Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Implicit cost
1. Fred’s salary P125,000
Economic Profit vs. Accounting Profit
Accounting profit
= total revenue minus total explicit costs
Economic profit
= total revenue minus total costs (including
BOTH explicit and implicit costs)
Accounting profit ignores implicit costs,
so it will be greater than economic profit.
Economic Profit vs. Accounting Profit: Sample
L Q 3,000
(# of (bushels
workers) of wheat) 2,500
Quantity of output
0 0 2,000
1 1,000 1,500
2 1,800 1,000
3 2,400 500
4 2,800 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
5 3,000
# of workers
Marginal Product
L Q
(# of (bushels
MPL
workers) of wheat)
0 0
∆L = 1 ∆Q = 1,000
1 1,000
∆L = 1 ∆Q = 800
2 1,800
∆L = 1 ∆Q = 600
3 2,400
∆L = 1 ∆Q = 400
4 2,800
∆L = 1 ∆Q = 200
5 3,000
EXAMPLE 1: MPL = Slope of Prod. Function
L Q MPL
3,000 equals the
(# of (bushels MPL
slope of the
workers) of wheat) 2,500
Quantity of output
production function.
0 0 2,000
Notice that
1,000
1 1,000 MPL diminishes
1,500
800 as L increases.
2 1,800 1,000
600 This explains why
3 2,400 the
500 production
400 function gets flatter
4 2,800 0
200 as L0increases.
1 2 3 4 5
5 3,000
No. of workers
Why MPL Is Important
Resources:
• factory
• paper
• stapler
• staples
• labor
Why MPL Diminishes
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns:
the marginal product of a variable resource
eventually falls as the quantity of the resource
used increases (other things equal)
If we increases the # of workers but not the # of
staplers or the desk area, each add’l worker has
less to work with and will be less productive.
In general, MPL diminishes as L rises
whether the fixed resource is land (as would be
the case with Jack the wheat farmer) or capital
(our desk and stapler).
EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Costs
L Q
Cost of Cost of Total
(# of (bushels
land labor Cost
workers) of wheat)
0 0
1 1,000
2 1,800
3 2,400
4 2,800
5 3,000
EXAMPLE 1: Farmer Jack’s Total Cost Curve
Q $12,000
Total
(bushels
Cost $10,000
of wheat)
$8,000
Total cost
0 $1,000
$6,000
1,000 $3,000
$4,000
1,800 $5,000
$2,000
2,400 $7,000
$0
2,800 $9,000
0 1000 2000 3000
3,000 $11,000 Quantity of wheat
Marginal Cost
Marginal Cost (MC)
is the increase in Total Cost from producing one
more unit:
∆TC
MC =
∆Q
EXAMPLE 1: Total and Marginal Cost
Q
Total Marginal
(bushels
Cost Cost (MC)
of wheat)
0 $1,000
∆Q = 1000 ∆TC = $2000 $2.00
1,000 $3,000
∆Q = 800 ∆TC = $2000 $2.50
1,800 $5,000
∆Q = 600 ∆TC = $2000 $3.33
2,400 $7,000
∆Q = 400 ∆TC = $2000 $5.00
2,800 $9,000
∆Q = 200 ∆TC = $2000 $10.00
3,000 $11,000
EXAMPLE 1: The Marginal Cost Curve
$12
Q
(bushels TC MC $10 MC usually rises
of wheat) as Q rises,
Costs
2 100 120 $400
3 100 160
$300
4 100 210
$200
5 100 280
$100
6 100 380
$0
7 100 520 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
EXAMPLE 3: Marginal Cost
$200
Q TC MC Recall, Marginal Cost (MC)
is $175
the change in total cost from
0 $100
$70 producing
$150 one more unit:
1 170
50 $125 ∆TC
MC =
Costs
2 220 $100 ∆Q
40
3 260 Usually,
$75 MC rises as Q rises, due
50 to diminishing marginal product.
4 310 $50
70 Sometimes (as here), MC falls
5 380 $25
100 before rising.
6 480 $0
140 (In other0 examples,
1 2 3 MC 4 may
5 6be 7
7 620 constant.) Q
EXAMPLE 3: Average Fixed Cost
Q FC AFC $200
Average fixed cost (AFC)
0 $100 ---- is$175
fixed cost divided by the
quantity
$150 of output:
1 100
AFC
$125 = FC/Q
Costs
2 100
$100
3 100
Notice
$75 that AFC falls as Q rises:
4 100 The
$50firm is spreading its fixed
5 100 costs over a larger and larger
$25
number of units.
