Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MILLION BOND
Parex include to the three major banks in Latvia, based on the above
data it can be seen that the Parex LDR ratio compared to its
competitors is very low even under the standard, with a composition of
46.6% LDR Parex lending remains low so that the burden of high
interest to a third party.
ANALYSIS (cont)
YOY Growth
Interest 2004 2005 Yoy Growth
Interest Income 58,518 78,899 34.8%
Interest expense 19,848 32,425 63.4%
Total 38,670 46,474 20.2%
Based on that table, its can be indicated that YOY growth in net
interest income from 2004 to 2005 was only 20%, it is in the trigger by
its high-interest expense growth of 63.4%.
ANALYSIS (cont)
Comparation based on Income Structure
Comp (%)
Income Structure 2004 2005 Yoy Growth
2004 2005
Net Interest Income 38,670 46,474 20.18% 53.2% 51.7%
Fee Based Income 18,823 25,734 36.72% 25.9% 28.6%
Trading 13,227 15,484 17.06% 18.2% 17.2%
Others 1,920 2,135 11.20% 2.6% 2.4%
Market Share of
Deposits Market Share
Hansabanka
ofSEB
Loans
Latvijas
Unibanka
Hansabanka Parex Banka AS NORD/LB
15% SEB Latvijas
4%
30% 13% 5% Latvija
Unibanka 34% AS Rietumu
17%
Parex Banka Banka
31% 20% 32%
AS
NORD/LB
Latvija
As at the end of the first half 2006, Parexbanka was the second largest
commercial bank inLatvia by deposits with 18.0% market share. The market
share in terms of assets comprised16.2%, in terms of loans –11.8% and by capital
and reserves – 14.8%.
ANALYSIS (cont)
Analysis of Earnings