Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Profile
Impact Case
PT Waskita
Karya
Parties
Settlement
Involved
Analysis of
Legal
PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk was established on January 1, 1961. The company is
in charge of the Construction, Industrial, Realty and Trade Services business. Share
ownership by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia is 67.33% and the Community
is 32.77%.
The company's shares were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange on September
19, 2012 under the WSKT stock code. This company is also a BUMN company which has
the biggest Market Cap among other BUMN companies.
Back
Waskita Karya's financial report manipulation since mid-August 2009. Various terms are used
for this fraud, such as manipulation of financial statements, overstate, mark-ups, mark-ups, excess
profit recording, conducted by 3 Directors of PT Waskita Karya and 2 Public Accounting Firms (KAP).
The Ministry of State Owned Enterprises deactivated two directors of PT Waskita Karya related to
the case of excess recording in the 2004-2008 financial statements when they will conduct an IPO in
2008. (Infokorupsi.com: 2009). The case of asset abuses in PT Waskita Karya Persero was raised
when there was a change of directors.
The alternate President Director does not simply accept the old management's financial
statements and then asks another third party to conduct an in-depth audit of a particular account.
The contract was terminated by the Batang Hari Regional Government because it was deemed
signed by an unauthorized party, there was a case of replacement of the regent. As an illustration of
how much cash material the alleged value of asset bubbles in 2005. In 2005 the value of PT Waskita
Karya Persero's assets was Rp. 1.6 trillion, and the value allegedly inflated by management in 2005
was Rp. 5 billion or as much as 0. 3% of the value of the asset. In PT Waskita Karya's financial
statements, it was recorded that in 2008 it earned a profit of Rp 163.4 billion and in 2009 it earned a
profit of Rp 307.1 billion.
In the 2008 financial statements, it was disclosed that there were misstatements or asset
bubbles in 2005 amounting to Rp 5 billion. The value of Rp 5 billion consists of two ongoing projects,
the first project is the renovation project of the Riau Governor's Office. The project began in 2004 and
has been 100% complete, the contract value of Rp. 13.8 billion. But at the end of 2005 there were
additional work worth less than Rp 3 billion. As of the end of 2008, the balance still appeared in the
company's balance sheet as a gross bill to the employer. The second project is the Bulian Jambi
Sports Center development project. The contract value is Rp. 33,998,000,000 and PT Waskita Karya
Persero recognized contract revenue from the progress of Rp. 2 billion. The balance was outstanding
until the end of 2008. The contract was terminated by the Batang Hari Regional Government because
it was deemed signed by an unauthorized party, there was a case of replacement of the regent. As an
illustration of how much cash material the alleged value of asset swelling in 2005. In 2005 the value
of PT Waskita Karya Persero's assets was Rp1.6 trillion, and the value allegedly inflated by
management in 2005 was Rp5 billion or equal to 0.3% of the value of these assets. In PT Waskita
Karya's financial statements, it was recorded that in 2008 it earned an income of Rp 163.4 billion and
in 2009 obtained a profit of Rp 307.1 billion.
Based on these data the profit figures obtained by PT Waskita Karya are still relatively small
when compared to other similar companies. So PT Waskita Karya must continue to reform its
management so that it will produce better performance, one example is restructuring. This company
has good prospects in the future if the company improves the company's performance so that it can
optimize the company's resources.
Back
Back
The State Ministry of BUMN has deactivated two directors and one former Waskita director
related to the case of excess recording in the 2004-2007 financial statements. Two Waskita Directors
who have been deactivated include Bambang Marsono and Umar Triatman.
While one former Waskita director who was deactivated was Kiming Marsono who now serves
as President Director of PT Nindya Karya. Decree of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of
Indonesia in deactivated public accounting firms involved in the PT Waskita Karya fraud case.
Back
Manipulating financial statements is one of the criminal acts that can harm many people but
it will also tarnish the good name of the company. Manipulating a financial statement will certainly
involve a public accountant. Auditing conducted by the Public Accountant is expected to increase
the level of reliability of the company's financial statements rather than actually helping the
company to commit fraud or to help cover up fraud occurring within the company. In this case it
also involved internal and external auditors at PT Waskita Karya. The State Ministry of State Owned
Enterprises has deactivated two directors and one former Waskita director related to the case of
excess records in the 2004-2007 financial statements. This is a criminal case that must be resolved in
court in order to get legal sanctions. SOE Minister Sofyan Djalil has also sent a letter to the Minister
of Finance Sri Mulyani Indrawati regarding sanctions to public accountants suspected of being
involved in the evaluation of Waskita's financial statements. Based on a letter submitted by the
Minister of BUMN, the Minister of Finance finally decided to freeze several KAP involved in fraud at
PT Waskita Karya.
Back
Dropping the image of BUMN which so far we consider that BUMN has implemented quite good
management.
Reducing the confidence of investors who will buy shares of PT Waskita Karya, and make investors
rethink to maintain the shares planted in PT Waskita.
Increasing the length of a line of Indonesian companies that commit fraud, and this lowers
Indonesia's image in company management.
Negative views of people towards the collaboration between the auditor and the company being
audited. Though not all auditors do that and many auditors maintain integrity and other
provisions.
Apart from the five elements mentioned above, the principles of internal control are very
important in the company's efforts to overcome the risks faced, although each company will be
different and vary in its application.
Establishment of
Responsibility
Segregation of Duties
Documentation Procedures
Physical Controls
Independent Internal
Verification
Presented by :
Heru
Hermawan
Tasya
Kelompok 1 Siti Nuriah
Wahyuni
Tapa
Kurnia
Cahyani