Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sampling: by Prof. Dr. Farooq Anwar
Sampling: by Prof. Dr. Farooq Anwar
Issues of Precision refers to how close our estimate is to the true population
characteristic. Usually, we would estimate the population
Precision and parameter to fall within a range, based on the sample estimate. For
example, let us say that from a study of a simple random sample of
Confidence in 50 of the total 300 employees in a workshop, we find that the
average daily production rate per person is 50 pieces of a particular
Determining product. We might then (by doing certain calculations, as we shall
see later) be able to say that the true average daily production of the
Sample Size product (μ) would lie anywhere between 40 and 60 for the
population of employees in the workshop.
Confidence
Whereas precision denotes how close we estimate the population
parameter based on the sample statistic, confidence denotes how
certain we are that our estimates will really hold true for the
population. In the previous example of production rate, we know we
are more precise when we estimate the true mean production (μ) to
fall somewhere between 45 and 55 pieces, than somewhere
between 40 and 60.
It is now possible to see how both sampling design and the sample
Importance of size are important to establish the representativeness of the sample
for generalizability. If the appropriate sampling design is not used, a
Sampling large sample size will not, in itself, allow the findings to be
generalized to the population. Likewise, unless the sample size is
Design and adequate for the desired level of precision and confidence, no
Sampling Size sampling design, however sophisticated, can be useful to the
researcher in meeting the objectives of the study.
Roscoe (1975) proposes the following rules of thumb for
determining sample size:
1. Sample sizes larger than 30 and less than 500 are appropriate for
most research.
2. Where samples are to be broken into subsamples; (male/females,
juniors/seniors, etc.), a minimum sample size of 30 for each category
Rule of Thumb is necessary.
3. In multivariate research (including multiple regression analyses),
the sample size should be several times (preferably 10 times or
more) as large as the number of variables in the study.
4. For simple experimental research with tight experimental
controls (matched pairs, etc.), successful research is possible with
samples as small as 10 to 20 in size.
In qualitative studies, only small samples of individuals, groups, or
events are invariably chosen, in view of the in-depth nature of the
study. Obviously, it is not possible to engage in intensive
examination of all the factors—central and peripheral—with a
sample of, say, 300. That will entail huge costs and energy
Sampling in expenditure.
For the above reason, qualitative studies use small samples, which
Qualitative means that the generalizability of the findings is very restricted.
Studies Data analytic procedures will be mostly of the nonparametric type
(explained in Chapter 12), and as noted, external validity will be
low. In qualitative studies, it is possible to use any of the sampling
designs discussed in this chapter, but if the purpose of the study is
merely to explore and try to understand phenomena, a
convenience sample is almost always used.
We can summarize the factors affecting decisions on sample size
as (1) the extent of precision desired (the confidence interval); (2)
the acceptable risk in predicting that level of precision (confidence
level); (3) the amount of variability in the population itself; (4) the
Review of cost and time constraints; and, in some cases, (5) the size of the
population itself.
Sample Size As a rule of thumb, sample sizes between 30 and 500 could be
Decisions effective depending on the type of sampling design used and the
research question investigated. Qualitative studies typically use
small sample sizes because of their intensive nature. When
qualitative studies are undertaken for exploratory purposes, the
sampling design will be convenience sampling.
Awareness of sampling designs and sample size helps managers
to understand why a particular method of sampling is used by
researchers. It also facilitates understanding of the cost
implications of different designs, and the trade-off between
Managerial precision and confidence vis-á-vis the costs. This enables
managers to understand the risk they take in implementing
Relevance changes based on the results of the research study. While reading
journal articles, this knowledge also helps managers to assess the
generalizability of the findings and analyse the implications of
trying out the recommendations made therein in their own
system.
Thank You Any Questions?