Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perhitungan Proses
Pembakaran
11 Introduction
22 Combustion
Sulfur is usually a relatively unimportant contributor to the energy released, but it can
be a significant cause of pollution and corrosion problem.
Fuel
Oxidizer
where a, b, c denote the moles of O2, CO2, and H2O, respectively, each per mole of
CH4.
►Applying conservation of mass to carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen:
C: 1 = b H: 4 = 2c O: 2a = 2b + c
or on a mass basis:
mass of air
AF
mass of fuel
► Conversion between these values is accomplished using the molecular weights of air,
Mair, and fuel, Mfuel,
Assumption
1. Each mole of oxygen in the combustion air is accompanied by 3.76 moles of
nitrogen
2. The nitrogen is inert
3. Combustion is complete
28.97
AF 89.25 kg air
22.64 kg fuel
114 .224
CASE OF COMBUSTION
Ethanol (C2H5OH) is burned with air to give products with the dry molar analysis 3.16%
CO2, 16.6% CO, 80.24% N2. Determine the balanced chemical reaction.
►Basing the solution for convenience on 100 moles of dry products, the reaction equation
reads:
The specific enthalpy of carbon dioxide can be calculated : Since carbon and oxygen are stable
. . . . elements, at standard state hC hO 0 2
Q CV nC n O2 Q CV .
hCO2 .
.
hC .
hO2 .
hC hO2 Q CV
n CO2 n CO2 n CO2 n CO2 , therefore : hCO .
2
n CO2
The specific enthalpy of a compound at a state other than the standard state is found by adding
the specific enthalpy change as below
h T , P h fo h T , P h Tref , Pref h o
f h
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
That is, the enthalpy of a compound is composed of
o
►hf associated with the formation of the compound from its elements. This is obtained
from Tables A-25 and A-25E.
► associated with the change in state from the standard state to the state where
temperature is T and the pressure is p. Since this term is a difference at fixed
composition, it can be evaluated from the ideal gas tables, steam tables, or other
tables, as appropriate.
►The enthalpy of formation concept enables the control volume energy rate balance to be
implemented for engineering applications involving combustion, including
►Calculation of heating values
►Calculation of adiabatic flame temperature
►The following example provides a specific illustration showing use of the enthalpy of
formation.
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
For reacting systems, the methods used for evaluating specific enthalpy and specific
entropy differ fundamentally from the practices used thus far in nonreacting
applications. This brings in two new concepts:
►Enthalpy of formation
►Absolute entropy
H2
H2O
O2
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
H2
H2 + ½O2 → H2O H2 O
O2
To apply an energy balance to the control volume, we might think of using enthalpy
data from the steam tables for liquid water and from Table A-23 for the gases.
However, since those tables use arbitrary datums to assign enthalpy values, they
must be used only to determine differences in enthalpy between two states,.
For the case under consideration, H2 and O2 enter the control volume but do not exit, and
liquid water exits but does not enter. Accordingly, enthalpy differences from inlet to exit
do not arise for each of these substances when applying an energy balance to the control
volume. For each it is necessary to assign enthalpy values in a way that the common
datum cancels. This is achieved using the enthalpy of formation.
Like considerations apply when evaluating entropy values for substances in reacting
systems; for them absolute entropy values are required.
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
Control Volume at steady state
Methane, CH4 is burned with dry air. The molar analysis of the product on dry basis
is CO2, 9.7%; CO, 0.5%; O2, 2.95% ; and N2 86.85%. Methane gas at 400 K and 1
atm enter the combustion chamber and mixed with air entering at 500 K and 1atm.
The product combustion exit at 1800 K and 1 atm. For operation at steady sate,
determine the rate of heat transfer from combustion chamber in kJ per kmol of fuel.
Neglect kinetic and potential energy effect. The avarage value for the specific heat cp
of methane between 298 and 400 K is 38 kJ/kmol.K
CASE OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
Applying the conservation of mass principle to the carbon,
hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen
aCH 4 b 0 2 3.76 N 2 9.7CO2 0.5CO 2.95O2 86.85 N 2 cH 2O
hR 6844 kJ
kmol CH 4
CASE OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
hP 228079 kJ
kmol CH 4
.
Q CV
228079 kJ 6844 kJ
.
kmol CH 4 kmol CH 4
nF
.
Q CV
228079 kJ 6844 kJ
.
kmol CH 4 kmol CH 4
nF
.
Q CV
221235 kJ
. kmol CH 4
nF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
HEATING VALUE
The heating values of hydrocarbon fuels have important applications.
The heating value of a fuel is the difference between the enthalpy of the reactants
and the enthalpy of the products when the fuel burns completely with air, reactants
and products being at the same temperature T and pressure p.
That is, the heating value per mole of fuel
n h n h
R
i i
P
e e
R
n h
ni hfo h i
P
e f
o
h e
where
►R denotes the reactants and P denotes the products.
►The n’s correspond to the coefficients of the reaction equation, each per mole
of fuel.
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY REACTING SYSTEM
HEATING VALUE
►In the absence of work W cv and appreciable kinetic and potential energy effects, the
energy liberated on combustion is transferred from the reactor in two ways only
►Energy accompanying the exiting combustion products
►Heat transfer to the surroundings
►The smaller the heat transfer to the surroundings, the greater the energy carried out with
the combustion products and thus the greater the temperature TP of the combustion
products.
►The adiabatic flame temperature is the temperature that would be achieved by the
products in the limit of adiabatic operation.
►The maximum adiabatic flame temperature corresponds to complete combustion with
the theoretical amount of air.
DETERMINING THE ADIABATIC FLAME TEMPERATURE
The adiabatic flame temperature can be determined by use of the conservation of mass and
conservation of energy principles.
The equation to solve that problem using :
hP hR
ne .he ni .hi
P R
e f h
n . h o
n . h
e i f
o
h i
P R
n . h
P
e e ni . h i ni .h fio ne .h feo
R R P
REFERENCE
Moran, M.J., and Shaphiro, H.N., 2006, Fundamentals of Engineering
Thermodynamics 5th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, England
THANK
YOU