6 100 $0
7 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
EXAMPLE 3: Average Variable Cost
Q VC AVC $200
Average variable cost (AVC)
---- is$175
variable cost divided by the
0 $0
quantity
$150 of output:
1 70
AVC
$125 = VC/Q
Costs
2 120
$100
3 160 As$75
Q rises, AVC may fall initially.
4 210 In most cases, AVC will
$50
eventually rise as output rises.
5 280 $25
6 380 $0
7 520 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
EXAMPLE 3: Average Total Cost
Q TC ATC $200
Usually,
$175 as in this example,
0 $100 ----
the ATC curve is U-shaped.
$150
1 170 $170
$125
Costs
2 220 110
$100
3 260 86.67
$75
4 310 77.50 $50
5 380 76 $25
6 480 80 $0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 620 88.57
Q
EXAMPLE 3: The Cost Curves Together
$200
$175
$150
ATC
$125
Costs
AVC
$100
AFC
MC $75
$50
$25
$0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3:
Costs
Fill in the blank spaces of this table.
Q VC TC AFC AVC ATC MC
0 $50 ---- ---- ----
$10
1 10 $10 $60.00
2 30 80
30
3 16.67 20 36.67
4 100 150 12.50 37.50
5 150 30
60
6 210 260 8.33 35 43.33
34
EXAMPLE 3: Why ATC Is Usually U-shaped
As Q rises: $200
Initially, $175
falling AFC $150
pulls ATC down. $125
Costs
Eventually, $100
rising AVC $75
pulls ATC up.
$50
$25
$0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
EXAMPLE 3: ATC and MC
When MC < ATC, $200 ATC
ATC is falling. MC
$175
When MC > ATC, $150
ATC is rising. $125
Costs
The MC curve $100
crosses the $75
ATC curve at
$50
the ATC curve’s
$25
minimum.
$0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q
Lessons from Alternative Measures of Costs
Breaking down total costs into fixed cost, marginal cost,
average total cost, and average variable cost is useful because
each statistic offers its own insights for the firm.
Whatever the firm’s quantity of production, total revenue must
exceed total costs if it is to earn a profit. As explored in the
chapter Choice in a World of Scarcity, fixed costs are often
sunk costs that cannot be recouped. In thinking about what to
do next, sunk costs should typically be ignored, since this
spending has already been made and cannot be changed.
However, variable costs can be changed, so they convey
information about the firm’s ability to cut costs in the present
and the extent to which costs will increase if production rises.
Average cost tells a firm whether it can earn profits given the current price in the market. If we
divide profit by the quantity of output produced we get average profit, also known as the
firm’s profit margin. Expanding the equation for profit gives:
Thus:
This is the firm’s profit margin. This definition implies that if the market price is above
average cost, average profit, and thus total profit, will be positive; if price is below average
cost, then profits will be negative.
The marginal cost of producing an additional unit can be compared with the marginal revenue
gained by selling that additional unit to reveal whether the additional unit is adding to total
profit—or not. Thus, marginal cost helps producers understand how profits would be affected
by increasing or decreasing production.
Costs in the Long Run
Short run:
Some inputs are fixed
Long run:
All inputs are variable (firms can build new
factories, or remodel or sell existing ones)
In the long run, ATC at any Q is cost per unit
using the most efficient mix of inputs for that Q
(the factory size with the lowest ATC).
EXAMPLE 4: LRAC with 3 Factory Sizes
Firm can choose
from 3 factory Cost
sizes: S, M, L. ($)
ATCS ATCM
Each size has its ATCL
own SRATC curve.
Cost
($)
ATCS ATCM
ATCL
LRATC
Q
QA QB
A Typical LRAC Curve
In the real world,
factories come in Cost
many sizes,
each with its own LRAC
SRATC curve.
So a typical LRAC
curve
looks like this:
Q
How LRAC Changes as
the Scale of Production Changes
Economies of Cost
scale: LRAC falls
as Q increases.
LRAC
Constant returns
to scale: LRAC
stays the same
as Q increases.
Diseconomies of
Q
scale: LRAC rises
as Q increases.