forms of guilt correspond to the 3 modes of being-in-the world which
includes umwelt, mitwelt, and eigenwelt.
Intentionality
Intentionality is the structure that gives meaning to experience and allows people to make decisions about the future.
Action implies intentionality, just as intentionality implies action; the two are inseparable.
Care, Love, and Will
Care is a state which something does matter.
Love is a delight in the presence of the other person and an affirming of value and development as much as one’s own.
Will is the capacity to organize one’s self so that movement in a certain direction or toward a certain goal may take
place.
Forms of Love
1. Sex- a biological function that can be satisfied through sexual intercourse or some other release of sexual tension.
2. Eros- psychological desire that seeks procreation or creation through an enduring union with a loved one.
3. Philia- intimate nonsexual friendship between two people which can also lead to erotic relationships.
4. Agape- esteem for the other, the concern for the other’s welfare beyond any gain that one can get out of i
disinterested love.
Freedom and Destiny
A blend of the four forms of love requires both self-assertion and an affirmation of the other person. It also require
an assertion of one’s freedom and a confrontation with one’s destiny. Healthy individuals are able both to assume the
freedom and to face their destiny.
Freedom- it refers to the individual’s capacity to know that he is the determined one. It entails being able to harbo
different possibilities in one’s mind even though it is not clear at the moment which may one must act.
Forms of Freedom
Existential freedom- it is the freedom to act on the choices that one makes.
Essential freedom- it is the freedom of being.
Destiny- the design of the universe speaking through the design of each one of us.
May’s Concept of Psychopathology
According to May, apathy and emptiness are the malaise of modern times. When people deny their destiny o
abandon their myths, they lose their purpose for being; they become directionless. Without some goal or destination
people become sick and engage in a variety of self-defeating and self-destructive behaviors.
COGNITIVE APPROACH
Introduction
In the past few years there has been a growing interest in yet another approach to personality.
The newest member of the club, the cognitive approach, describes differences in personality
as differences in the way people process information. When people demonstrate noticeable
different patterns of behavior it is the result of differences in the way they perceive the world
and in the way they organize and utilize this information.
Cognitive models of personality are not entirely new. Kurt Lewin’s (1938) “field theory” of
behavior described differences in the way people organize the various representations of the
elements in their lives within their cognitive “life space.”
Moral approach
Jean Piaget of theory of moral development explains how a child’s constructs a mental
model of the world. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was affixed trait, and
regarded cognitive development as a process which occur due to biological maturation and
interaction with the environment.
Piaget presented 2 stages of moral development.
He labeled the first as heteronomous morality. This is the stage at which children think
that rules are unchangeable and that breaking them leads automatically to punishment.
The stage at which a person understands that people make rules and that punishments
are not automatic is the second, which he called autonomous morality.
HETERONOMOUS MORALITY (YOUNGER)
Based on relations of constraint; for example, the complete acceptance by the child of
adult prescriptions.
Reflected in attitudes of moral realism: Rules are seen as inflexible requirements,
external in origin and authority, not open to negotiation; and right is a matter of literal
obedience to adults and rules.
AUTONOMOUS MORALITY (OLDER)
Based on relations of cooperation and mutual recognition of equality among autonomous
individuals, as in relations between people who are equals.
Reflected in rational moral attitudes: rules are viewed as products of mutual agreement,
open to renegotiation, made legitimate by personal acceptance and common consent,
and right is a matter of acting in accordance with the requirements of cooperation and
mutual respect.
Kohlberg’s Stages of moral Reasoning
Lawrence Kohlberg-constitute an adaptation of a psychological theory originally
conceived by the Swiss psychologist jean piaget. The theory holds that moral reasoning,
the basis for ethical behavior, has six identifiable development stages, each more
adequate at responding to moral dilemmas than its predecessor. Kohlberg followed the
development of moral judgment far beyond the ages studied earlier by piaget who also
claimed that logic and morality develop through constructive stages
I. PRECCONVENTIONAL LEVEL
Rules are set down by others.
Stage 1: Punishment and Obedience Orientation. Physical consequences of action
determine its goodness or badness.
Stage 2: Instrumental Relativist Orientation. What is right is whatever satisfies
one’s own needs and occasionally the needs of others. Elements of fairness and
reciprocity are present.
II. CONVENTIONAL LEVEL
Stage 3: “Good Boy—Good Girl” Orientation. Good behavior is whatever pleases or helps
others and is approved of by them. One earns approval be being “nice.”
Stage 4: “Law and Order” Orientation. Right is doing one's duty, showing respect for
authority, and maintaining the given social order for its own sake. People define own values
in terms of ethical principles they have chosen to follow.
III. POSTCONVENSTIONAL LEVEL
Stage 5: Social contract Orientation. What is right is defined in terms of general individual
rights and in terms of standards that have been agreed on by the whole society. Laws are
not “frozen”—they can be changed for the good of society.
Stage 6: Universal Ethical Principle Orientation. What is right is defined by decision of
conscience according to self-chosen ethical principles. These principles are abstract and
ethical (such as the Golden Rule), not specific moral prescriptions (such as the Ten
Commandments).