DESIGN OF VARIOUS TUNING METHODS

FOR A BREATHING PROCESS

Presented By

T.ANITHA, Dr. G. GOPU, A.SINDHUJA,

K.KAVIMALAR,
Assistant professor, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College.
Professor, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College.
PG Scholar, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College.
PG Scholar, Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College.

Paper ID: ICSMDI186

11 May 2021 SREC - EIE 1
 AIM

The Aim of the proposed work is to implement various tuning

methods for the breathing process and by using these tuning methods it
gives a better result when compared to traditional controllers.

OBJECTIVES
 To compare a different types of tuning methods for breathing process.
 To find a finer tuning method for breathing process.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 2

 MOTIVATION

 The main motive of this process is to increase the ventilation pressure for
the one who is suffering from insufficient of breathing.

 This proposed tuning process helps the patients to breathe sufficiently by

increasing the pressure when their breathing pressure is low.

COMPARATIVE STUDY

Existing Method Proposed Method

AUTO TUNNG METHOD
PID
CONTROLLER TYREUS LUYBEN METHOD
ZIEGLER-NICHOLS
METHOD

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 3

 PID CONTROLLER

 PID stands for proportional integral derivative and is a type Pressure, flow,
temperature, and speeds are some of the process variables that are controlled
by this system in industrial applications.
 To regulate all of the process variables, this controller employs a control loop
feedback system
 A PID controller holds the output at zero error between the method variable
and the set point / desired output by using closed-loop operations.

AUTO TUNING METHOD

 Ultimate gain and period can be obtained without trial and error procedure.
 It is just set of tools to automate the procedure of finding a set of parameter
 These methods are easy to use and take a short period of time to compute.
 PID controllers' auto-tuning technology successfully overcomes the time-
consuming limitations of human tuning.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 4

 ZIEGLER-NICHOLS METHOD TYREUS LUYBEN METHOD

 Fast recovery from disturbance but

 The Tyreus-Luyben a technique is
leads to oscillatory response.
somewhat comparable to the
 ¼ decay ratio as design criterion
Ziegler–Nichols procedure, the final
(stability condition)
controller settings are distinct.
 Actually developed for fast set point
 An improvement for Ziegler Nichols
tracking, so they are really too
close loop to make a response less
aggressive for process control.
oscillatory.
 Trial and error procedure find Ku and Pu
 More robust to imprecise model.
CONTROLLER
kp TI Td Table
Gives1: better disturbance
Controller response.
tuning parameters
PID Ku/1.7 Pu /1.2 Pu/8

PI Ku/2.2 Pu/2 -

P Ku/2 - -
Table 1: Calculation of Kp, Ki and Kd in
Table 2: Controller tuning parameters
Closed Loop
May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 5
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

 In the proposed method the simulations are carried out for the breathing
support machine.
 The results are achieved for various tuning methods like Ziegler Nichols,
Auto tune, Tyreus Luyben.
 The simulations were done for various pressure ranges like 25, 40, 50 psi.
The PID controller streaks less effort to produce gain in the process.
 When this PID controller can be used along with the tuning techniques it
yields better response.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 6

 RESPONSE OF PID CONTROLLER

Fig 1. Combined response without controller at 25psi

When the pressure is 25psi at without controller in Fig.1 the volume is 0.158ml and
the flow is 83ml/sec.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 7

 RESPONSE OF AUTO TUNING METHOD

Fig 2.Combined response of Auto tune at 25psi

When using the controller of auto tuning method the pressure is at 25psi in
Fig.2 then the pressure is increased to 57psi and the volume is to 2.75ml and
the flow is 0.7 ml/sec.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 8

 RESPONSE OF TYREUS LUYBEN METHOD

Fig 3. Combined Tyreus Luyben at 25psi

When using Tyreus Luyben in Fig.3 for controlling when the pressure is 25psi, then the
pressure increased to 200psi and the volume is 5ml and the flow is at 0.8ml/sec.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 9

 RESPONSE OF ZIEGLER NICHOLS METHOD

Fig 4. Combined Ziegler Nichols at 25 psi

Using Ziegler Nichols method for tuning in Fig.4 when the pressure is at 25psi then
the pressure increased to 100psi and the volume is 10ml and the flow is at
0.75ml/sec.

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 10

 CONCLUSION
 The simulation result shows the response of pressure, volume and flow of the
breathing process.
 The tuning were done for pressure, volume and flow with Ziegler Nichols,
Tyreus Luyben, Auto tune simulations at various pressure like 25, 40, 50 psi.
 Among these methods from table 3, it is observed that the Tyreus Luyben
method shows the best response where compared to the other tuned controllers.

FUTURE SCOPE
 In Future, along with Genetic Algorithm (GA) Tyreus Luyben tuning method
can be more effective breathing process.
 GA’s are ideal for solving optimization problems.
 The Genetic Algorithm (GA) is a search-based optimization technique based on
genetics and natural selection principles

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 11

 Comparative analysis of PID, Auto Tune, Tyreus Luyben, Ziegler
Nichols for breathing process

Ziegler Tyreus
Pressure Without
Parameters Auto tune Nichols Luyben
Range controller
method method

Pressure 50 115 200 500

50 Volume 0.31 5.6 20 10
Flow 165 1.3 1.65 1.65
Pressure 40 90 40 200
40 Volume 0.25 4.4 1.9 10
Flow 136 1.1 2.25 1.4
Pressure 25 57 100 200
25 Volume 0.158 2.75 10 5
Flow 83 0.7 0.75 0.8

Table 3: Comparative analysis of PID, Auto Tune, Tyreus Luyben, Ziegler Nichols for breathing
process
May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 12
 REFERENCES

1. Anitha, T., Gopu, G., Nagarajapandian, M., &Devan, P. A. M.: Hybrid Fuzzy PID
Controller for Pressure Process Control Application. In:2019 IEEE Student
Conference on Research and Development, pp. 129-133.IEEE (2019)
2. Ashraf, A., Zaher, Mounib Khanafer,: A Systematic Approach to Model and
Simulate Controlling Industrial Processes with Uncertainties. In: IEEE International
System Conference, pp.247-252 (2017)
3. Bingi, K., Ibrahim, R., Karsiti, M. N., Hassan, S. M., &Harindran, V. R.: Fractional-
order PI controllers for real-time control of pressure plant. In : 5th International
Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies,pp. 972-977. IEEE,
(2018)
4. David Banjerdpongchai, Tat Angwattanapanich,: Design and Implementation of
Wiener Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Pressure Control Loop. In, IEEE
System International Annual Conference, pp.143-149 (2014)
5. Prabakaran, M., Naveen Kumar, P.: Design of Model Predictive Controller for
Industrial Pressure Process. In :International Journal of Engineering Sciences and
Computing, Vol.6, No.5, pp.5724-5727 (2016)

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 13

 THANK YOU

May 11, 2021 SREC - EIE 14