Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PR
D-
3
Type of Cross-sectional study
Type of Cross-sectional study
◦ Descriptive Cross Sectional Study
◦ Analytical Cross Sectional Study
◦Or Both
PR
D-
4
Descriptive Cross Sectional Study
Descriptive Cross Sectional Study
At descriptive level, it yields information about a single
variable, or about each of number of separate
variables in a study population
Analytical Cross Sectional Study
Analytical Cross Sectional Study
At analytic level, it provides information about
the
presence and strength of associations between
variables, permitting testing of hypothesis
Structure of
Cross-Sectional Study
Disease/Outcome
Risk factor
Analytical study
(Cohort, Case-Control And Cross-sectional )
Cohort
Exposure Outcome
Risk Factor Effect
Case-Control
Past Future
Cross-Sectional
Exposure & Outcome
Steps in Cross-sectional study
PR
D-
9
Specifications:
Designing inclusion and exclusion criteria
PR
D-
10
Cross-Sectional Study
Advantages
Cheap and quick studies.
Data is frequently available through current records or
statistics.
Ideal for generating new hypothesis.
PR
D-
11
Cross-Sectional Study
Advantages
Good design for hypothesis generation
Can estimate overall and specific disease prevalence
and sometimes rates
Can estimate exposure proportions in the population
Can study multiple exposures or multiple outcomes or
diseases
Cross-Sectional Study
Disadvantages
The importance of the relationship between the cause
PR
D-
13
Cross-Sectional Study
Disadvantages
Impractical for rare diseases
Not a useful type of study for establishing causal
relationships
Confounding is difficult to control
No control over sample size for each exposure by
disease subclass
Cross-Sectional Study
Disadvantages
Problems with temporal sequence of data
hard to decide when disease was actually acquired
disease may cure the exposure
miss diseases still in latent period
recall of previous exposure may be faulty
Selection Sample
Population
Selected Sample
select people from the electoral role and invite them to complete a
questionnaire.
In this way the response rate is known and non-responders can
be identified.
However, the electoral role itself is not an entirely accurate
Questionnaire Interview
Cheap Expensive
Low response rate High response rate
Large sample size Small sample size
Cross sectional studies for prevalence
• Is not defined by a time interval and is therefore
not a rate.
• It may be defined as the number of cases of a
disease (problem) that exist in a defined
population at a specified point in time.
Example : Cross sectional studies for prevalence
Example Table
Cross sectional studies for prevalence
Cross sectional studies for cause
Example : Cross sectional studies for cause
How to run a cross sectional study
Formulate the research question (s) and choose the
sample population.
Decide what variables of the study population are
relevant to the research question.
A method for contacting sample subjects must be
devised and then implemented.
In this way the data are collected and can then be
analyzed.
Summary
Cross sectional studies look at each subject at one point in time
only.
Subjects are selected without regard to the outcome of interest.
Less expensive
They are the best way to determine prevalence.
Quick
The principal summary statistic of cross sectional studies is the
odds ratio.
Weaker evidence of causality than cohort studies.
Inaccurate when studying rare conditions.
Q&A
Thank you