Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sun et al., 2015 The process starts by feeding preheated air to Remarkable differences in the
oil shale to initiate a topochemical reaction characteristics energy. No reaction
and the onset of self-pyrolysis. As the process supporting yield.
temperature in the virgin oil shale increases
(to 250–300 C).
Aim
Oil Shale Plastics
*Partial substitution of fossil *New technology to reduce the
fuels negative environmental impact
*Generate the necessary of waste plastics
energy to supply the *landfills leach the soil
increasing energy demand *incineration produce several
*Alternative fuel source pollutants
co-pyrolysis of plastic wastes and oil shale
METHODOLOGY
Sample Crushing
Collection Screening
Pyrolysis
DTGA
(TGA)
RESULTS
• Activation energy gotten
from the slope is 75.5kJ/mol
• Tmax is 421.75°C and the
burn out temperature is
565.09°C.
Figure 1 the kinetic parameter of
Lokpanta oil shale
RESULTS • degradation happened in three
stages, The first stage-28-
316.41oC, which corresponded to
the departure of the absorbed
water from the sample.
• The second stage - 316.41 and
481.47oC which correlates to the
overlapping of the organic matter
of the oil shale and HDPE
degradation.
Figure 3 thermo-gravimetric analysis of Lokpanta oil shale • The third stage- 481.47 and
and HDPE mixture (left) differential thermal analysis of
Lokpanta oil shale and HDPE mixture (right)
887.44oC degradation of mineral
matter of the oil shale content in
the mixture (calcite, quartz,
kaolin, etc.).
RESULTS
• Tmax which is 442.27 oC and
the burn out temperature is
at 586.93 oC
• activation energy is
207.4kJ/mol
Figure 2 thermo-gravimetric analysis of HDPE (left)
differential thermal analysis of HDPE (right)
RESULTS
• Tmax which is 442.27 oC and
the burn out temperature is
at 586.93 oC
• activation energy is
207.4kJ/mol
Figure 2 thermo-gravimetric analysis of
HDPE (left) differential thermal analysis
of HDPE (right)
RESULTS
• activation energy activation gotten from
the slope is 4.79kJ/mol and a pre
exponential factor of 5.91E-03 High
density polyethylene (HDPE) activation
energy, which was gotten from the
slope of the graph 1.94E-04kJ/mol with
a pre exponential factor of 9.94.
• .
Figure 4 The Coats and Redfern method (left) while the
right presents the Arrhenius kinetic regression
RESULTS
• observed activation energy for the overlap of the
organic matter of oil shale and high density poly
ethylene decomposition in the mixture was
4.79kJ/mol and 1.94E-04kJ/mol. This is lower than
that of the oil shale which is 75.5kJ/mol
CONCLUSIONS
The first stage, obtained in the temperature range of 28-316.41 oC. It is attributed to the departure of
moisture from the sample. The second step is between the ranges of 316.41 to 481.47 oC, this is
attributed to the overlapping of the organic matter in the Lokpanta oil shale sample and plastic
degradation. The third step lies between 481.47 and 887.44 oC, which corresponds to the degradation of
mineral matter of oil shale content in the blend.
HDPE acted as a catalyst in the pyrolysis of the oil shale in the mixture, decreasing the activation energy
by the direct proportionality of the maximum temperature which is 407.49 oC.
the energy required to carry out the process necessary to obtain oil from oil shale is reduced by the
addition of HDPE
REFERENCES
Sun, Y. H., Bai, F. T., Lü, X. S., Li, Q., Liu, Y. M., Guo, M. Y., ... & Liu, B. C. (2015). A novel
energy-efficient pyrolysis process: self-pyrolysis of oil shale triggered by topochemical
heat in a horizontal fixed bed. Scientific reports, 5, 8290
Lai, D., Zhang, G., & Xu, G. (2017). Characterization of oil shale pyrolysis by solid
heat carrier in moving bed with internals. Fuel Processing Technology, 158, 191-198
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING.