Role of The Principal • People have long been interested in the work of managers, not to mention whether or not their work makes a difference (Heck & Hallinger, 2005). • Study of educational leadership evolved in last century to know impact of principals on student learning (Leithwood, Leonard & Sharratt, 1998; Sergiovanni, 1998). Role of The Principal • Educational management was not keeping up with the needs of the educational community (Moore, 1964). • Educational management was “faulty, unimaginative, and out of step with community desires (Heck & Hallinger, 2005). • No evidence of progress on important issues was evident in researches from 1950 to 1960 (Erickson, 1967). Role of The Principal • More things change the more they remain same (Bridges, 1982). • Paradigm shifted from exploring actions and processes of educational leaders to results (Bossert, Dwyer, Rowan, & Lee, 1982). • During 1970s through 1990s two main views of principal leadership became widespread: instructional or transformational (Marks & Printy, 2003). Role of The Principal • Instructional leadership – principal as the educational expert focusing on curriculum, instruction, staff development, and supervision (Leithwood, 1994; Leithwood & Duke, 1998). • Transformational leadership focusing on problem finding, problem solving, collaboration with stakeholders with the goal of improving organizational performance (Marks & Printy, 2003). Role of The Principal • In late 1990s that the language shifted from “management to leadership (Bush, 2008). • Paradigm of research shifts from studying influence of principals on not only processes but on outcomes or products, impact on student learning (Hallinger & Heck, 1996;Leithwood, 1994; Marzano, Waters and McNulty, 2003). • At the school level all change flows through the principal’s office (Murphy et al. 2009). Role of The Principal • Focus is on developing leadership of those within the organization, whether this is referred to as distributed leadership (Hargreaves, 2006; Hargreaves & Fink, 2006; Murphy et l., 2009; Spillance, 2006),
building capacity for leadership (Slater, 2008), balanced leadership (Marzano et al., 2005), organizational leadership (Leithwood et al., 1998), principal as professional developer (DuFour & Berkey, 1995; Lindstorm & Speck, 2004). Leadership • Lambert (1998) suggested a framework to understand leadership:- – Leadership is not trait theory; leadership and leader are not the same. – Leadership is about learning that leads to constructive change. – Everyone has the potential and right to work as a leader. – Leading is a shared endeavor. – Leadership requires the redistribution of power and authority. 1 Tenet of Framework st
• Leadership is not trait theory; leadership
and leader are not the same – Leadership is not confined to one person i.e. principal (Fullan, 2005) and leadership emerges from different individuals based on the situations in which they are placed (Hargreaves, 2006; Hargreaves & Fink, 2006; Murphy et al., 2009; Spillane, 2006). – Development of leadership skills and capacity in the entire staff is to create a collaborative environment (Fullan, 2005). 1st Tenet of Framework • Expectations from Principal – Believing in the capacity of all staff of all staff to serve in leadership capacities (Lambert, 2003) – He / She must know how to distribute leadership and have the repertoire of skills for doing it (Hargreaves, 2006; Hargreaves & Fink, 2006; Murphy et al., 2009) – he/she must know of structures, systems, and processes to distribute the work of leadership throughout the staff, and then successfully implement those structures, systems, and processes (Marzano et al., 2005; Mullen & Hutinger, 2008; Murphy et al., 2009). 2 Tenet of Framework nd
• Leadership is about learning that leads
to constructive change. – There are no easy answers, no silver bullet (Fullan, 2001; Sparks, 2005). – Rather leadership is about facilitating learning and seeking out adaptive solutions to adaptive problems (Heifetz, 1994). – This requires humility in one’s approach, and a constant strive to improve (Fullan, 2001). 2 Tenet of Framework nd
– Posture of learning is critical to effective
leadership (Lambert, 1998). – Deming (1986) identified key difference between leadership and management is that leadership is about finding and meeting needs of everyone, whereas management is about accommodating the unique individual needs of each person – Thus leadership is working on the system and its continuous improvement by meeting needs. 2 Tenet of Framework nd
– Authoritarian situations arise, but for the
most part leadership requires attitude of humility, learning, high expectations and persistence (Blase & Blase, 1999; Fullan, 2001; NSDC, 2003; Schmoker, 2006). – Principal must be knowledgeable about learning and must possess skills necessary to create an atmosphere of learning (Schmoker, 2006). 3 Tenet of Framework rd
• Everyone has the potential and right to work
as a leader. Assuming that – The staff have the capacity to work as leaders (Pounder et al., 1995) and they are entitled to work of leadership (DePree, 1989). – Leadership playing field is leveled, if you will – The leader’s function is to provide opportunities for teachers to work together in self-managing teams to improve their own instructions and learning, thus leading instruction. 3rd Tenet of Framework – Teachers must be grouped in effective teams for effective collaboration (NSDC, 2003).
– Designated leaders must believe in the
inherent ability of teachers to serve in leadership capacities (Pounder et al., 1995). – Opportunities for staff involvement in important decisions are provided, encouraged, and expected (Marks & Printy, 2003). 3 Tenet of Framework rd
– Leadership teams are empowered to
make decisions (NSDC, 2003). – Risk taking is encouraged (Marzano et al., 2005) – Protocols are in place to ensure that leadership opportunities rotate between and among staff (NSDC, 2003). 3rd Tenet of Framework • To do so expectations from leader are:- – Trusting faculty to behave professionally and then believe in the power of collaboration (DeFour et al., 2005). – Believe that decisions arrived at by the collaborative teams are correct and then work for implementation (NSDC, 2003). – Knowledge required includes effective grouping of faculty, and protocols for use in specific situations (Easton, 2004). – Skills of encouraging, providing, and effective collaboration (NSDC, 2003). 4 Tenet of Framework th
• Leading is a shared endeavor, all
working together – Collective work, collaborative environment, and collegiality – If not sharing in the processes and practices of school then it is not a shared endeavor and it is not building capacity for leading (Leithwood et al., 1998; Youngs & King, 2002). 4 Tenet of Framework th
• Look at this quote highlighting importance
of shared endeavor – Leadership is not a solo act. In the thousands of personal-best leadership cases we studied, we have yet to encounter a single example of extraordinary achievement that occurred without the active involvement and support of many people. Fostering collaboration is the route to high performance (Kouzes & Posner, 1996). 4 Tenet of Framework th
– In schools we don’t need charismatic
leaders (Gronn, 1996) but those who understands the importance and need of collaboration and create collaborative environment are more successful in longer run (Murphy et al., 2009; Slater, 2008)
– Improving school is about working together
for success not about individuals performing miracles (Gronn, 1996). 5 Tenet of Framework th
• Leadership requires redistribution of
power and authority – The masses are now in charge – whether through formal channels or unsolicited venues (Hargreaves & Fink, 2006). – Designated leader must consider how power and authority can and should be redistributed; otherwise, it redistributes itself with typically unwanted and undesirable consequences (Murphy et al., 2009). 5 Tenet of Framework th
– Skills of successful principals associated
with redistribution of power (Marzano et al., 2005) • Providing opportunities for staff to be involved in developing school policies • Providing opportunities for staff input on all important decisions and • Using leadership teams in decision making 5 Tenet of Framework th
– Principals in professional learning
communities regard themselves as leaders of leaders rather than leaders of followers and broadening teachers’ leadership becomes one of their priorities (DuFour et al., 2005). – Rightful title of instructional leader belongs with the teacher and the principal is a leaders of leaders (Mark & Printy, 2003). Can we say? School leadership is a team spirit (Fullan, 2003)