Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 Backgound 02 Methods
A potential harmful 1. Observational database
effect of ACE 2. Between Desember
inhibitors and ARB 20,2021 and March 15,
on patient with 2021
cardiovascular 3. 169 hospital in Asia,
disease who are Europe, and North
suffering from Covid America
19
Abstract
03 Results 04 Conclusions
1. Underlying cardiovascular
- 8910 patients with Covid 19, disease is associated with an
515 died in hospital and 8395 increased risk of in-hospital
death among patients
patients survived hospitalized with Covid-19
2. No potential harmful effect of
ACE inhibitors and ARB on
- The are some factors patient with cardiovascular
associated with an increased disease who are suffering from
Covid 19
risk of in-hospital death
Covid 19 pandemic has spread around, several studies have
noted cardiac arrythmia, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac
arrest as terminal event in patient with Covid 19.
Higher risk of in-hospital death : The use of ACE-I and statin were associated
Age >65 yo, ACS, CHF, Cardiac with better chance of survival to hospital
arrhytmia, COPD, Current smoking discharge.
No association for the use of ARB
Infection with SARS-Cov-2 is mild to severe respiratory
illness characterized by a hyperinflammatory syndrome,
Discussion
5. all-cause mortality after the 5- day and longer courses did not differ
2. Randomization
Were the patients randomized to the intervention and control V
groups by a well-defined method of randomization?
Was the randomization list concealed from patients, clinicians and
researchers? V
Do the patients in each group have similar characteristics at the
beginning of the study? V
3. Blinding
Were the patients and clinicians kept blinded (masked) to which V
treatment was being given?
Were they kept blinded until the end of the study? V
Yes Can’t tell No
4. Follow Up V
Were all patients counted at the end of the
study?
If not, how many patients were lost to follow up
and for what reason?
Yes Can’t tell No
5. Intervention and co-intervention
Were the performed interventions described in sufficient detail to be V
followed by others?
Other than intervention, were the two groups cared for in similar way of
treatment? V
6. Selection of Outcomes
Does the article report all relevant outcomes including side effect? V
7. Effect Size
Was there a difference between the outcomes of the treatments? V
8. Using Result in Your own Setting
Are your patient so different from those studied that the results may not V
apply to them?
V
Is your environment so different from the one in the study that the
methods could not be use there?
THANK YOU