1. The document discusses the relationship between social science and ecclesiology, specifically critiques of ecclesiology from social science and ideological perspectives.
2. It argues that questions regarding church structure, ministry, authority, and the universal vs local church require theological positions with true explanatory power, which may require incorporating social science insights after reorienting the social sciences.
3. The document examines the history of using social sciences in ecclesiology from Protestant and Catholic theologians and addresses issues like the theological biases within social sciences and the need for conversion in both social sciences and theology.
1. The document discusses the relationship between social science and ecclesiology, specifically critiques of ecclesiology from social science and ideological perspectives.
2. It argues that questions regarding church structure, ministry, authority, and the universal vs local church require theological positions with true explanatory power, which may require incorporating social science insights after reorienting the social sciences.
3. The document examines the history of using social sciences in ecclesiology from Protestant and Catholic theologians and addresses issues like the theological biases within social sciences and the need for conversion in both social sciences and theology.
1. The document discusses the relationship between social science and ecclesiology, specifically critiques of ecclesiology from social science and ideological perspectives.
2. It argues that questions regarding church structure, ministry, authority, and the universal vs local church require theological positions with true explanatory power, which may require incorporating social science insights after reorienting the social sciences.
3. The document examines the history of using social sciences in ecclesiology from Protestant and Catholic theologians and addresses issues like the theological biases within social sciences and the need for conversion in both social sciences and theology.
Ideological Critiques of Ecclesiology Neil Ormerod In The Oxford Handbook of Ecclesiology, edited by Paul Avis (2018) Social Science and Ideological Critiques of Ecclesiology
• What is the thesis statement?
Questions of church order, the validity of different forms of ministry, notions of authority, and the relationship between the universal and the local church have a pressing urgency.
Social Science Any lasting resolution to such questions must rest
and Ideological Critiques on theological positions which have genuine of Ecclesiology explanatory power.
It is difficult to see how this can be achieved
without some input from the social sciences, though this might require considerable reorientation of those sciences as they are currently constituted. History of the use of social sciences in ecclesiology: from Protestant to Catholic theologians
1. social science has its theological perspective
What is the 2. Social science should be used in theological
methodology of ecclesiology: Lonergan’s view arguments 3. Social Science, and Theology: the need of conversion for incorporation
Conclusion: Effective, Constitutive, and Cognitive
Meaning — Ecclesiology as ‘Ideological’ or as the explanatory power 1. social • the relationship of the social sciences to ecclesiology can never be theologically science has its neutral. theological • Different theological and metaphysical perspective options underline quite different forms/aproaches of social sciences, such as positivist, functionalist, conflictualist, and symbolic interactionist. 2. Social sciences could be used in Theological method consists of two distinct phases: theological methodology of • positive phase which seeks to recover that which has been handed down from the ecclesiology: past. Lonergan’s view • normative phase which having learnt from the past, seeks to mediate the normative meanings and values of the tradition into the future. *Phương pháp luận của Lonergan ○ Quan sát – (1) nghiên cứu --> (8) truyền thông - communicative ○ Tìm hiểu – (2) chú giải --> (7) hệ thống hoá - systematic ○ Phán đoán – (3) lịch sử --> (6) giáo thuyết -- doctrine ○ Quyết định – (4) biện chứng --> (5) nền tảng - fundamental Normative phase • Foundational issues – implications for doctrines – systematic ecclesiology • ‘How can one work out a systematic ecclesiology without working out first such terms as “individual,” “community,” “society,” “meaning,” “change,” “structure,” “institution,” “relationship,” and so on, and the various relationships, or at least types of relationships, that can obtain among these those terms?’ (69–70). (Komonchak) 3. Social • questions of moral and intellectual Science, and conversion are also pertinent as they impact Theology: the on how one conceives of the social sciences and of their relationship to theology. need of • Social sciences that attempt to exclude conversion for questions of value will not only be of little incorporation value theologically, they will distort our understanding of the social order. • Social science needs to convert to accept the terminal values of theology in the social life. • Theology need to convert to accept the use of terminal value in the society. Conclusion: • Constitutive meaning recognizes the fact that our Effective, human world is a world of meaning, that our institutions and cultures are in fact constituted by Constitutive, and meaning. Through shared meanings we create Cognitive Meaning community, including the community we call the — Ecclesiology as church. (meaning) ‘Ideological’ or as • The effective function of meaning seeks to bring the explanatory about a new reality in the world constituted and power mediated by meaning. Effective meaning motivates and challenges us, through envisaging new elements in that world of meaning. (motivate to change) • The cognitive function of meaning seeks to understand and affirm truth, what is in fact the case. (the truth and the fact) Conclusion: Effective, • Ecclesiological discourse is more concerned with the constitutive and Constitutive, effective functions of meaning than with and Cognitive the cognitive function. Meaning — Ecclesiology as • Ex: the Church as Communio (Synod 1985) ‘Ideological’ or was ‘the central and fundamental idea of the Council’s documents’. The notion of as the communio fits firmly into a functionalist explanatory sociological stance with key values of power social harmony and stability. Questions of church order, the validity of different forms of ministry, notions of authority, and the relationship between the universal and the local church have a pressing urgency.
Social Science Any lasting resolution to such questions must rest
and Ideological Critiques on theological positions which have genuine of Ecclesiology explanatory power.
It is difficult to see how this can be achieved
without some input from the social sciences, though this might require considerable reorientation of those sciences as they are currently constituted.
Wesley J. Wildman - Religious Philosophy As Multidisciplinary Comparative Inquiry - Envisioning A Future For The Philosophy of Religion - SUNY Press (2010)