Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Space in Urban Design
Space in Urban Design
DESIGN
THE ART OF CREATING
GREAT SPACES
•Great public spaces are the living room of the city - the place
where people come together to enjoy the city and each other.
Public spaces make high quality life in the city possible - they
form the stage and backdrop to the drama of life. Public spaces
range from grand central plazas and squares, to small, local
neighborhood parks.
•The combination of beautiful architecture with great public
space creates the most beautiful places to live - places that
express a life of richness and tradition, and act as a setting for life
to happen.
TRADITIONS OF THOUGHT IN URBAN
DESIGN
City Beautiful Movement
•the City Beautiful movement was meant to shape the American urban landscape
in the manner of those in Europe, which were primarily designed in the Beaux-
Arts aesthetic. Burnham especially thought of the movement as a mechanism by
which the United States could establish visible and permanent ties to European
Classical traditions. His opponents, Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright among
them, wanted to avoid borrowing from and outright replication of European
design and instead invent a new and truly American style.
•The City Beautiful movement emerged at a time in U.S. history when the
country’s urban population first began to outnumber its rural population. Most
city dwellers perceived that cities were ugly, congested, dirty, and unsafe. As
cities grew—an increasingly rapid condition enhanced by an influx of immigrants
at the end of the 19th century—public space was being usurped. With increased
congestion, city dwellers needed open outdoor areas for recreation as they never
had before. In addition, the chaotic approach to sanitation, pollution, and traffic
found in most big American cities affected rich and poor alike, which is how the
City Beautiful movement gained both financial and social support.
VISUAL ARTISTIC
TRADITION
• The visual-artistic tradition reflects an earlier,
more architectural and narrower
understanding of urban design.
Predominantly product-oriented, it tended to
concentrate on the visual qualities and
aesthetic experience of urban spaces, rather
than the myriad cultural, social, economic,
political, and spatial factors and processes
contributing to successful urban places.
SOCIAL USAGE
TRADITION
• Jarvis contrasts the visual-artistic tradition with the
social usage tradition, which emphasises the way in
which people use space and encompasses issues of
perceptions and sense-of-place. Identifying Kevin
Lynch as a key proponent of this approach, Jarvis
(1980: 58) highlights how Lynch shifted the focus of
urban design in two ways: first, in terms of the
appreciation of the urban environment – rejecting the
notion that this was an exclusive and elitist concern,
Lynch emphasised that pleasure in urban places was a
commonplace experience – and, second, in terms of
the object of study – instead of examining the physical
and material form of urban places, Lynch (1960: 3)
suggested examining people’s perceptions and mental
images.
THE PLACE MAKING
TRADITION
•a place-making tradition of urban design has
emerged – a tradition rooted in large part in
the work of the urban design pioneers.
Synthesising the two earlier traditions,
contemporary urban design is simultaneously
concerned with the design of urban places as
physical/aesthetic entities and as behavioural
settings – that is, with the ‘hard city’ of
buildings and spaces and the ‘soft city’ of
people and activities.
DOCUMENT IN THE CITY- THE
SYSTEM OF DESIGN AND
PROCESS OF PRESENTATION