J Component review on

Influence of thread type and

pitch on the osseointegration
phenomenon

1
 Contents
• Introduction
• Literature survey
• Objectives of the project
• Methodology
• Work done
• Work to be done
• References

2
 Introduction
• Osseointegration defined as direct functional linkage of the implant
surface and surrounding bone. It is crucial for the long-term success
of dental implant.

• FACTORS INFLUENCING OSSEOINTEGRATION

BEHAVIOR

 Thread shape of abutment screw

Pitch of the thread of abutment screw

Tissue reaction at tissue –implant interface
Surface roughness and topography

3
Stages in implantation

(a)Gum tissue is removed and implant is inserted in the bone.

(b) Osseointegration takes place for 4-6 months.
(c) Attaching the abutment to the implant.
(d) Placing a prosthetic tooth on abutment.

4
 Literature Survey
Sr. Author & Year of Publication Important findings
No.
1. Ramesh chowdhary et al (2013) • Eight thread patterns are analyzed with same
boundary conditions and load.

• V-shape thread has shown very low stress

among all the thread shape for axial loading.

2. Maryam Geramizadeh et al(2018) • Sensitivity study of various threads was

done

• V –shape with micro threads found to be

optimum

3. D. Kurniawan et al (2012) • ANOVA Table Formation

5
 Objective
• Comparison among various factors affecting osseointegration
phenomenon by using DOAE approach.

6
Methodology

7
 Work done
1.Factorial Design
a)Stress Observed in Cortical
Interaction Plot for Stress (Cortical)
Data Means
225 Bone
Type
200 1
2
3
175

150
Mean

125
Contour Plot of Stress (Cortical) vs Bone Type, D.O.O
100 3.0
Stress
(Cortical)
75 < 80
80 – 100
2.5 100 – 120
50 120 – 140
25 50 75 100 140 – 160
160 – 180
D.O.O Bone Type 180 – 200
> 200
2.0

1.5

8
1.0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
D.O.O
Work done
1.Factorial Design
b)Strain Observed in Cortical

9
 Work done
1.Factorial Design
c)Stress Observed in Cancellous

10
 Work done
1.Factorial Design
d)Strain Observed in Cancellous

11
 Work done
2.Regression Analysis
a)Stress Observed in Cortical

Contour Plot of STRESS (CORTICAL) vs BONE TYPE, D O O

3.0
STRESS
(CORTICAL)
< 50
50 – 75
2.5 75 – 100
100 – 125
125 – 150
150 – 175

BONE TYPE
> 175
2.0

1.5

1.0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
DOO 12
 Work done
2.Regression Analysis
b)Strain Observed in Cortical

Contour Plot of STRAIN (CORTICAL) vs D.O.O, BONE TYPE

100
STRAIN
(CORTICAL)
90 < 0.5
0.5 – 1.0
1.0 – 1.5
80 1.5 – 2.0
2.0 – 2.5
2.5 – 3.0
70
> 3.0
D.O.O

60

50

40

30

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

13
BONE TYPE
 Work done
2.Regression Analysis
c)Stress Observed in Cancellous

Contour Plot of STRESS (CANCELLOUS) vs D.O.O, BONE TYPE

100
STRESS
(CANCELLOUS)
90 < 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
80 5 – 6
6 – 7
> 7
70
D.O.O

60

50

40

30

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

BONE TYPE 14
Work done
2.Regression Analysis
d)Strain Observed in Cancellous

Contour Plot of STRAIN (CANCELLOUS) vs D.O.O, BONE TYPE

100
STRAIN
(CANCELLOUS)
90 < 2
2 – 4
4 – 6
80 6 – 8
8 – 10
10 – 12
70
12 – 14
D.O.O

> 14
60

50

40

30

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

15
BONE TYPE
 References
• D. Kurniawan et al ‘Finite element analysis of bone–implant
biomechanics : refinement through featuring various osseointegration
conditions.’ Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012; 41: 1090–1096.
• Ramesh Chowdhary et al ‘Evaluation of Stress Pattern Generated
Through Various Thread Designs of Dental Implants Loaded in a
Condition of Immediately After Placement and on Osseointegration
An FEA Study’ implant dentistry / volume 22, number 1 2013.
• M.M.Gallas et al ‘ Three dimensional numerical simulation of dental
implant as orthodontic anchorage’European journal of orthodontics
27,2005,12-16

16